Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 61(1): 113-21, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252914

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of an intervention on drug-related problem (DRP; adverse drug reactions, adherence problems, underuse)-related readmission rates in older adults. DESIGN: Ancillary study from a 6-month, prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial. SETTING: Six acute geriatric units in Paris and suburbs. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred sixty-five consecutively admitted individuals were included: 317 in the intervention group (IG) and 348 in the control group (CG) (aged 86.1 ± 6.2, 66% female). INTERVENTION: Discharge-planning intervention combining chronic drug review, education, and enhanced transition-of-care communication. MEASUREMENTS: Chronic drugs at discharge of the two groups were compared. An expert committee blinded to group assignment adjudicated whether 6-month readmission to the study hospitals was related to drugs. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine individuals were discharged and followed up (300 IG, 339 CG). The intervention had no significant effect on drug regimen at discharge, characterized by prescriptions that are mostly appropriate but increase iatrogenic risk. Three hundred eleven readmissions occurred during follow-up (180 CG, 131 IG), of which 185 (59.5%) were adjudicated (102 CG, 83 IG). For 16, DRP imputability was doubtful. Of the remaining 169, DRPs were the most frequent cause for readmission, with 38 (40.4%) readmissions in the CG and 26 (34.7%) in the IG (relative risk reduction = 14.3%, 95% confidence interval = 14.0-14.5%, P = .54). The intervention was associated with 39.7% fewer readmissions related to adverse drug reactions (P = .12) despite the study's lack of power. CONCLUSION: Drug-related problem prevention in older people discharged from the hospital should be a priority, with a focus on improving the monitoring of drugs with high iatrogenic risk.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Health Services for the Aged/statistics & numerical data , Medication Errors/prevention & control , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Interactions , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Paris , Prospective Studies
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 59(11): 2017-28, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22091692

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a new multimodal comprehensive discharge-planning intervention would reduce emergency rehospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits for very old inpatients. DESIGN: Six-month prospective, randomized (Zelen design), parallel-group, open-label trial. SETTING: Six acute geriatric units (AGUs) in Paris and its surroundings. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred sixty-five consecutive inpatients aged 70 and older (intervention group (IG) n = 317; control group (CG) n = 348). INTERVENTION: Intervention-dedicated geriatricians different from those in the study centers implemented the intervention, which targeted three risk factors for preventable readmissions and consisted of three components: comprehensive chronic medication review, education on self-management of disease, and detailed transition-of-care communication with outpatient health professionals. MEASUREMENTS: Emergency hospitalization or ED visit 3 and 6 months after discharge, as assessed by telephone calls to the participant, the caregiver, and the general practitioner and confirmed with the hospital administrative database. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of IG participants were readmitted to hospital or had an ED visit 3 months after discharge, compared with 30.5% of CG participants (P = .03); at 6 months, the proportions were 35.3% and 40.8%, respectively (P = .15). Event-free survival was significantly higher in the IG at 3 months (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.53-0.97, P = .03) but not at 6 months (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.04, P = .10). CONCLUSION: This intervention was effective in reducing rehospitalizations and ED visits for very elderly participants 3 but not 6 months after their discharge from the AGU. Future research should investigate the effect of this intervention of transitional care in a larger population and in usual acute and subacute geriatric care.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Acute Disease/therapy , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Paris , Prognosis , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...