The impact of key secular trends during the first three waves the COVID-19 pandemic.

IMPORTANCE: Patient age, comorbidity burden, and disease severity at presentation are the major factors associated with surviving COVID-19. Hospital-level factors including ICU occupancy may confer additional risk to individual patients, particularly at times of maximal stress on healthcare systems. The interaction of patient- and hospital-level factors over time during pandemic disease remains an area of active exploration. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of patient and hospital risk factors during episodic surges, characterize severity distribution between waves, and evaluate patient-level impact of ICU capacity on COVID-19 survivorship. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Four acute care hospitals within an integrated healthcare network in San Diego, California. PARTICIPANTS: All patients (18+ y.o.) admitted with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 or ICD-10 code for COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Patient survivorship and length of stay. RESULTS: Six thousand eight hundred fifty-one patients were evaluated in this large cohort series. Patient level factors associated with mortality included: severity at admission (WHO Clinical Progression Score [WCPS]), age, gender, BMI, marital status, language preference, Elixhauser score, elevated laboratory (d-dimer, ferritin, LDH) or lower absolute lymphocyte count. When adjusting for patient age alone, survivorship during surges was also inversely associated with ICU occupancy, though this correlation was not present when adjusted for patient-level factors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient age, comorbidity burden, and severity at the time of presentation are the major factors associated with surviving COVID-19. Hospital-level factors including ICU occupancy may confer additional risk to individual patients, particularly at times of maximal stress on healthcare systems.

Effect of Physician Delegation to Other Healthcare Providers on the Quality of Care for Geriatric Conditions.

The quality of care of older adults in the United States has been consistently shown to be inadequate. This gap between recommended and actual care provides an opportunity to improve the value of health care for older adults. Prior work from the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) investigators first defined, and then sought to improve, clinical practice for common geriatric conditions. A critical component of the ACOVE intervention for practice improvement was an emphasis on the delegation of specific care processes, but the independent effect of delegation on the quality of care has not been evaluated. This study analyzed the pooled results of prior ACOVE projects from 1998 to 2010. Totaled, these studies included 4,776 individuals aged 65 and older of mixed demographic backgrounds and 16,204 ACOVE quality indicators (QIs) for three geriatric conditions: falls, urinary incontinence, and dementia. In unadjusted analyses, QI pass probabilities were 0.36 for physician-performed tasks, 0.55 for nurse practitioner (NP)-, physician assistant (PA)-, and registered nurse (RN)-performed tasks; and 0.61 for medical assistant- and licensed vocational nurse-performed tasks. In multiply adjusted models, the independent pass-probability effect of delegation to NPs, PAs, and RNs was 1.37 (P = .05). These findings suggest that delegation of selected tasks to nonphysician healthcare providers is associated with higher quality of care for these geriatric conditions in community practices and supports the value of interdisciplinary team management for common outpatient conditions in older adults.

Surgical approaches to epicardial pacemaker placement: does pocket location affect lead survival?

Permanent cardiac pacing in pediatric patients presents challenges related to small patient size, complex anatomy, electrophysiologic abnormalities, and limited access to cardiac chambers. Epicardial pacing currently remains the conventional technique for infants and patients with complex congenital heart disease. Pacemaker lead failure is the major source of failure for such epicardial systems. The authors hypothesized that a retrocostal surgical approach would reduce the rate of lead failure due to fracture compared with the more traditional subrectus and subxiphoid approaches. To evaluate this hypothesis, a retrospective chart review analyzed patients with epicardial pacemaker systems implanted or followed at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego between January 1980 and May 2007. The study cohort consisted of 219 patients and a total of 620 leads with epicardial pacemakers. Among these patients, 84% had structural congenital heart disease, and 45% were younger than 3 years at time of the first implantation. The estimated lead survival was 93% at 2 years and 83% at 5 years. The majority of leads failed due to pacing problems (54%), followed by lead fracture (31%) and sensing problems (14%). When lead failure was adjusted for length of follow-up period, no significant differences in the rates of failure by pocket location were found.