ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: The determination of thyroglobulin (Tg) in the follow-up of differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTC), is routinely used in nuclear medicine, although some problems, like a disturbed recovery-test (RT) or autoantibodies to thyroglobulin (TgAb), are well known. But it is a controversial issue in literature, whether the determination of TgAb should be performed beside or instead of the RT. OBJECTIVE: The study compares the clinical value of the determination of both TgAb and RT with sensitive assays. METHODS: 356 patients (pts) were investigated. The results were compared to the concentration of Tg in the sera of the pts. 288 pts stayed tumor-free, the remaining 68 pts showed a recurrence (local and/or metastatic) of their DTC. We measured Tg (with RT) using an immunoradiometric assay (Tg-IRMA; SELco Tg; Fa. Medipan Diagnostica GmbH) and TgAb using a direct assay (CentAK anti-Tg; also from Fa. Medipan). RESULTS: The prevalence of TgAb, and of disturbed RT respectively, in the whole population of DTC-pts was 7.6%, in the subgroup of tumor-free pts 6.6%, and in the remaining pts with tumor-recurrence 11.8%, respectively 2.0%, 1.7% and 2.9%. In a significantly higher percentage of pts with local/metastatic recurrence, both a positive TgAb (p < 0.001) and a disturbed RT (p < 0.05) were found. 7/68 pts with tumor-recurrence but Tg < 1 ng/ml showed positive TgAb, only 2/7 had a disturbed RT. In this group, no patient with Tg > 1 ng/ml demonstrated either positive TgAb or disturbed RT (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The determination of TgAb in the follow-up of DTC is necessary, because it supports a suspicion to tumor-recurrence in pts with negative Tg. Also the RT is of great value because of a possibly High dose hook-effect.
