ABSTRACT
NLRP3 (NOD-, LRR- and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome has recently become an intriguing target of several chronic and viral diseases. Here, we argue that targeting NLRP3 inflammasome could be a strategy to prevent cardiovascular outcomes [fulminant myocarditis, heart failure, venous thromboembolism (VTE)] and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We discuss the rationale for NLRP3 targeting in clinical trials as an effective therapeutic strategy aimed to improve prognosis of COVID-19, analyzing the potential of two therapeutic options (tranilast and OLT1177) currently available in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/metabolism , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cytokines/metabolism , Humans , Inflammasomes/metabolism , Myocarditis/prevention & control , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Prognosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , ortho-Aminobenzoates/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Gemcitabine and paclitaxel (PTX) are among the most active new drugs in advanced breast and ovarian cancer. In this Phase I study, we used fixed doses of gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8 and escalating doses of paclitaxel on day 1 of a 21-day cycle in patients with pretreated metastatic breast or ovarian cancer. The dose of gemcitabine was fixed at 1,000 mg/m2; PTX was commenced in the first small patient group at a dose of 90 mg/m2, which was then escalated in subsequent groups by 30 mg/m2 per step. From the third dose level onwards, all patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 300 microg by subcutaneous injection on days 5 and 6, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor on days 15-18. Cohorts of at least 3 patients were treated at each dose level. Dose escalation was stopped if at least a third of the patients in a given cohort had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, or grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the dose level immediately below that causing DLT in one-third of the patients or more. Evaluation of the tumour response was performed every three cycles. Forty-five patients (31 with breast cancer, 14 with ovarian cancer) were treated at seven different dose levels. Only at the seventh PTX dose level was DLT observed after the first course of therapy: three grade 4 neutropenia, one grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and one grade 4 anaemia. DLT occurred in 5/6 patients at at PTX dose of 270 mg/m2; therefore dose escalation was stopped at that level and the dose immediately before it (PTX 240 mg/m2) was considered as the MTD and recommended for further studies. No toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3-4 uncomplicated neutropenia was observed in four patients. Three had uncomplicated grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. One patient had grade 3 and one grade 4 anaemia. Nonhaematological side effects were generally mild. Among 30 evaluable patients with metastatic breast cancer, four complete responses (CR) (13%) and 12 partial responses (PR) (40%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 34-72). The median duration of response was 31 weeks. Among 13 evaluable patients with advanced ovarian cancer, one CR (8%) and five PRs (38%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 46% (95% CI 19-78). The median duration of response was 32 weeks. Our study shows that gemcitabine and PTX can be administered in combination in patients with breast and ovarian cancer without unexpected toxicities and with encouraging therapeutic results.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Disease Progression , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Humans , Middle Aged , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , GemcitabineABSTRACT
Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are among the most active new agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are worth considering for second-line chemotherapy. In this phase I-II study, we combined gemcitabine and paclitaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine doses were kept fixed at 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, and paclitaxel doses were escalated from 90 mg/m2 on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Thirty-seven patients were treated at six different dose levels. Grade 4 neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), since it occurred in two out of six patients treated at paclitaxel 240 mg/m2; the paclitaxel dose level just below (210 mg/m2) was selected for phase Il evaluation. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. One complete response (CR) (3%) and 13 partial responses (PR) (36%) were observed in 36 evaluable patients for an overall response rate of 39% (95% C.I., 23-57%). Median duration of response was 35 weeks (range, 8-102). All of the observed objective responses occurred in the 19 patients who had previously responded to the first-line therapy. Median survival was 40 weeks (range, 8-108 weeks). The combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active scheme for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC; further evaluation, at least in selected patients, such as those previously responding to first-line chemotherapy, is definitely warranted.
