Springs Produce Favorable Morphological Outcomes Relative to H-craniectomy According to a Two-center Comparison of Matched Cases.

BACKGROUND: Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of premature suture closure, and many surgical techniques are used to correct scaphocephalic skull shape. Given the rarity of direct comparisons of different surgical techniques for correcting craniosynostosis, this study compared outcomes of craniotomy combined with springs and H-craniectomy for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. METHODS: Comparisons were performed using available pre- and postoperative imaging and follow-up data from the two craniofacial national referral centers in Sweden, which perform two different surgical techniques: craniotomy combined with springs (Gothenburg) and H-craniectomy (Renier's technique; Uppsala). The study included 23 pairs of patients matched for sex, preoperative cephalic index (CI), and age. CI, total intracranial volume (ICV), and partial ICV were measured before surgery and at 3 years of age, with volume measurements compared against those of pre- and postoperative controls. Perioperative data included operation time, blood loss, volume of transfused blood, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Craniotomy combined with springs resulted in less bleeding and lower transfusion rates than H-craniectomy. Although the spring technique requires two operations, the mean total operation time was similar for both methods. Of the three complications that occurred in the group treated with springs, two were spring-related. Importantly, the compiled analysis of changes in CI and partial volume distribution revealed that craniotomy combined with springs resulted in superior morphological correction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that craniotomy combined with springs normalized cranial morphology to a greater extent than H-craniectomy based on changes in CI and total and partial ICVs over time.

Treatment of orbital fractures - a critical analysis of ophthalmic outcomes and scenarios for re-intervention.

BACKGROUND: Malplaced implants in orbital reconstruction may lead to serious complications and necessitate re-intervention. The aim of this study was to describe outcomes, complications and scenarios of re-intervention in a historical case series of orbital fractures treated with free-hand orbital wall reconstruction. The main hypothesis was that early re-interventions are mainly because of malplaced implants in the posterior orbit. METHODS: Retrospective review of 90 patients with facial fractures involving the orbit, reconstructed with radiopaque orbital wall implants, from 2011 to 2016. Data were obtained from medical records and computed tomography images. Recorded parameters were fracture type, ocular injury, ocular motility, diplopia, eye position, complications and re-interventions. Secondary reconstructions because of enophthalmos were volumetrically evaluated. RESULTS: Early complications requiring re-intervention within 1 month were seen in 12 (13%) patients, where all except two were because of malplaced implants. The implant incongruence was without exception found in the posterior orbit. Late complications consisted of four (4%) cases of ectropion and five (5%) cases of entropion that needed corrective surgery. The majority of the patients with eye-lid complications had undergone repeated surgeries. Secondary orbital surgeries were performed in nine (10%) patients. Five of these patients had secondary reconstruction for enophthalmos and associated diplopia. None of these patients became completely free from either enophthalmos or diplopia after the secondary surgery. CONCLUSION: Re-intervention after orbital reconstruction is mainly related to malplaced implants in the posterior orbit. Incomplete results in patients requiring secondary surgery for enophthalmos infer the importance of accurate restoration of the orbit at primary surgery. Abstract presented at: Swedish surgery Week 2021 and SCAPLAS 2022.

Persistent discrepancies in orbital morphology after surgical treatment of unicoronal craniosynostosis: a critical image-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is characterized by complex orbital deformity and is typically treated by asymmetrical fronto-orbital remodeling (FOR) during the 1st year of life. The aim of this study was to elucidate to what extent orbital morphology is corrected by surgical treatment. METHODS: The extent to which orbital morphology was corrected by surgical treatment was tested by analysis of differences in volume and shape between synostotic, nonsynostotic, and control orbits at two time points. In total, 147 orbits were analyzed from patient CT images obtained preoperatively (mean age 9.3 months), at follow-up (mean age 3.0 years), and in matched controls. Semiautomatic segmentation software was used to determine orbital volume. For analysis of orbital shape and asymmetry, geometrical models, signed distance maps, principal modes of variation, and three objective parameters (mean absolute distance, Hausdorff distance, and dice similarity coefficient) were generated by statistical shape modeling. RESULTS: Orbital volumes on both the synostotic and nonsynostotic sides were significantly smaller at follow-up than volumes in controls and significantly smaller both preoperatively and at follow-up than orbital volumes on the nonsynostotic side. Significant differences in shape were identified globally and locally, both preoperatively and at 3 years of age. Compared with controls, deviations were mostly found on the synostotic side at both time points. Asymmetry between synostotic and nonsynostotic sides was significantly decreased at follow-up, but not compared with the inherent asymmetry of controls. On a group level, the preoperative synostotic orbit was mainly expanded in the anterosuperior and anteroinferior regions and smallest on the temporal side. At follow-up, the mean synostotic orbit was still larger superiorly but also expanded in the anteroinferior temporal region. Overall, the morphology of nonsynostotic orbits was more similar to that of controls than to synostotic orbits. However, the individual variation in orbital shape was greatest for nonsynostotic orbits at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the authors presented what is, to their knowledge, the first objective automatic 3D bony evaluation of orbital shape in UCS, defining in greater detail than has been done previously how synostotic orbits differ from nonsynostotic and control orbits, and how orbital shape changes from 9.3 months of age preoperatively to 3 years of age at the postoperative follow-up. Despite surgical treatment, both local and global deviations in shape persist. These findings may have implications for future directions in the development of surgical treatment. Future studies connecting orbital morphology to ophthalmic disorders, aesthetics, and genetics could provide further insight to enable better outcomes in UCS.