The role of arthroscopy in patients with persistent hip pain after total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a safe and successful procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis. One of the most common postoperative problems remains persistent hip pain. The arthroscopic evaluation of persistent hip pain following THA can be a valuable diagnostic tool in a select number of patients when carried out by experts in this technique. OBJECTIVE: Indication for arthroscopy was persistent pain after THA. Inclusion criteria were an absence of radiological loosening and a sterile aspiration 6 weeks before arthroscopy. Hip joint function and pain were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), which scored the activities of daily living (ADL), and a sports subscale. METHODS: 5 patients (3 female, 2 male) with an average age of 60.2 ± 4.27 years (range 51-72 years) were included in the study. Arthroscopy with biopsy, adhesiolysis and psoas tendon release was performed 21.0 ± 21.97 months (range 6-57 months) after primary hip replacement. RESULTS: Pathological findings were prosthetic joint infection (two cases), impingement between acetabular component and psoas tendon (two cases), adhesions of the periprosthetic tissue (one case). The patients achieved a significant improvement of the Hip Outcome Score (HOS), from an average of 45.6 ± 22.5 (range 14.0-63.1) to 76.5 ± 3.8 (range 41.0-89.4, P=0.016). Evaluation of the VAS showed a significant improvement from a preoperative value of 8.8 ± 0.5 to a postoperative value of 3.4 ± 1.0 (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Hip arthroscopy provides a minimal-invasive tool for diagnosis and therapy. In cases of persistent pain after THA, standard diagnostic procedures should be utilised. Arthroscopy of a hip post-THA would be highly specialised. As a next step, arthroscopy helps the diagnosis and therapy of persistent pain after THA.

How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations?

BACKGROUND: Lateral dislocation of the patella (LPD) leads to cartilaginous injuries, which have been reported to be associated with retropatellar complaints and the development of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of MRI for cartilage diagnostics after a first and recurrent LPD. METHODS: After an average of 4.7 days following an acute LPD, 40 patients (21 with first LPDs and 19 with recurrent LPDs) underwent standardized 1.5 Tesla MRI (sagittal T1-TSE, coronal STIR-TSE, transversal fat-suppressed PD-TSE, sagittal fat-suppressed PD-TSE). MRI grading was compared to arthroscopic assessment of the cartilage. RESULTS: Sensitivities and positive predictive values for grade 3 and 4 lesions were markedly higher in the patient group with first LPDs compared to the group with recurrent LPDs. Similarly, intra- and inter-observer agreement yielded higher kappa values in patients with first LPDs compared to those with recurrent LPDs. All grade 4 lesions affecting the subchondral bone (osteochondral defects), such as a fissuring or erosion, were correctly assessed on MRI. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a comparatively good diagnostic performance for MRI in the evaluation of first and recurrent LPDs, and we therefore recommend MRI for the cartilage assessment after a LPD.

Arthroscopy vs. MRI for a detailed assessment of cartilage disease in osteoarthritis: diagnostic value of MRI in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In patients with osteoarthritis, a detailed assessment of degenerative cartilage disease is important to recommend adequate treatment. Using a representative sample of patients, this study investigated whether MRI is reliable for a detailed cartilage assessment in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. METHODS: In a cross sectional-study as a part of a retrospective case-control study, 36 patients (mean age 53.1 years) with clinically relevant osteoarthritis received standardized MRI (sag. T1-TSE, cor. STIR-TSE, trans. fat-suppressed PD-TSE, sag. fat-suppressed PD-TSE, Siemens Magnetom Avanto syngo MR B 15) on a 1.5 Tesla unit. Within a maximum of three months later, arthroscopic grading of the articular surfaces was performed. MRI grading by two blinded observers was compared to arthroscopic findings. Diagnostic values as well as intra- and inter-observer values were assessed. RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement between readers 1 and 2 was good (kappa = 0.65) within all compartments. Intra-observer agreement comparing MRI grading to arthroscopic grading showed moderate to good values for readers 1 and 2 (kappa = 0.50 and 0.62, respectively), the poorest being within the patellofemoral joint (kappa = 0.32 and 0.52). Sensitivities were relatively low at all grades, particularly for grade 3 cartilage lesions. A tendency to underestimate cartilage disorders on MR images was not noticed. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the use of MRI for precise grading of the cartilage in osteoarthritis is limited. Even if the practical benefit of MRI in pretreatment diagnostics is unequivocal, a diagnostic arthroscopy is of outstanding value when a grading of the cartilage is crucial for a definitive decision regarding therapeutic options in patients with osteoarthritis.

Early patellofemoral osteoarthritis caused by an osteochondral defect after retrograde solid nailing of the femur in sheep.

BACKGROUND: Retrograde femoral nailing (RFN) is an increasingly used technique for internal fixation of femoral fractures. Geometrically and empirically, the nail entry zone is close to the center of the femoral groove, causing concern about the development of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. METHODS: We studied the effect of opening the distal femur through the femoral groove on the development of osteoarthritis in sheep after retrograde reamed insertion of a solid titanium nail into the femoral canal. Knees were radiographically and macroscopically studied for the presence of osteophytes and signs of cartilage degeneration. Controls underwent the same procedure without opening the femoral groove. RESULTS: The study group showed time-dependent macroscopic and radiographic signs of osteoarthritis with predominant involvement of the patellofemoral joint. CONCLUSION: RFN can cause patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Care should be exercised to use RFN in isolated supracondylar or shaft fractures of the femur in healthy young adults.

Reconstruction of the greater trochanter with an allograft after resection of a giant cell tumor.

Our report involves the rare case of a giant cell tumor which filled out the greater trochanter. After complete resection of the greater trochanter, reconstructive surgery using a bone allograft was performed. Although the allograft healed without any complications, it was resorbed within 28 months, and there were no signs of infection or tumor recurrence during this period. Even though the greater trochanter was missing, the 32-year-old patient did not have any complaints and showed no weakness of the abductor muscles. This shows that compensation for the missing greater trochanter is possible in adulthood. If the vasto-gluteal muscle sling is maintained, the greater trochanter, which would only function as a hypomochlion, may not be necessary. This is why we do not recommend reconstruction of the greater trochanter with an allograft when it is possible to maintain the tendineous junction between the vastus lateralis muscle and the gluteal muscles.