Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 67
Filter
1.
Ann Oncol ; 23(1): 256-263, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21471565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment data for prostate cancer can be obtained from a variety of sources. Each of these sources has its own strengths and weaknesses and is subject to error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a population-based cohort of 319 prostate cancer patients, data on treatment were obtained from five sources: two patient interviews at 6 and 12 months after diagnosis, primary caregiver interviews, physician questionnaires, and medical records. Inter-reporting agreement and accuracy of reporting (compared with medical records) were assessed. Multivariate analyses examined patient, caregiver, and physician characteristics as determinants of reporting error. RESULTS: The agreement among different reporting methods was generally good to excellent for prostatectomy and brachytherapy (kappa range 0.70-0.90) and fair to good (kappa range 0.35-0.75) for external beam radiation and hormonal treatment. Compared with medical records, the interview- and questionnaire-based data collection methods were more accurate for prostatectomy and brachytherapy than for external beam radiation and hormonal therapy. Using medical records as the 'gold standard', patient and caregiver interviews at 6 months after the diagnosis had higher sensitivity and specificity than other reporting sources. CONCLUSION: Interviews of prostate cancer patients and caregivers are useful alternatives to medical record abstraction, particularly if carried out during, or soon after, treatment.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Patients , Physicians , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Self Report , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Urology ; 77(4): 927-33, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21334050

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To perform a population-based study on the quality of life (QOL) after prostate cancer treatment in a rural and disadvantaged population, because these have been sparse. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study of 260 men with incident prostate cancer in a largely rural area of Southwest Georgia. The subjects underwent interviews at baseline and 6 and 12 months after the diagnosis. The analyses compared the 6- and 12-month QOL to that at baseline using linear and Poisson regression analyses for longitudinal data. RESULTS: Across all treatment groups, the self-reported physical and emotional QOL declined significantly after treatment, with little difference between that at 6 and that at 12 months. The decline in physical/emotional QOL did not differ by age, race, education, or Gleason score but was more pronounced among those with no comorbidities. Patients treated with hormones showed the worst deterioration in physical and emotional QOL, with the watchful waiting and external beam radiotherapy groups were the least affected. After 12 months, the percentage of men reporting that sexual, urinary, and bowel function was a large or very large problem was 53%, 22%, and 9% compared with 27%, 25%, and 4% at baseline, respectively. Worse bowel and urinary function played a stronger role than sexual function in predicting the overall physical and emotional QOL. Urinary obstruction improved but incontinence worsened. The doctors' and patients' assessment of the QOL showed only a low correlation, with patients reporting worse post-treatment QOL than the doctors. CONCLUSIONS: The general and most prostate-specific QOL measures (except for urinary function) in this previously understudied population declined after 6 months and remained about the same at 12 months after treatment of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Brachytherapy , Georgia , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Watchful Waiting
3.
J Community Health ; 36(4): 505-12, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21107893

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to explore racial differences related to treatment-based beliefs (trust in physician, physician bias, access to care, and self-efficacy) and coping (religious coping and social support). The study was conducted in a 33-county area located in southwest Georgia (SWGA). Men living in SWGA and newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were invited to participate in the study. Men were also required to be 75 years of age or younger at the beginning of the study and free of dementia. In collaboration with the Georgia Cancer Registry, potentially eligible participants were identified through pathology reports. Participants completed three interviews during a 12-month period post-diagnosis. The 320 participants in this analysis ranged in age from 44 to 75 years with a mean age of 63 years, and 42% were African American. After controlling for confounders, African American participants were more likely to report physician bias, financial problems with access to care, and use of religious coping strategies. These results, based on a largely rural patient population, support those of other studies noting differences in perception of care, access to care, and coping strategies between African American and white men with prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health/ethnology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Satisfaction/ethnology , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Family Relations , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Religion and Psychology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Br J Cancer ; 93(3): 364-71, 2005 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16079783

ABSTRACT

Reproductive factors are associated with reduced risk of breast cancer, but less is known about whether there is differential protection against subtypes of breast cancer. Assuming reproductive factors act through hormonal mechanisms they should protect predominantly against cancers expressing oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors. We examined the effect of reproductive factors on subgroups of tumours defined by hormone receptor status as well as histology using data from the NIHCD Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences (CARE) Study, a multicenter case-control study of breast cancer. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as measures of relative risk using multivariate unconditional logistic regression methods. Multiparity and early age at first birth were associated with reduced relative risk of ER + PR + tumours (P for trend=0.0001 and 0.01, respectively), but not of ER - PR - tumours (P for trend=0.27 and 0.85), whereas duration of breastfeeding was associated with lower relative risk of both receptor-positive (P for trend=0.0002) and receptor-negative tumours (P=0.0004). Our results were consistent across subgroups of women based on age and ethnicity. We found few significant differences by histologic subtype, although the strongest protective effect of multiparity was seen for mixed ductolobular tumours. Our results indicate that parity and age at first birth are associated with reduced risk of receptor-positive tumours only, while lactation is associated with reduced risk of both receptor-positive and -negative tumours. This suggests that parity and lactation act through different mechanisms. This study also suggests that reproductive factors have similar protective effects on breast tumours of lobular and ductal origin.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Receptors, Estrogen , Receptors, Progesterone , Adult , Age Factors , Breast Feeding , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Female , Gravidity , Humans , Middle Aged , Parity , Risk Factors , Time Factors
5.
Eur J Cancer ; 40(4): 579-84, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14962726

ABSTRACT

Data on five allergic conditions were abstracted from the medical records of 180 cases of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and 718 matched controls. Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were estimated for composite variables and for individual allergies using conditional logistic regression modelling. Allergies were divided into late and early diagnoses (those made within the year before the matched case's ALL diagnosis and those made earlier, respectively). Among the early diagnoses, atopy or hives was significantly associated with ALL (OR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.16-4.16). Significant associations were found for late diagnoses of atopy or hives (OR=3.78; 95% CI: 1.00-14.29) and of asthma (OR=3.10; 95% CI: 1.39-6.95). None of the other allergic conditions were associated with ALL. These results are contrary to those of prior studies of childhood ALL and allergy.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity/complications , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors
6.
Br J Cancer ; 87(11): 1234-45, 2002 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12439712

ABSTRACT

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Developing Countries , Smoking/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Epidemiologic Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(11): 1119-27, 2001 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11390332

ABSTRACT

Random digit dialing is used frequently in epidemiologic case-control studies to select population-based controls, even when both cases and controls are interviewed face-to-face. However, concerns persist about the potential biases of random digit dialing, particularly given its generally lower response rates. In an Atlanta, Georgia, case-control study of breast cancer among women aged 20-54 years, all of whom were interviewed face-to-face, two statistically independent control groups were compared: those obtained through random digit dialing (n = 652) and those obtained through area probability sampling (n = 640). The household screening rate was significantly higher for the area sample, by 5.5%. Interview response rates were comparable. The telephone sample estimated a significantly larger percentage (by approximately 7%) of households to have no age-eligible women. Both control groups, appropriately weighted, had characteristics similar to US Census demographic characteristics for Atlanta women, except that respondents in both control groups were more educated and more likely to be married. The authors conclude that households contacted through random digit dialing are somewhat less likely to participate in the household screening process, and if they are cooperative, some households may not disclose that age-eligible women reside therein. Investigators need to develop improved methods for screening and enumerating household members in random digit dialing surveys that target a specific subpopulation, such as women.


Subject(s)
Epidemiologic Methods , Telephone , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Sampling Studies , Selection Bias
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(2): 114-22, 2001 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11159155

ABSTRACT

Data from a population-based case-control study were used to evaluate the relation between social class factors and squamous cell esophageal cancer and the extent to which alcohol, tobacco, diet, and low income contribute to the higher incidence among Black men than among White men in the United States. A total of 347 male cases (119 White, 228 Black) and 1,354 male controls (743 White, 611 Black) were selected from three US geographic areas (Atlanta, Georgia, Detroit, Michigan, and New Jersey). Cases were residents of the study areas aged 30-79 years who had been diagnosed with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer between 1986 and 1989. The adjusted odds ratios for subjects with annual incomes less than $10,000 versus incomes of $25,000 or more were 4.3 (95% confidence interval: 2.1, 8.7) for Whites and 8.0 (95% confidence interval: 4.3, 15.0) for Blacks. The combination of all four major risk factors-low income, moderate/heavy alcohol intake, tobacco use, and infrequent consumption of raw fruits and vegetables-accounted for almost all of the squamous cell esophageal cancers in Whites (98%) and Blacks (99%) and for 99% of the excess incidence among Black men. Thus, lifestyle modifications, especially a lowered intake of alcoholic beverages, would markedly decrease the incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer in both racial groups and would narrow the racial disparity in risk. Further studies on the determinants of social class may help to identify a new set of exposures for this tumor that are amenable to intervention.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , Social Class , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Diet/adverse effects , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Life Style , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Population Surveillance , Poverty/ethnology , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/adverse effects , White People/statistics & numerical data
9.
Ann Epidemiol ; 10(7): 468, 2000 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11018394

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between social class factors and squamous cell esophageal cancer and the extent to which alcohol, tobacco, diet, and social class contribute to the five-fold higher incidence among black than white men in the United States.METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 347 incident cases of squamous cell esophageal cancer (119 white males and 228 black males) and 1354 population-based controls (743 white males and 611 black males) from Atlanta, Detroit, and New Jersey. Risks were estimated using unconditional logistic regression controlling for potential confounders.RESULTS: Elevated risks of squamous cell esophageal cancer were associated with indicators of low social class, especially low annual income. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for subjects with incomes < $10,000 versus incomes of $25,000 or more were 4.3 (95% CI = 2.1-8.7) for whites and 8.0 (95% CI = 4.3-15.0) for blacks. The combination of all four major risk factors: annual income less than $25,000, moderate/heavy use of alcohol, use of tobacco for six months or longer, and consumption of less than 2.5 servings of raw fruits and vegetables per day accounted for almost all of the squamous cell esophageal cancers in whites (98%) and blacks (99%), and for 99% of the excess incidence among black men.CONCLUSIONS: Lifestyle modifications, especially a lower intake of alcoholic beverages, would markedly decrease the incidence of this cancer in both races and narrow the racial disparity in risk. Further studies into the determinants of social class may help identify a new set of exposures for this tumor that are amendable to intervention.

10.
Am J Public Health ; 90(8): 1277-81, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10937009

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and risk of multiple myeloma among Blacks and Whites in the United States. METHODS: This population-based case-control study included 573 cases (206 Blacks and 367 Whites) with new diagnoses of multiple myeloma identified between August 1, 1986, and April 30, 1989, and 2131 controls (967 Blacks and 1164 Whites) from 3 US geographic areas. Information on occupation, income, and education was obtained by personal interview. RESULTS: Inverse gradients in risk were associated with occupation-based SES, income, and education. Risks were significantly elevated for subjects in the lowest categories of occupation-based SES (odds ratio [OR] = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16, 2.53), education (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.06, 1.75), and income (OR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.93). Occupation-based low SES accounted for 37% of multiple myeloma in Blacks and 17% in Whites, as well as 49% of the excess incidence in Blacks. Low education and low income accounted for 17% and 28% of the excess incidence in Blacks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the measured SES-related factors account for a substantial amount of the Black-White differential in multiple myeloma incidence.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Myeloma/epidemiology , Social Class , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
11.
J Urol ; 163(4): 1138-43, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10737483

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We determine the positive yield of imaging studies performed on men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, population based survey was conducted on 3,690 men with prostate cancer diagnosed between October 1, 1994 and October 31, 1995. Cases were identified by the rapid case ascertainment systems used in 6 geographic regions participating in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Based on information captured in primary medical record reviews we estimated the positive yield of bone scans, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The positive yield of bone scan and CT was less than 5% and 12%, respectively, for all men with prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4 to 20 ng./ml., and less than 2% and 9%, respectively, for those who also had a Gleason score of 6 or less. Only men with PSA greater than 50 ng./ml. and those with Gleason scores 8 to 10 and PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. had positive yields greater than 10% and 20% for bone scan and CT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging studies designed to identify metastases and/or extracapsular extension in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer frequently have a low positive yield. Wide variations exist in the use of imaging studies and are associated with tumor factors, such as Gleason score and serum PSA, and nontumor factors, such as state of residence. More extensive cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to define appropriate guidelines for ordering imaging studies to optimize the positive yield among men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Radionuclide Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
12.
Br J Cancer ; 82(3): 718-25, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10682688

ABSTRACT

A population-based case-control study was carried out among 981 men (479 black, 502 white) with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1315 controls (594 black, 721 white). In-person interviews elicited information on sexual behaviour and other potential risk factors for prostate cancer. Blood was drawn for serologic studies in a subset of the cases (n = 276) and controls (n = 295). Prostate cancer risk was increased among men who reported a history of gonorrhoea or syphilis (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6; 95% confidence internal (CI) 1.2-2.1) or showed serological evidence of syphilis (MHA-TP) (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.0-3.5). Patterns of risk for gonorrhoea and syphilis were similar for blacks (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and whites (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 0.8-3.2). Risks increased with increasing occurrences of gonorrhoea, rising to OR = 3.3 (95% CI 1.4-7.8) among subjects with three or more events (Ptrend = 0.0005). Frequent sexual encounters with prostitutes and failure to use condoms were also associated with increased risk. Syphilis, gonorrhoea, sex with prostitutes and unprotected sexual intercourse may be indicators of contact with a sexually transmissible factor that increases the risk of prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Sexual Behavior , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/complications , White People
13.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 91(19): 1654-62, 1999 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10511593

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is effective in treating breast cancer, reduces breast cancer incidence among high-risk women, and is associated with increased endometrial cancer risk. This study was designed to examine the possible modifying effects of endometrial cancer risk factors on the tamoxifen-endometrial cancer association. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of endometrial cancer (324 case patients and 671 individually matched control subjects) nested within a population-based cohort of patients with breast cancer diagnosed from 1978 through 1992 within four regions of the United States. We obtained information on breast cancer treatment and endometrial cancer risk factors through interviews and reviews of medical records. All P values reported are two-sided. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer risk was associated with tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer (odds ratio = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1. 07-2.17). Risk increased with duration of tamoxifen use (P for trend =.0002). Women with more than 5 years of exposure to tamoxifen had 4. 06-fold greater odds of developing endometrial cancer than nonusers (95% CI = 1.74-9.47). Prior use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) increased risk associated with tamoxifen use (P for homogeneity of trends <.0001). Risk associated with tamoxifen use was stronger among heavier women than among thinner women, although trends did not differ statistically (P =.10). Tamoxifen dose-response effects were more pronounced among women with both previous ERT exposure and higher body mass index than among women in other risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: ERT use and obesity, both established endometrial cancer risk factors and markers of estrogen exposure, substantially modify the association between tamoxifen use and endometrial cancer risk among patients with breast cancer. Women with positive ERT histories and those who are obese, when prescribed tamoxifen, may warrant closer surveillance for endometrial cancer than women without such histories.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemically induced , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/adverse effects , Tamoxifen/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Endometrial Neoplasms/etiology , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk , Risk Factors , SEER Program , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Time Factors
15.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 8(1): 25-34, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9950236

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men in the United States, with substantially higher rates among American blacks than whites. We carried out a population-based case-control study in three geographic areas of the United States to evaluate the reasons for the racial disparity in incidence rates. A total of 932 men (449 black men and 483 white men) who had been newly diagnosed with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and 1201 controls (543 black men and 658 white men) were interviewed in person to elicit information on potential risk factors. This report evaluates the impact of dietary factors, particularly the consumption of animal products and animal fat, on the risk of prostate cancer among blacks and whites in the United States. Increased consumption (grams/day) of foods high in animal fat was linked to prostate cancer (independent of intake of other calories) among American blacks [by quartile of intake, odds ratio (OR) = 1.0 (referent), 1.5, 2.1, and 2.0; Ptrend = 0.007], but not among American whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 1.6, 1.5, and 1.1; Ptrend = 0.90]. However, risks for advanced prostate cancer were higher with greater intake of foods high in animal fat among blacks [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 4.2, and 3.1; Ptrend = 0.006] and whites [by quartile of intake, OR = 1.0 (referent), 2.2, 2.6, and 2.4; Ptrend = 0.02]. Increased intake of animal fat as a proportion of total caloric intake also showed positive but weaker associations with advanced prostate cancer among blacks (Ptrend = 0.13) and whites (Ptrend = 0.08). No clear associations were found with vitamin A, calcium, or specific lycopene-rich foods. The study linked greater consumption of fat from animal sources to increased risk for prostate cancer among American blacks and to advanced prostate cancer among American blacks and whites. A reduction of fat from animal sources in the diet could lead to decreased incidence and mortality rates for prostate cancer, particularly among American blacks.


Subject(s)
Black People , Feeding Behavior , Prostatic Neoplasms/etiology , White People , Adult , Black or African American , Aged , Animals , Antioxidants/administration & dosage , Calcium/administration & dosage , Carotenoids/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/adverse effects , Energy Intake , Humans , Incidence , Lycopene , Male , Meat , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States , Vitamin A/administration & dosage
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 34(5): 421-30, 1998 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9787845

ABSTRACT

Although prostate cancer is a major disease, causal factors are only partially understood. We examined occupational risk factors for this disease in a large case control study among U.S. blacks and whites. The study included 981 new pathologically confirmed prostate cancer cases (479 blacks and 502 whites) diagnosed between 1986 and 1989, and 1,315 population controls (594 blacks and 721 whites) who resided in Atlanta, Detroit, and 10 countries in New Jersey, covered by population-based cancer registries. Information on occupation, including a lifetime work history, was collected by in-person interview. No clear patterns of risk were found for U.S. whites versus blacks, nor for white-collar versus blue-collar jobs. Farming was related to prostate cancer (OR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.18-3.98). Risk was restricted, however, to short-term workers and workers in crop production. Risk was not limited to those farming after 1950, when widespread use of pesticides started. Risks increased with increasing years of employment in firefighting (chi 2trend, p = 0.02) and power plant operations (chi 2trend, p = 0.03), and were elevated among long-term railroad line-haulers (OR = 5.85; 95% CI = 1.25-27.4); jobs with potential polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposures. Risk was elevated among athletes (OR = 5.38; 95% CI = 1.48-19.6). However, most of the cases were athletes before 1960, so the potential use of anabolic steroids was excluded. Although some clues about potential occupational associations were found, the overall results show that occupation is not a major determinant of prostate cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Georgia/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , New Jersey/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Time Factors
17.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(5): 467-74, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934713

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate dietary factors for squamous cell esophageal cancer and whether these factors may contribute to the five-fold higher incidence of this cancer in the black versus white population of the United States. METHODS: Data from a food frequency questionnaire were analyzed for 114 white men and 219 black men with squamous cell esophageal cancer, and 681 white and 557 black male controls from three areas of the United States who participated in a population-based case-control study of esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Protective effects were associated with intake of raw fruits and vegetables (odds ratio for high versus low consumers = 0.3 in both white and black men) and use of vitamin supplements (especially vitamin C; odds ratio for high versus low consumers = 0.4 in both races), with the frequency of consumption of raw fruits and vegetables and vitamin supplements being greater for white than black controls. In addition, elevated risks were associated with high versus low intake of red meat (OR = 2.7 for blacks and 1.5 for whites) and processed meat (OR = 1.6 for blacks and 1.7 for whites), with the levels of consumption being greater for black than white controls. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, these dietary factors may contribute in part to the much higher incidence of squamous cell esophageal cancer among black compared to white men.


Subject(s)
Black People , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Diet , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , White People , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Confidence Intervals , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Fruit , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Vegetables
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(4): 605-9, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9242476

ABSTRACT

To evaluate whether the fivefold greater incidence rate of squamous-cell esophageal cancer in Black compared with White men is due to type of alcoholic beverage consumed or to other qualitative differences in alcohol consumption, we conducted a population-based case-control study with 373 males diagnosed with squamous-cell esophageal cancer (124 Whites and 249 Blacks) and 1,364 male controls (750 Whites and 614 Blacks) from three geographic areas in the United States. Included were all histologically confirmed cases newly diagnosed from 1 August 1986 through 30 April 1989, among White and Black men aged 30 to 79 years. Risks varied to some extent according to type of alcohol used, with beer a stronger contributor in Whites, and wine and liquor stronger contributors in Blacks. However, most of the differences in the odds ratios by type of alcohol and race were eliminated after controlling for average weekly amount of total alcohol consumed. Thus, while alcohol use in all forms is an important risk factor for squamous-cell esophageal cancer in Whites and Blacks, type of alcoholic beverage used does not appear to account for the racial differences in incidence.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholic Beverages/classification , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/ethnology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/ethnology , Case-Control Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/ethnology , Georgia , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan , Middle Aged , New Jersey , Odds Ratio
19.
Cancer Causes Control ; 8(4): 610-4, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9242477

ABSTRACT

In the United States, the incidence rates of multiple myeloma in Blacks are more than twice those in Whites, but the etiology of this cancer is poorly understood. A population-based case-control interview study of 571 subjects (365 White, 206 Black) with multiple myeloma and 2,122 controls (1,155 White, 967 Black) living in three areas of the United States (Georgia, Michigan, New Jersey) offered the opportunity to investigate the relationship with smoking and alcohol drinking and to evaluate whether these factors might contribute to the excess risk of multiple myeloma in Blacks. For Blacks and Whites of either gender, there were no significantly elevated risks associated with ever use of cigarettes or alcoholic beverages and no consistent patterns with either intensity or duration of use. These data support previous studies indicating that smoking and drinking are not related causally to the risk of multiple myeloma, and thus cannot account for the racial disparity in incidence rates.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Black or African American , Multiple Myeloma/ethnology , Multiple Myeloma/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , White People , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Georgia , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan , New Jersey , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Am J Prev Med ; 13(1): 51-7, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9037342

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine if an in-home educational intervention conducted by lay health workers (LHWs) could increase adherence among low-income, inner-city, African-American women to breast and cervical cancer screening schedules. METHODS: We recruited 321 African-American women from diverse inner-city sources. After baseline interviews, they were randomly assigned to either the intervention (n = 163) or the control (n = 158) group. Those in the intervention group were visited in their homes up to three times by LHWs who provided a culturally sensitive educational program that emphasized the need for screening. RESULTS: Ninety-three (93) women in the intervention group and 102 in the control group completed the postintervention interview. For Pap smears, the increase in screening was similar in both groups. For clinical breast exams (CBEs), however, there was a modest increase in the intervention group. The improvement was greatest for mammography, for which there was a 10% to 12% increase. Among women who were not on recommended schedules at baseline, the improvement was substantial and greater in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: LHWs' intervention appeared to improve the rate at which inner-city women obtained CBEs and mammograms, but had no effect on Pap smears. A high attrition rate weakened our ability to make conclusive statements about the exact impact of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Community Health Workers , Health Education/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Self-Examination , Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Georgia , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Poverty , Urban Population , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/ethnology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...