[The marginal vein-Still a rare entity: case series of 16 patients]. / Die Marginalvene ­ nach wie vor eine seltene Entität: Fallserie von 16 Patienten.

BACKGROUND: The marginal vein (MV) is a congenital, predominantly venous vascular malformation, which is based on a lack of regression of the embryonic venous system in the lower extremities and is associated with a variety of complications. So far, no uniform treatment regimens have been described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: What are the treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with a MV? MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2020, all patients treated at the University Hospital Augsburg with MV were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The median age at the time of diagnosis was 14.8 years (3-42 years). Out of 16 patients 12 had a leg length difference, 75% of patients (12/16) already had chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) at the time of diagnosis of MV. Open surgical removal of MV was performed as first-line treatment in 31.3% (5/16) patients. The MV was primarily closed by endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) in 1/16 patients, 15/16 patients were treated with redo procedures and 2.6 ± 2.4 (mean±SD) redo procedures were performed per patient in follow-up. The mean follow-up was 8.1 years. DISCUSSION: In order to prevent/avoid progression of CVI and thrombosis prophylaxis, the MV should be closed/removed promptly after diagnosis. The use of conventional surgical techniques for the removal of MV seems to have an advantage over treatment with minimally invasive procedures in terms of the number of secondary interventions required.

[Resource requirements in the surgical treatment of COVID­19 patients at a university clinic of maximum care]. / Ressourcenbedarf bei der chirurgischen Behandlung von COVID­19-Patienten in der universitären Maximalversorgung.

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID­19) are possible under strict hygiene and protective measures and are currently carried out regularly. This study examined how much additional work this involves. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured evaluation of 71 surgical procedures performed at the Augsburg University Hospital between 1 November 2020 until 31 December 2020 was carried out. The operations on COVID­19 patients were compared to procedures on non-COVID­19 patients with respect to temporal, structural and staff resources, exemplified by four interventions: transbrachial embolectomy, total hip arthroplasty (H-TEP), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) and new implantations of cardiac pacemakers. RESULTS: The incision to suture times between the interventions in patients with COVID­19 and non-COVID­19 patients did not show any significant differences in any of the four interventions evaluated. The postoperative monitoring in the operating room, which is identified as time-consuming in many interventions, was often circumvented by postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit or by the use of local anesthetic procedures. For major operations, such as H­TEP, the preparation time was shown to be significantly longer (p = 0.037). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher requirement for anesthesia nursing personnel of 1.5 vs. 1.0 (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: A quantification of the additional effort of operative treatment is difficult due to the already complex care of COVID­19 patients; however, it can be assumed that there is an increased need for additional human and structural resources due to the supply of material from outside the operating room, which is not documented in the standard recording.

[Treatment strategies and outcomes for injection-associated inguinal perivascular abscesses in intravenous drug addicts]. / Behandlungsstrategien und Ergebnisse bei injektionsassoziierten inguinalen perivaskulären Abszessen bei intravenös Drogenabhängigen.

BACKGROUND: Long-term drug users regularly present with deep inguinal vascular-associated abscesses due to continued drug injections utilizing superficial veins. The treatment of these complications continues to be a major medical challenge. So far no uniform treatment regimens have been described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: What are the treatment strategies and outcomes of injection-associated inguinal perivascular abscesses in drug addicts? MATERIAL AND METHODS: All drug users treated at the Augsburg University Hospital in the period between 1 January 2004 and 31 May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with the currently available literature. RESULTS: In this study 37 cases (male = 25, female = 12) could be included in the data collection after implementation of the inclusion criteria. The median age in the investigated patient population was 34.3 years. The 30-day mortality was 2.7% (1/37). The amputation rate was 2.8%. In the investigated collective 13 patients had arterial involvement, in 5 cases a ligature of arteries was primarily used and in another 5 cases a reconstruction using an autologous conduit graft was primarily performed. In another 3 cases an obturator bypass (1/3) was placed and a patch plasty (2/3). The patency rate after arterial reconstruction was 87.5% with a mean follow-up of 421 days. The overall complication rate was 51.4%. CONCLUSION: For vascular involvement an approach appropriate for the situation is meaningful. In addition to the elimination of complicated septic venous thromboses, the correction of arterial hemorrhages using autologous reconstruction measures seems promising.

[Increased risk of deep vein thrombosis in intensive care unit patients with CoViD-19 infections?-Preliminary data]. / Erhöhtes Risiko für tiefe Beinvenenthrombosen bei Intensivpatienten mit CoViD-19-Infektion? ­ Erste Daten.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in CoViD-19 patients in intensive care units (ICU) has so far been investigated in only a few studies. Prospective comparative studies with non-CoViD-19 ICU patients are completely lacking. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the incidence of DVT in ICU patients with CoViD-19 compared to non-CoViD-19 ICU patients who were treated in the University Hospital Augsburg during the same period. In addition, the aim was to investigate what type of anticoagulation was present in CoViD-19 patients at the time the DVT occurred and to what extent DVT is associated with increased mortality in this patient population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective single center study, which was conducted between 18 April 2020 and 30 April 2020, 20 SARS-CoV2 positive patients were compared with 20 non-CoVid-19 patients in the ICU with respect to the occurrence of DVT. For this purpose, demographic data, laboratory parameters, and clinical outcomes were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: The rate of DVT in the investigated patient collective was markedly higher in patients with SARS-CoV2 (CoViD-19 patients 20% vs. non-CoViD-19 patients 5%). Both DVT and elevated D­dimer levels were associated with increased mortality in the present study. CONCLUSION: We recommend the determination of D­dimer levels and, in the case of elevated levels, the broad indication for compression sonography of the deep leg veins on admission of patients with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV2. In this way DVT in the setting of CoViD-19 can be recognized early and therapeutic anticoagulation can be started. All inpatient CoViD-19 patients should receive thrombosis prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. Further studies on point of care methods (TEG®, ROTEM®) for the detection of hypercoagulability in SARS-CoV2 are necessary.

The incidence of incisional hernia after aortic aneurysm is not higher than after benign colorectal interventions: A retrospective control-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) have most probably an inflammatory origin, whereby the elastica is the layer actually involved. In the past, collagen weackness was supposed to be the shared cause of both, AAA and incisional hernias. Since the development of new techniques of closure of the abdominal wall over the last decade, collagen deficency seems to play only a secondary etiologic role. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether the incidence of incisional hernia following laparotomy due to AAA differs from that of colorectal interventions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective control matched cohort study. After screening of 403 patients with colorectal interventions and 96 patients with AAA, 27 and 72 patients, respectively were included. The match criteria for inclusion of patients with colorectal interventions were: age, benign underlying disease and median xiphopubic laparotomy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of an incisional hernia. The secondary endpoints were the risk profile, length of stay in the intensive care unit and postoperative complications. Data analysis was carried in the consecutive collective from 2006 to 2008. RESULTS: In the group with AAA the mean follow-up was 34.5±18.1 months and in the group with colorectal interventions 35.7±21.4 months. The incidence of incisional hernias showed no significant differences between the two groups. In the AAA group 10 patients (13.8%) developed an incisional hernia in contrast to 7 patients in the colorectal intervention group (25.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In our collective patients with AAA did not show an increased incidence of incisional hernia in comparison to patients with colorectal interventions with comparable size of the laparotomy access and age. The quality of closure of the abdominal wall seems to be an important factor for the prevention of incisional hernia.