Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
J Sep Sci ; 47(3): e2300696, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38356232

ABSTRACT

Although filtration is one of the most common steps in sample preparation for chemical analysis, filter membrane materials can leach contaminants and/or retain some analytes in the filtered solutions. In multiclass, multiresidue analysis of veterinary drugs, it is challenging to find one type of filter membrane that does not retain at least some of the analytes before injection in ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). In this study, different filter membranes were tested for use in UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of 183 diverse drugs in bovine muscle, kidney, and liver tissues. Membranes evaluated consisted of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), polyethersulfone, nylon, and regenerated cellulose. Drug classes represented among the analytes included ß-agonists, ß-lactams, anthelmintics, macrolides, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, tranquilizers, (fluoro)quinolones, anti-inflammatories, nitroimidazoles, coccidiostats, phenicols, and others. Although the presence of a matrix helped reduce the binding of analytes on surface active sites, all of the filter types partially retained at least some of the drugs in the final extracts. In testing by flow-injection analysis, all of the membrane filters were also observed to leach interfering components. Ultimately, filtration was avoided altogether in the final sample preparation approach known as the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe, efficient, and robust (QuEChERSER) mega-method, and ultracentrifugation was chosen as an alternative.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Cattle , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Chromatography, Liquid , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37582153

ABSTRACT

Analyte stability is more commonly a confounding factor in analytical chemistry than many analysts recognize. In this study, we assessed the stability of 31 common veterinary drugs in water and final extracts of bovine (milk and kidney/liver) and chicken (muscle and egg) matrices. Two different sample preparation methods were evaluated for one-month storage of the final extracts at typical room, refrigerator, and freezer temperatures. Liquid chromatography - mass spectrometry (LC-MS) by triple quadrupole and high-resolution techniques was used for analysis of the extracts spiked at different relevant concentrations for general regulatory purposes (10-1000 ng/g sample equivalent). Comparison of results between two labs demonstrated that stable drugs (≤20% loss) at all tested conditions consisted of danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, flubendazole, hydroxy-flubendazole, flumequine, flunixin, 5-hydroxy-flunixin, lincomycin, and meloxicam. The tested drugs found to be the most unstable (>20% loss at room temperature within a matter of days) consisted of the ß-lactams (ampicillin, cefalexin, cloxacillin, and penicillin G). Curiously, the following antibiotics (mostly macrolides) were apparently more stable in sample extracts than water: emamectin, erythromycin, ivermectin, lasalocid, monensin, tilmicosin, tulathromycin, and tylosin. Those and the other drug analytes (ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, florfenicol amine, 2-amino-flubendazole, oxytetracycline, sulfadiazine, sulfadimethoxine, sulfamethazine, and trimethoprim) were mostly stable for a month in refrigerated extracts, especially at higher concentrations, but not in all cases. In practice, freezer storage of extract solutions was found to be acceptable for at least a month, with a few exceptions.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Cattle , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis , Water/analysis
3.
Anal Methods ; 14(28): 2761-2770, 2022 07 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788773

ABSTRACT

Analysis of chemical residues in foods is a big challenge for developing countries due to lack of financial and professional resources needed to meet international quality standards for trade. However, the implementation of simple multiclass, multi-residue methods in monitoring programs can provide significant benefits to save cost, time, and labor. The aim of this project was to investigate the "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe, efficient, and robust" (QuEChERSER) mega-method for the fatty muscle matrices of goat and lamb. To achieve wide analytical scope covering pesticides, environmental contaminants, and veterinary drugs, extracts were analyzed by both ultrahigh-performance liquid and low-pressure gas chromatography (UHPLC and LPGC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The QuEChERSER mega-method was validated in ovine (goat) and caprine (lamb) muscles at four different spiking levels with 10 replicates per level for a total of 330 analytes and metabolites, consisting of 225 pesticides, 89 veterinary drugs, and 16 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In the case of LPGC-MS/MS (preceded by automated "instrument-top sample preparation"), 92% and 82% of the analytes met the data quality objectives of 70-120% recovery and <20% RSD for goat and lamb, respectively. For UHPLC-MS/MS, 95% and 92% of the analytes met the acceptable validation criteria in goat and lamb, respectively. Thus, the QuEChERSER mega-method has been demonstrated to be a useful streamlined approach to more efficiently replace multiple methods currently used to cover the same analytical scope.


Subject(s)
Pesticides , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Goats , Pesticides/analysis , Sheep , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081327

ABSTRACT

Diverse food safety programmes around the world are designed to help ensure production of safe food. To meet this need, the development and implementation of more efficient and effective analytical methods to monitor residues (pesticides and veterinary drugs) and contaminants in food is important. In this study, we report the validation results for a simple high-throughput mega-method for residual analysis of 213 pesticides and veterinary drugs, including 15 metabolites, plus 12 environmental contaminants (polychlorinated biphenyls) in tilapia muscle for implementation in routine laboratory analyses. The generic sample preparation method and analytical approach are known as QuEChERSER (more than QuEChERS). A small portion of the initial extract (204 µL) is taken for analysis by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) covering 145 analytes, and the remaining extract undergoes a salting out step followed by an automated robotic instrument top sample preparation (ITSP) cleanup, also known as micro-solid-phase extraction (µSPE), plus fast low-pressure gas chromatography LPGC-MS/MS for 134 analytes (66 pesticides are targeted in both UHPLC-MS/MS and LPGC-MS/MS). The mega-method was validated in spiked tilapia samples at 5, 10, 15, and 20 ng/g with 10 replicates per level over two days (n = 80 overall), and 70-140% recoveries with RSDs ≤20% were achieved for 92% of the analytes in LC and 82% in GC. No significant matrix effects were observed for the analytes in LPGC-MS/MS, and only 5% of the analytes exceeded ±20% matrix effect in UHPLC-MS/MS. Analysis of standard reference materials (NIST SRMs 1946 and 1947) for contaminants in freeze-dried fish showed acceptable results, further demonstrating that the QuEChERSER mega-method can be implemented to expand analytical scope and increase laboratory efficiency compared to the QuEChERS method.


Subject(s)
Cichlids , Environmental Pollutants , Pesticide Residues , Pesticides , Tilapia , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticides/analysis , Plant Extracts/analysis , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis
5.
J Chromatogr A ; 1645: 462097, 2021 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33848664

ABSTRACT

Hemp has been an agricultural commodity for millennia, and it has been undergoing a resurgence in interest and production due to its high content of cannabinoids, protein, fiber and other ingredients. For legal possession and use throughout the USA, hemp and hemp products must have delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration < 0.3%. As with most crops, pesticides may be applied when farming hemp, which need to be monitored in food, feed, and medicinal products. The aim of this work was to evaluate and validate the recently developed "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe, efficient, and robust" (QuEChERSER) sample preparation mega-method to determine pesticide residues in hemp plants, flowers, powders, oils, and pellets. High-throughput analysis of final extracts for 106 targeted pesticides and metabolites from North American monitoring lists entailed: 1) ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) with column back-flushing, and 2) instrument-top sample preparation + low-pressure gas chromatography (ITSP+LPGC-MS/MS). In QuEChERSER, 2 g sample is extracted with 10 mL 4/1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water by mechanical shaking for 10 min, followed by 3 min centrifugation. For LC, 0.2 mL of extract is taken and solvent exchanged into initial mobile phase followed by 5 min ultra-centrifugation prior to the 10 min analysis. For GC-amenable pesticides, the remaining initial extract is partitioned with 4/1 (w/w) anh. MgSO4/NaCl, and 1 mL is taken for automated ITSP cleanup in parallel with 10 min LPGC analysis. In the former case, the UHPLC column is back-flushed with 1/1 (v/v) methanol/acetonitrile for 3 min between each injection to keep the system clean and avoid ghost peaks. Multi-level, multi-day validation results achieved 70-120% recoveries with RSDs < 20% for more than 80% of the analytes in hemp protein powder, oil, pellets, and fresh plant (dried hemp plant and flower were too complex). Limits of quantification (LOQs) were < 10 ng/g were achieved for nearly all pesticides, yielding 2.8% false negatives among >13,000 analyte results in the spiked samples. The QuEChERSER method was demonstrated to meet the challenge for several complex hemp matrices.


Subject(s)
Cannabis/chemistry , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Plant Preparations/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Limit of Detection , Reproducibility of Results , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods
6.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 413(12): 3223-3241, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33713145

ABSTRACT

In 2018, AOAC International issued Standard Method Performance Requirements (SPMR) 2018.010 - Screening and Identification Method for Regulated Veterinary Drug Residues in Food. In response, we compared 4 different multiresidue methods of sample preparation using the same analytical method entailing ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Tilapia was chosen for testing, and the analytes and monitoring levels were from SPMR 2018.010. The methods consist of efficient procedures with published validation results from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), and an enhanced-matrix removal (EMR)-Lipid protocol from China. Each method was used to prepare 102 final extracts of tilapia spiked or not at different levels with the 78 targeted analytes plus metabolites. The same FDA/USDA rules of mass spectral identification were employed in all analyses to assess rates of false positives and negatives. Quantitative accuracy of the methods was also compared in terms of recoveries and reproducibility of spiked tilapia, incurred catfish, and spiked and certified reference material of bovine muscle. Each method yielded generally acceptable results for the targeted veterinary drugs, but the USDA "extract & inject" method was the fastest, simplest, and cheapest to achieve equally or more acceptable results for the widest scope of analytes for the tested food matrices.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues/analysis , Food Analysis/methods , Food Contamination/analysis , Tilapia , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Calibration , Cattle , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Quality Control , Red Meat/analysis , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/standards
7.
J Agric Food Chem ; 69(4): 1159-1168, 2021 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32442376

ABSTRACT

In this work, a new mega-method of sample preparation called "QuEChERSER" (more than QuEChERS) is being presented for the first time. Fast, efficient, and cost-effective analysis of chemical contaminants in meat is useful for international trade, domestic monitoring, risk assessment, and other purposes. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a simple high-throughput mega-method for residual analysis of 161 pesticides, 63 veterinary drugs, 24 metabolites, and 14 legacy environmental contaminants (polychlorinated biphenyls) in bovine muscle for implementation in routine laboratory analyses. Sample preparation of 2 g test portions entailed QuEChERS-based extraction with 10 mL of 4:1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water, and then 204 µL was taken, diluted, and ultracentrifuged prior to analysis of veterinary drugs and pesticides by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The remaining extract was salted out with 4:1 (w/w) anhydrous MgSO4/NaCl, and 1 mL was transferred to an autosampler vial for automated mini-cartridge solid-phase extraction (Instrument Top Sample Preparation) cleanup with immediate injection using fast low-pressure gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. The automated cleanup and both instruments were all operated in parallel in 13-15 min cycle times per sample. Method validation according to United States Department of Agriculture requirements demonstrated that 221 (85%) of the 259 analytes gave average recovery between 70 and 120% and interday relative standard deviation of ≤25%. Analysis of a certified reference material for veterinary drugs in freeze-dried bovine muscle was also very accurate, further demonstrating that the QuEChERSER mega-method can be implemented to save time, labor, and resources compared to current practices to use multiple methods to cover the same analytical scope.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Meat/analysis , Pesticides/analysis , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Environmental Pollutants/isolation & purification , Food Contamination/analysis , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticide Residues/isolation & purification , Pesticides/isolation & purification , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/methods , Veterinary Drugs/isolation & purification
8.
J Agric Food Chem ; 69(4): 1169-1174, 2021 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32442377

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study was to develop and validate a new method for simultaneous determination of 106 veterinary drugs and 227 pesticides and their metabolites plus 16 polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at and below their regulatory levels established for catfish muscle in the European Union and U.S.A. To do this, two different QuEChERS-based methods for veterinary drugs and pesticides and PCBs were modified and merged into a single mega-method dubbed "QuEChERSER" (more than QuEChERS), which is presented here for the first time. The mega-method was validated in catfish at four different spiking levels with 10 replicates per level. Sample extraction of 2 g test portions was made with 10 mL of 4:1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water, and then an aliquot was taken for ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) analysis of 106 veterinary drugs and 125 pesticides, including metabolites. The remaining extract after salting out was subjected to automated mini-solid-phase extraction cleanup (Instrument Top Sample Preparation) for immediate injection in low-pressure gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LPGC-MS/MS). The cleanup was conducted in parallel with the 10 min LPGC-MS/MS analysis for 167 PCBs, pesticides, and metabolites, which was conducted in parallel with the 10 min UHPLC-MS/MS analysis for 231 analytes to increase sample throughput (49 analytes were included in both techniques). In MS/MS, three ion transitions were monitored for nearly all targeted analytes to provide unambiguous identification as well as quantification. Satisfactory recoveries (70-120%) and relative standard deviations of ≤20% were achieved for 98 (92%) of the veterinary drugs and their metabolites and for 222 (91%) of pesticides, metabolites, and PCBs, demonstrating that the developed method is applicable for the analysis of these contaminants in fish as part of regulatory monitoring programs and other purposes.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Environmental Pollutants/analysis , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods , Meat/analysis , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticides/analysis , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Catfishes , Environmental Pollutants/isolation & purification , Food Contamination/analysis , Muscle, Skeletal/chemistry , Pesticide Residues/metabolism , Pesticides/isolation & purification , Robotics/instrumentation , Robotics/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/isolation & purification
9.
J AOAC Int ; 103(2): 584-606, 2020 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33241275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Validated analytical methods are needed to conduct regulatory monitoring of ready-to-eat meats and fish for food safety, risk assessment, and other purposes. The methods should be cost-effective, high-throughput, and meet acceptable performance standards for a wide scope of drugs and matrixes. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to demonstrate the validity for possible implementation in the US National Residue Program of an efficient method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of 176 targeted drugs at levels as low as 10 ng/g in hot dogs, catfish and swai (Siluriformes), chicken tenders, fried bacon, and sausage using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). METHODS: Sample preparation simply involved a 5 min extraction by shaking 2 g comminuted samples with 10 mL of 4/1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water followed by centrifugation and UHPLC-MS/MS analysis of 2 µL injections. For cleanup comparison purposes only, sausage extracts were also prepared using a cartridge-based EMR-Lipid method prior to analysis. RESULTS: Acceptable validation of 70-120% recoveries with <25% RSDs was met for 156-176 out of 186 drugs and quality control analytes without cleanup depending on the matrix. The EMR-Lipid method for sausage improved results for some analytes, such as mectin anthelmintics, due to reduction of indirectly interfering fats in the final extracts, but it also led to significantly worse results for several other drugs, resulting in 32 fewer analytes meeting the given validation criteria than without cleanup. CONCLUSIONS: The simple, high-throughput method was demonstrated to be valid to meet routine regulatory and other monitoring needs for many diverse targeted drugs in fish and ready-to-eat meat matrixes.


Subject(s)
Catfishes , Drug Residues , Meat Products , Veterinary Drugs , Animals , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Drug Residues/analysis , Meat/analysis , Plant Extracts , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Veterinary Drugs/analysis
10.
J Agric Food Chem ; 68(5): 1468-1479, 2020 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945291

ABSTRACT

In this study, sample processing of bulk commodities using an efficient one-step comminution procedure with liquid nitrogen (LN2) was devised and assessed in the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. LN2 was added to the fresh samples from a tank by opening a valve, and the standard food chopper was kept in a laboratory hood to reduce safety risks. Test portions of four replicates each of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 g were taken from eight fruits and vegetables (tomato, squash, broccoli, apple, grape, peach, green bean, and cucumber) individually comminuted with LN2. For comparison without comminution, similar test portions of a reconstituted freeze-dried certified reference material of pesticides in cucumber were also analyzed by the same method. More than 100 pesticides were monitored by both ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) and instrument top sample preparation (ITSP) + fast low-pressure gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LPGC-MS/MS). A new version of QuEChERS-based sample preparation was followed, in which 5 mL of 4:1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water per gram of sample is used for extraction and 200 µL of initial extract is quickly evaporated, reconstituted in water, and ultracentrifuged for UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. For ITSP+LPGC-MS/MS, another portion of the initial extract undergoes salt-out partitioning with 4:1 (w/w) anhydrous MgSO4/NaCl and the upper layer extract is transferred to an autosampler vial for automated cleanup and analysis in parallel. Quality control spikes were made during the comminution, extraction, cleanup, and analysis steps to isolate and estimate the individual and overall measurement uncertainties of the approach. The recommended test portion size is 2 g for routine monitoring by this approach, but results demonstrated that subsamples as low as 0.5 g typically gave overall biases and relative standard deviations of <10% for nearly all pesticides, commodities, and methods, which is 3-5% lower than previously evaluated sample processing and analytical methods. This approach can be used to improve data quality, laboratory efficiency, and sample throughput in routine monitoring programs for regulatory, risk assessment, and other purposes.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Fruit/chemistry , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Nitrogen/chemistry , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Vegetables/chemistry , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Quality Control , Sample Size , Tandem Mass Spectrometry
11.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 410(3): 1095-1109, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063165

ABSTRACT

The way to maximize scope of analysis, sample throughput, and laboratory efficiency in the monitoring of veterinary drug residues in food animals is to determine as many analytes as possible as fast as possible in as few methods as possible. Capital and overhead expenses are also reduced by using fewer instruments in the overall monitoring scheme. Traditionally, the highly polar aminoglycoside antibiotics require different chromatographic conditions from other classes of drugs, but in this work, we demonstrate that an ion-pairing reagent (sodium 1-heptanesulfonate) added to the combined final extracts from two sample preparation methods attains good separation of 174 targeted drugs, including 9 aminoglycosides, in the same 10.5-min ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) analysis. The full method was validated in bovine kidney, liver, and muscle tissues according to US regulatory protocols, and 137-146 (79-84%) of the drugs gave between 70 and 120% average recoveries with ≤ 25% RSDs in the different types of tissues spiked at 0.5, 1, and 2 times the regulatory levels of interest (10-1000 ng/g depending on the drug). This method increases sample throughput and the possible number of drugs monitored in the US National Residue Program, and requires only one UHPLC-MS/MS method and instrument for analysis rather than two by the previous scheme. Graphical abstract Outline of the streamlined approach to monitor 174 veterinary drugs, including aminoglycosides, in bovine tissues by combining two extracts of the same sample with an ion-pairing reagent for analysis by UHPLC-MS/MS.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Drug Residues/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Aminoglycosides/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cattle , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Drug Residues/pharmacokinetics , Food Analysis/methods , Limit of Detection , Tissue Distribution , Veterinary Drugs/pharmacokinetics
12.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 30(7): 813-22, 2016 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26969922

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Previously, we have reported a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the identification and quantification of regulated veterinary drugs in food animals. The method uses three selected transition ions per analyte but structural characterization is also needed. This work is a continuation of two previous publications in which we propose structures of the selected transition ions of 130 veterinary drugs altogether. METHODS: In this work, 24 additional veterinary drugs were analyzed by infusion into a high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive or negative mode. The TOF analyzer was calibrated to achieve low error mass accuracy in the MS and MS/MS modes. Also, the MS(2) and MS(3) spectra were obtained by using a Q-Trap mass spectrometer to further determine the possible pathways of ion formation. RESULTS: The low error mass spectrometry analysis allowed the elucidation of the ion formulae of selected transition ions for qualitative identification. The rational interpretation of data including a review of the published literature led to the proposed structures of the MS/MS product ions of 24 compounds covering two classes of regulated veterinary drugs (anthelmintics and thyreostats). In addition, the use of MS(2) and MS(3) experiments led to the establishment of fragmentation patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The identification and quantification of veterinary drug residues is helpful information for regulatory monitoring programs in defense of regulatory enforcement actions. Published in 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/analysis , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Anthelmintics/chemistry , Ions/analysis , Ions/chemistry , Veterinary Drugs/chemistry
13.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 407(15): 4423-35, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25542573

ABSTRACT

Multiclass, multiresidue methods are becoming increasingly popular in regulatory monitoring programs due to their increased analytical scope and laboratory efficiency. In this work, we report the development and validation of a new high-throughput analytical method to monitor up to 131 veterinary drug residues, representing at least 13 different classes, in bovine muscle. This novel method streamlined sample preparation to <15 min/sample/analyst, or a batch of 40-60 pre-homogenized samples in <3 h/analyst, through the combination of dispersive solid-phase extraction with in-vial filtration (a new technique known as filter-vial d-SPE). The use of an enhanced sensitivity state-of-the-art tandem mass spectrometer led to <10 ng/g limits of quantification for nearly all drug analytes with injection of 0.17 mg of equivalent sample. Positive and negative switching in electrospray ionization was applied to cover all analytes in an 11-min liquid chromatographic separation. In the 3-day validation study, 100 of the drugs met quantification criteria of 70-120% recoveries and Horwitz Ratio ≤1.0, and the remaining analytes could still be screened at regulatory target levels. In the validation study involving >11,400 analyte results for spiked samples, the rate of false negatives for identification purposes was <5%, and no false positives occurred at appreciable concentrations.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues/analysis , Meat/analysis , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Filtration/methods , Limit of Detection , Muscles/chemistry , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods
14.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 28(10): 1061-81, 2014 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711270

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Monitoring of veterinary drug residues in foods is often conducted using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Results have high economic stakes for producers, but the ions monitored are usually selected due to signal intensities without structural interpretation. In this study, the ion transitions were characterized by high-resolution mass spectrometry. METHODS: The 62 veterinary drugs from the LC/MS/MS method consisted of sulfonamides, ß-lactams, phenicols, macrolides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroids. They were individually infused into a quadrupole time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization (ESI) operated in positive mode. The MS and collision-induced dissociation (CID) MS/MS spectra for each analyte were obtained for structural elucidation. The Q-TOF instrument was calibrated to obtain a mass accuracy error <5 ppm for the MS and MS/MS spectra. RESULTS: The use of high-resolution ESI-Q-TOF-MS for the generation of the MS/MS product ions allowed for the determination of chemical formulae for the analytes, some of which led to new findings. Assigned structures were based on rational interpretation of the most stable possible products with comparison with the scientific literature. In difficult cases, isotopically labeled drugs or hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange experiments were used to help confirm the structures of the product ions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ESI-Q-TOF-MS in this study has allowed structure elucidation of 186 MS/MS product ions previously selected for the LC/MS/MS analysis of 62 veterinary drugs. This serves to reduce the chances of false positives and negatives in the monitoring program, and provides justification and defense in regulatory enforcement actions.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues/chemistry , Food Analysis/methods , Ions/chemistry , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods , Veterinary Drugs/chemistry , Drug Residues/analysis , Ions/analysis , Models, Molecular , Veterinary Drugs/analysis
15.
J Chromatogr A ; 1313: 103-12, 2013 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24075075

ABSTRACT

A high-throughput qualitative screening and identification method for 9 aminoglycosides of regulatory interest has been developed, validated, and implemented for bovine kidney, liver, and muscle tissues. The method involves extraction at previously validated conditions, cleanup using disposable pipette extraction, and analysis by a 3 min ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method. The drug analytes include neomycin, streptomycin, dihydrosptreptomycin, and spectinomycin, which have residue tolerances in bovine in the US, and kanamicin, gentamicin, apramycin, amikacin, and hygromycin, which do not have US tolerances established in bovine tissues. Tobramycin was used as an internal standard. An additional drug, paromomycin also was validated in the method, but it was dropped during implementation due to conversion of neomycin into paromomycin. Proposed fragmentation patterns for the monitored ions of each analyte were elucidated with the aid of high resolution MS using a quadrupole-time-of-flight instrument. Recoveries from spiking experiments at regulatory levels of concern showed that all analytes averaged 70-120% recoveries in all tissues, except hygromycin averaged 61% recovery. Lowest calibrated levels were as low as 0.005 µg/g in matrix extracts, which approximately corresponded to the limit of detection for screening purposes. Drug identifications at levels <0.05 µg/g were made in spiked and/or real samples for all analytes and tissues tested. Analyses of 60 samples from 20 slaughtered cattle previously screened positive for aminoglycosides showed that this method worked well in practice. The UHPLC-MS/MS method has several advantages compared to the previous microbial inhibition screening assay, especially for distinguishing individual drugs from a mixture and improving identification of gentamicin in tissue samples.


Subject(s)
Aminoglycosides/analysis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Drug Residues/analysis , Meat/analysis , Aminoglycosides/chemistry , Aminoglycosides/isolation & purification , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/isolation & purification , Cattle , Drug Residues/chemistry , Drug Residues/isolation & purification , Drug Stability , Limit of Detection , Reproducibility of Results , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Tissue Distribution
16.
J Chromatogr A ; 1258: 43-54, 2012 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22944383

ABSTRACT

In this study, optimization, extension, and validation of a streamlined, qualitative and quantitative multiclass, multiresidue method was conducted to monitor >100 veterinary drug residues in meat using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Optimization centered on extensive ruggedness evaluation of the method. Various clean-up sorbents were tested and the amount of co-extractives were weighed, matrix effects were measured using post-column infusion of representative analytes, the effect of extract dilution before injecting was studied, and analyte recoveries and reproducibilities were determined. In order to extend our previous method, more drug analytes were added that possessed a wider range of chemical properties, and a re-appraisal of different types of C18 in dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up and mobile phases in UHPLC-MS/MS was done. Ultimately, end-capped C18 and post-column infusion of ammonium formate as an ionization enhancer for the late-eluting anthelmintics were found to give improved qualitative results for greater analytical scope. A multi-day, multi-analyst validation demonstrated that the final method is suitable for screening of 113 analytes, identifying 98 and quantifying (recoveries between 70-120% and RSD<25%) 87 out of the 127 tested drugs at or below US regulatory tolerance levels in bovine muscle.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Drug Residues/analysis , Meat/analysis , Muscles/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Anthelmintics/analysis , Anthelmintics/isolation & purification , Cattle , Drug Residues/isolation & purification , Reproducibility of Results , Solid Phase Extraction , Veterinary Drugs/isolation & purification
17.
Drug Test Anal ; 4 Suppl 1: 75-90, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22851364

ABSTRACT

In the USA, the US Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) conducts the National Residue Program designed to monitor veterinary drug and other chemical residues in beef and other slaughtered food animals. Currently, FSIS uses a 7-plate bioassay in the laboratory to screen for antimicrobial drugs in bovine kidneys from those animals tested positive by inspectors in the slaughter establishments. The microbial inhibition bioassay has several limitations in terms of monitoring scope, sensitivity, selectivity, and analysis time. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) has many advantages over the bioassay for this application, and this study was designed to develop, evaluate, and validate a fast UHPLC-MS/MS method for antibiotics and other high-priority veterinary drugs in bovine kidney. Five existing multi-class, multi-residue methods from the literature were tested and compared, and each performed similarly. Experiments with incurred samples demonstrated that a 5-min shake of 2 g homogenized kidney with 10 ml of 4/1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water followed by simultaneous clean-up of the initial extract with 0.5 g C18 and 10 ml hexane gave a fast, simple, and effective sample preparation method for the <10 min UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. An extensive 5-day validation process demonstrated that the final method could be used to acceptably screen for 54 of the 62 drugs tested, and 50 of those met qualitative MS identification criteria. Quantification was not needed in the application, but the method gave ≥ 70% recoveries and ≤ 25% reproducibilities for 30 of the drugs.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues/analysis , Kidney/chemistry , Meat/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Food Contamination/analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity
18.
Drug Test Anal ; 4 Suppl 1: 91-102, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22851365

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, regulatory monitoring of veterinary drug residues in food animal tissues involves the use of several single-class methods to cover a wide analytical scope. Multi-class, multi-residue methods (MMMs) of analysis tend to provide greater overall laboratory efficiency than the use of multiple methods, and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of targeted drug analytes usually provides exceptional performance even for complicated sample extracts. In this work, an LC-MS/MS method was optimized and validated in a test of 120 drug analytes from 11 different classes in bovine kidney. The method used 10 ml of 4/1 acetonitrile/water for extraction of 2 g samples and cleanup with hexane partitioning. Quantitative and qualitative performance was assessed for the analytes at fortification levels of 10, 50, 100, and 200 ng/g. With the method, 66 drugs gave 70-120% recovery with ≤ 20% RSD at all levels over the course of 3 days. At the 200 ng/g level, 89 drugs met these same standards. Limits of detection were ≤ 10 ng/g for 109 of the analytes in the kidney matrix in validation experiments. Qualitatively, MS/MS identification criteria were set that ion ratios occur within ± 10% (absolute value) from those of the analyte reference standards. At the 10 ng/g level, 57% of the drugs met the identification criteria, which improved to 84% at the 200 ng/g level. The method serves as an efficient and useful additional option among the current monitoring methods available.


Subject(s)
Drug Residues/analysis , Kidney/chemistry , Meat/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Veterinary Drugs/analysis , Acetonitriles , Animals , Cattle , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Drug Residues/isolation & purification , Limit of Detection , Veterinary Drugs/isolation & purification
19.
J AOAC Int ; 93(2): 355-67, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20480880

ABSTRACT

Three different calibration approaches were applied in HPLC/MS/MS using electrospray ionization for the determination of 14 diverse pesticide residues at different levels in a variety of food matrixes. This study was conducted as part of a 4 day training course for 17 chemists to learn the "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe" (QuEChERS) approach to pesticide residue analysis in foods. The analysts were divided into four different teams for the analysis of 12 different matrixes (strawberries, plums, carrots, green peppers, milk, molasses, alfalfa oats, corn silage, dry pet food, soybean, almonds, and foliage). The acetate-buffered QuEChERS protocol gave excellent results in the spiked samples for all matrixes tested. The HPLC/MS/MS calibration techniques consisted of external standardization in solvent solutions, matrix-matching, and the echo-peak technique. Peak areas were normalized to an internal standard in all three approaches. Matrix effects were observed with the corn silage, carrot, and foliage extracts, but they were minimal or nonexistent in the other matrixes. Matrix-matching best compensated for matrix effects, but has logistical difficulties in real-world application and required extra sample preparation compared to the other approaches. The echo-peak technique reduced matrix effects but did not eliminate them.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Calibration , Food Analysis , Food Contamination , Fruit , Ions , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Solvents/chemistry , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization , Time Factors , Vegetables
20.
Anal Chim Acta ; 637(1-2): 196-207, 2009 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19286030

ABSTRACT

A liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) multi-residue method for the simultaneous quantification and identification of 38 residues of the most widely used anthelmintic veterinary drugs (including benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, and flukicides) in milk and liver has been developed and validated. For sample preparation, we used a simple modification of the QuEChERS method, which was initially developed for pesticide residue analysis. The method involved extracting sample (10 g) with acetonitrile (10 mL), followed by phase separation from water (salting out) with MgSO(4):NaCl (4:1, w/w). After centrifugation, an aliquot of the extract (1 mL) was purified by dispersive solid-phase extraction with MgSO(4) (150 mg) and C(18) (50mg), prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. Two injections of the same extract were required with the LC-MS/MS instrument to cover the 30 electrospray positive and 8 electrospray negative analytes. The limit of quantitation of the method was 5 microgkg(-1) for 37 analytes (and 10 microgkg(-1) for dichlorvos). The method was successfully validated according to the 2002/657/EC guidelines. Recovery of analytes was typically in the 70-120% range, with repeatabilities and reproducibilities typically <15% in milk and <20% in liver.


Subject(s)
Anthelmintics/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Liver/chemistry , Milk/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Anthelmintics/isolation & purification , Cattle , Pesticide Residues/analysis , Pesticide Residues/isolation & purification , Pesticides/analysis , Pesticides/isolation & purification , Reproducibility of Results , Solid Phase Extraction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...