Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 19(4): 222-8, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25393811

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Studies have shown that inappropriate therapeutic strategies may be adopted if crown and root changes are misdiagnosed, potentially leading to undesirable consequences. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate a digital learning object, developed to improve skills in diagnosing radiographic dental changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The object was developed using the Visual Basic Application (VBA) software and evaluated by 62 undergraduate students (male: 24 and female: 38) taking an imaging diagnosis course. Participants were divided in two groups: test group, which used the object and control group, which attended conventional classes. After 3 weeks, students answered a 10-question test and took a practice test to diagnose 20 changes in periapical radiographs. RESULTS: The results show that test group performed better that control group in both tests, with statistically significant difference (P = 0.004 and 0.003, respectively). In overall, female students were better than male students. Specific aspects of object usability were assessed using a structured questionnaire based on the System Usability Scale (SUS), with a score of 90.5 and 81.6 by male and female students, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained in this study suggest that students who used the DLO performed better than those who used conventional methods. This suggests that the DLO may be a useful teaching tool for dentistry undergraduates, on distance learning courses and as a complementary tool in face-to-face teaching.


Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Education, Dental/methods , Radiography, Dental , Educational Measurement , Female , Humans , Male , Radiology/education , Software
2.
J Oral Rehabil ; 41(12): 957-67, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25142004

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review on the use of radiographic methods for the diagnosis of misfit in dental prostheses and restorations. The MEDLINE bibliographic database was searched from 1950 to February 2014 for reports on the radiographic diagnosis of misfits. The search strategy was limited to English-language publications using the following combined MeSH terms in the search strategy: (Dental Restoration OR Dental Prosthesis OR Crown OR Inlays OR Dental Abutments) and (Dental Leakage OR Prosthesis Fitting OR Dental Marginal Adaptation OR Surface Properties) and (Radiography, Dental OR Radiography, Dental, Digital OR Cone-Beam Computed Tomography). Twenty-eight publications were identified and read in full text, and 14 studies fulfilled criteria for inclusion. Information regarding the use of radiographic methods for the diagnosis of misfits in dental prosthesis and restorations, and in which the methodology/results comprised information regarding how the sample was collected/prepared, the method, imaging protocol, presence of a reference test and the outcomes were evaluated. QUADAS criteria was used to rate the studies in high, moderate or low quality. The evidence supporting the use of radiographic methods for the diagnosis of misfits in dental prosthesis and restorations is limited to low-/moderate-quality studies. The well-established intra-oral orthogonal projection is still under investigation and considered the most appropriate method, both when evaluating the relation between dental restoration to tooth and abutment to implant. Studies using digital radiographs have not evaluated the effect of image post-processing, and tomography has not been evaluated.


Subject(s)
Dental Prosthesis , Radiography, Dental , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Marginal Adaptation , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Prosthesis Retention , Humans , Prosthesis Fitting , Surface Properties
3.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 43(4): 20130449, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24660954

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess radiographic observers' ability to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT and to decide early termination of the examination. METHODS: 100 patients were video-recorded during cone beam CT examination. Patients' videos were cropped twice: fitting the active 20-s examination time or the initial non-radiation 3 s of the examination. x- and y-coordinates of pre-defined points marked on the patient's face were used to define the reference standard for movement in the 20-s videos. A sample of 40 non-moving and 20 moving patients was selected. Eight observers scored the videos. The 3-s videos were scored: 0, the patient did not move; 1, the patient moved and the examination should be terminated. The 20-s videos were scored: 0, the patient did not move; 1, the patient moved. Re-assessment of 15% of the videos provided intra-observer reproducibility. The 20-s videos were compared with the reference standard providing sensitivity and specificity values (movement/non-movement recognition). The scores of the 3-s videos were compared with the scores of the 20-s videos. RESULTS: Intra- and interobserver reproducibility ranged from substantial to almost perfect for both videos. The 20-s videos allowed patient movement recognition with a high specificity and a medium to high sensitivity. The 3-s videos allowed early termination of the examination with a small number of incorrect positive scores. The majority of the patients scored as moving in the 20-s videos were detected in the 3-s videos. CONCLUSIONS: By observing video recordings, trained observers are able to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT examination with high specificity and to decide an early termination of the examination.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/standards , Head Movements , Head/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Dental, Digital/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Patient Compliance , Patient Positioning , Pattern Recognition, Visual , Reference Standards , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Video Recording , Young Adult
4.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 41(2): 136-42, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22301638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional cephalograms with total and half-skull synthesized cone beam CT (CBCT) cephalograms. METHODS: Cephalometric analyses of 30 clinically symmetric patients were conducted by a calibrated examiner on conventional and CBCT-synthesized cephalograms (total, right and left). Reproducibility was investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of the measurements from each factor obtained by conventional, total, right and left CBCT-synthesized cephalograms. RESULTS: The ICC was above 0.9 for most of the 40 cephalometric factors analysed, revealing similar levels of reproducibility. When the measurements obtained from conventional and CBCT-synthesized cephalograms were compared, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a strong agreement between them. CONCLUSIONS: Half-skull CBCT-synthesized cephalograms offer the same diagnostic performance and equivalent reproducibility in terms of cephalometric analysis as observed in conventional and total CBCT-synthesized cephalograms.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 39(7): 414-23, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20841459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The validity of any measurement obtained through a cephalogram largely depends on the reproducibility of the cephalometric landmarks. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of a programme of professional calibration (PPC) on the variability of landmark identification comparing conventional radiographs and cone beam CT (CBCT)-synthesized cephalograms. METHODS: 5 graduate students in oral radiology identified 20 cephalometric landmarks from cephalograms generated from conventional radiographs (RADs), Ray-Sum CBCT-synthesized cephalograms (CBTs) and half-skull CBT (HSTs) from 10 patients. After a period of reinforcement on instruction and calibration with inter- and intraexaminer assessment of reproducibility (intraclass coefficient correlation scores > 0.75) for RADs, CBTs and HSTs obtained from 5 different patients, observers were asked to repeat the analysis of the first 10 patients under the same circumstances. Values in millimetres represented each landmark in a table of Cartesian co-ordinates (x- and y-axes). RESULTS: ANOVA showed significant reduction in variability levels after the PPC, and there were no differences among the methods of image acquisition. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the PPC accounted for reduction in variability levels in 14 of 20 landmarks. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a PPC has more influence than the type of image acquisition on variability of landmark identification based on two-dimensional cephalometric analysis. Cephalograms obtained from RAD or CBCT can be considered equivalent for clinical and experimental applications.


Subject(s)
Cephalometry/methods , Cephalometry/standards , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Radiology/education , Analysis of Variance , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results
6.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 36(7): 393-6, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17881597

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of CT to detect simulated external root resorption defects. METHODS: External root resorption defects of different sizes and in different locations were simulated in 59 human mandibular incisors. Cavities simulating root resorption defects of 0.6 mm, 1.2 mm, or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3 mm, 0.6 mm, or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large defects) were drilled in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of buccal surfaces. Axial CT was used to obtain cross-sectional images of the teeth, and 177 root thirds were assessed by a blinded observer. RESULTS: Of the 131 cavities, 117 were detected (89%). 32 of the 44 (72.72%) cavities located in the apical third were identified. A statistically significant difference (P<0.01) was found between the sizes of defects examined in the apical third. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of CT diagnostic ability revealed high sensitivity and excellent specificity. However, small cavities located in the apical third were more difficult to detect than all other cavities.


Subject(s)
Root Resorption/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Anatomy, Cross-Sectional , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Incisor/diagnostic imaging , Mandible , Observer Variation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Tooth Apex/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Cervix/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...