Using the Oxford Foot Model to determine the association between objective measures of foot function and results of the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale and the Foot Function Index: a prospective gait analysis study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: After cross-cultural adaption for the German translation of the Ankle-Hindfoot Scale of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS-AHS) and agreement analysis with the Foot Function Index (FFI-D), the following gait analysis study using the Oxford Foot Model (OFM) was carried out to show which of the two scores better correlates with objective gait dysfunction. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Results of the AOFAS-AHS and FFI-D, as well as data from three-dimensional gait analysis were collected from 20 patients with mild to severe ankle and hindfoot pathologies.Kinematic and kinetic gait data were correlated with the results of the total AOFAS scale and FFI-D as well as the results of those items representing hindfoot function in the AOFAS-AHS assessment. With respect to the foot disorders in our patients (osteoarthritis and prearthritic conditions), we correlated the total range of motion (ROM) in the ankle and subtalar joints as identified by the OFM with values identified during clinical examination 'translated' into score values. Furthermore, reduced walking speed, reduced step length and reduced maximum ankle power generation during push-off were taken into account and correlated to gait abnormalities described in the scores. An analysis of correlations with CIs between the FFI-D and the AOFAS-AHS items and the gait parameters was performed by means of the Jonckheere-Terpstra test; furthermore, exploratory factor analysis was applied to identify common information structures and thereby redundancy in the FFI-D and the AOFAS-AHS items. RESULTS: Objective findings for hindfoot disorders, namely a reduced ROM, in the ankle and subtalar joints, respectively, as well as reduced ankle power generation during push-off, showed a better correlation with the AOFAS-AHS total score-as well as AOFAS-AHS items representing ROM in the ankle, subtalar joints and gait function-compared with the FFI-D score.Factor analysis, however, could not identify FFI-D items consistently related to these three indicator parameters (pain, disability and function) found in the AOFAS-AHS. Furthermore, factor analysis did not support stratification of the FFI-D into two subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The AOFAS-AHS showed a good agreement with objective gait parameters and is therefore better suited to evaluate disability and functional limitations of patients suffering from foot and ankle pathologies compared with the FFI-D.

Analysis of agreement between the German translation of the American Foot and Ankle Society's Ankle and Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS) and the Foot Function Index in its validated German translation by Naal et al. (FFI-D).

BACKGROUND: Despite its wide use in clinical outcome measurement, there is yet no validated German language version of the AOFAS-AHS available. After finishing cross-cultural adaption of the AOFAS-AHS according to the AAOS guidelines, an analysis of agreement was carried out. METHODS: This was done by means of the 18-item Foot Function Index in its validated German translation by Naal et al. (FFI-D). The results of 91 orthopedic patients as well as healthy persons in both scores were then compared intraindividually. The cohort consisted of 46 individuals with hindfoot disorders and 45 persons without any hindfoot complaints. The FFI-D-Score was linearly transformed in the range 0-100 points of the AOFAS. RESULTS: Encouraging correlation was then found for the patients with hindfoot disorders (Spearman's correlation 0.73 (95% CI 0.52-0.85); a median deviation of -2 points (interquartile range -13 points; +13 points) in patients with hindfoot disorders implied good median intraindividual score concordance. However, with 30 of these 46 patients showing score deviations beyond or below a pre-specified ±10 points range of clinically tolerable deviations, the scores cannot be considered exchangeable. CONCLUSION: Although the agreement analysis was performed for the German translation of the two questionnaires, analogous results can be expected also for other languages. It should be noted that the results do not allow for judging which of the scores is better suited to give a valid statement on patient outcome in treatment of hindfoot disorders. To verify which of these two scores is better suited to represent hindfoot-dysfunction a subsequent study using instrumental gait analysis and surface EMG is being carried out.

Prospective study of a cementless, mobile-bearing, third generation total ankle prosthesis.

BACKGROUND: The SALTO total ankle prosthesis is a noncemented mobile bearing anatomic design characterized by dual Ti-HA coating. This study reviews our results with this prosthesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, 413 consecutive SALTO prostheses were implanted in our institution in 215 women and 198 men, aged 57.1 +/- 11.9 years. At the last visit, 401 implants (47% in the left ankle) were available with a mean followup of 29 (range, 1 to 84) months. RESULTS: Based on the results of the 218 patients with at least 2 years of postoperative followup, the 5-year estimated survivorship, with the primary end-point being implant removal, was 86.6% and ranged from 85.1% in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis to 95.6% in those with rheumatoid arthritis. The AOFAS score increased from 50.9 +/- 16.8 points preoperatively to 82.2 +/- 14 points at followup (mean difference, 31.1 +/- 1.4, 95% confidence interval (C.I.) for the difference, 28.3 to 33.8, p < 0.001). Visual analog scale for pain decreased from 7.4 +/- 1.1 preoperatively to 2.0 +/- 2.0 postoperatively (mean difference, -5.4 +/- 0.7, 95% C.I. for the difference, -5.6 to -5.2, p < 0.001). Flexion/extension ROM increased from 25.2 +/- 14.1 degrees to 33.1 +/- 13.6 degrees at the last followup visit (mean difference, 7.9 +/- 0.5 degrees, 95% C.I. for the difference, 4.3 to 7.2, p < 0.001), while pronation/supination ROM increased from 23.8 +/- 13.7 degrees to 25.4 +/- 14.5 degrees (mean difference, 1.6 +/- 0.7 degrees, 95% C.I. for the difference, 0.9 to 2.2, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The SALTO prosthesis provided good clinical and functional results and we believe helps validate the concept of anatomic replacement.

Short-term results after reversed shoulder arthroplasty (Delta III) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and irreparable rotator cuff tear.

The purpose of this study was to describe the outcome after reversed Delta III shoulder prosthesis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and irreparable rotator cuff tear. Fifteen patients (17 joints) were prospectively analysed using the Constant-Murley score (CS). Comprehensive outcome measure was carried out by means of four widely used questionnaires as well as clinical and radiographic examinations at an average of 24.3 months postoperatively. The CS improved significantly from 19 to 59.5 points. The mental (MSC) and physical (PCS) component summary score of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) reached 108% and 77%, respectively, while the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) was 58% of a comparative norm population. Remaining deficits were documented by SPADI (Shoulder Pain and Disability; 54.4 points) and ASES (clinical and patient-orientated American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; 84.3 and 61.3 points, respectively). No radiological signs of loosening were found, but scapular notching occurred in four cases. Reversed arthroplasty provides a substantial improvement of shoulder function in patients with RA. The high incidence of notching is of concern.

[Supramalleolar, subtractive valgus osteotomy of the tibia in the management of ankle joint degeneration with varus deformity]. / Die supramalleoläre, subtraktive, valgisierende Tibiaosteotomie bei Varusarthrose des Sprunggelenks.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of supramalleolar osteotomy of the tibia in the management of varus deformity of the upper ankle joint is to shift load bearing away from the severely degenerated medial part of the joint to the lateral part and thus restore physiological alignment of the hindfoot and a plantigrade foot. The intention is to reduce pain and to postpone the need for total endoprosthesis or arthrodesis. INDICATIONS: Painful degeneration of the ankle joint with varus deformity that has proven resistant to conservative treatment, i.e., > 15 degrees axial malalignment of the tibiotalar joint axis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Severe ankle joint degeneration that restricts movement. Florid infections. Extensive bone and soft-tissue defects. Osteonecrosis of the talus with necrotic regions > 50%. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Anterior approach to the upper ankle joint and supramalleolar wedge-shaped resection of a predetermined bone wedge with lateral base. The desired correction is precisely calculated during preoperative planning. Subsequently, lateral approach over the distal fibula. Resection of a more proximal segment from the fibula. Closure of the tibial osteotomy (closed wedge) and osteosynthesis of the fibula. RESULTS: A supramalleolar valgus osteotomy (closed wedge) was performed in 27 patients from 2002 to 2006. Preoperatively, there was an average varus deformity of 27 degrees , which was corrected to 6 degrees on average postoperatively. 21 patients were very satisfied at follow-up, three patients required joint replacement during the later course, and another three patients needed arthrodesis.