Thorough QT study of the effects of vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, on cardiac repolarization and conduction in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the effects of vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor for treating type 2 diabetes, on cardiac repolarization and conduction. METHODS: Healthy volunteers (n = 101) were randomized (1:1:1:1 ratio) to vildagliptin 100 or 400 mg, moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control), or placebo once daily for 5 days. Electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline and day 5 for 24 hours post-dose. Placebo-adjusted mean change from baseline in QT interval, heart-rate-corrected QT intervals by Fridericia's (QTcF) or Bazett's (QTcB) formula, and PR and QRS intervals were compared at each time-point (time-matched analysis) and for values averaged across the dosing period (time-averaged analysis). RESULTS: For time-matched analysis, mean changes in QTcF with vildagliptin were below predefined limits for QTc prolongation (mean increase <5 ms; upper 90% confidence interval [CI] < 10 ms), except for vildagliptin 100 mg at 1 and 8 hours post-dose (upper 90% CI > 10 ms). With moxifloxacin, significant QTcF prolongation occurred at most time-points, demonstrating assay sensitivity. No vildagliptin- or placebo-treated volunteer had QTcF > 450 ms. Incidences of QTcF increases ≥30 ms with vildagliptin (100 and 400 mg) and placebo were similar (4-8%) and were much lower than with moxifloxacin (39%). No QTcF increase ≥60 ms was observed with vildagliptin or placebo (versus one with moxifloxacin). Time-averaged, time-matched, and categorical analyses of QT/QTcF/QTcB showed similar results. Drug exposure analysis showed no correlation between vildagliptin plasma levels and QTc changes. Vildagliptin had no effect on PR or QRS intervals. Although this study, completed before publication of current ICH E14 guidelines, was underpowered for time-matched analysis, the results are consistent with lack of effect of vildagliptin on QTc. CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin did not prolong QT interval or affect cardiac conduction at the highest daily therapeutic dose or a fourfold higher dose.

Assessing the cardio-cerebrovascular safety of vildagliptin: meta-analysis of adjudicated events from a large Phase III type 2 diabetes population.

AIM: To assess the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (CCV) safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor vildagliptin. METHODS: Data were pooled from 25 Phase III studies of vildagliptin, used either as monotherapy or combination therapy, with durations of 12 weeks to > or = 2 years. The safety of vildagliptin [50 mg qd (N = 1393) or 50 mg bid (N = 6116)] was assessed relative to a pool of all comparators [both placebo and active comparators (N = 6061)]. CCV events were adjudicated in a prospective, blinded fashion by an independent CCV adjudication committee. Meta-analysis of confirmed CCV events was performed with Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios (RRs); categories included in the composite endpoint were acute coronary syndrome, transient ischaemic attack (with imaging evidence of infarction), stroke and CCV death. Subgroup analyses by age (< and > or = 65 years), gender and cardiovascular (CV) risk status [high CV risk status defined as a previous history of events in the Standard MedDRA Queries of ischaemic heart disease, cardiac failure, ischaemic cerebrovascular conditions and/or embolic/thrombotic events, arterial) were also carried out. In addition, unadjusted and exposure-adjusted incidences are presented for both the composite endpoint and its components. RESULTS: Relative to all comparators, the RRs for the composite endpoint were < 1 for both vildagliptin 50 mg qd [RR = 0.88; 95% CI (0.37, 2.11)] and vildagliptin 50 mg bid [RR = 0.84; 95% CI (0.62, 1.14)]. The results were consistent across subgroups defined by age, gender and CV risk status, including the higher CV risk subgroups of elderly patients [RR for vildagliptin 50 mg bid vs. all comparators = 1.04; 95% CI (0.62, 1.73)], males [RR = 0.87; 95% CI (0.60, 1.24)] or patients with a high CV risk status [RR = 0.78; 95% CI (0.51, 1.19)]. The exposure-adjusted incidences of each component of the composite endpoint for vildagliptin 50 mg bid were also lower than or similar to those of all comparators. CONCLUSIONS: In a large meta-analysis, vildagliptin was not associated with an increased risk of adjudicated CCV events relative to all comparators in the broad population of type 2 diabetes including patients at increased risk of CCV events.

An assessment of adverse effects of vildagliptin versus comparators on the liver, the pancreas, the immune system, the skin and in patients with impaired renal function from a large pooled database of Phase II and III clinical trials.

AIM: To assess the safety of vildagliptin versus all comparators (ACs) with regard to organs, systems or tissues of particular interest in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and areas of potential concern with dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitors. METHODS: Data were pooled from 38 studies where vildagliptin was given for > or =12 to > 104 weeks in patients with T2DM. Absolute and exposure-adjusted incidence rates and Peto odds ratios (ORs) versus ACs with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: There were > 7000 subject-years of exposure (SYE) to vildagliptin 50 mg bid and > 6500 SYE to ACs. For mild hepatic enzyme elevations with and without elevated bilirubin levels, the ORs for vildagliptin 50 mg bid were 1.24 (95% CI: [0.80, 1.93]) and 1.19 (95% CI: [0.29, 4.90]), respectively. The exposure-adjusted incidences of markedly elevated hepatic enzymes and for enzyme elevations with bilirubin > or = 2x ULN with vildagliptin 50 mg bid were < or = those in the ACs group. For hepatic and pancreatitis-related AEs, the ORs for vildagliptin 50 mg bid were 0.87 (95% CI: [0.64, 1.19]) and 0.70 (95% CI: [0.26, 1.88]), respectively, and for any AE in the infections and infestations SOC, this was 1.04 (95% CI: [0.96, 1.13]). The incidences of skin-related AEs were low and the risk with vildagliptin 50 mg bid was not significantly different from ACs [(OR = 1.10 (95% CI: [0.80, 1.51])]. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analyses indicate that vildagliptin was not associated with increased risk of hepatic events or hepatic enzyme elevations indicative of drug-induced liver injury, pancreatitis, infections or skin-related toxicity.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction between the dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor vildagliptin, glyburide and pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Vildagliptin is a selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) that improves glycemic control and pancreatic b-cell function in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Vildagliptin may be an appropriate agent to combine with other antihyperglycemic agents in patients requiring combination therapy to achieve optimal glycemic control. Two studies were performed to determine the potential for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between vildagliptin and the sulfonylurea, glyburide, or pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Two open-label, multiple-dose, 3-period, randomized, crossover studies in patients with Type 2 diabetes were carried out. Steady state drug pharmacokinetics and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin responses were assessed during treatment with vildagliptin 100 mg b.i.d. alone and in combination with glyburide 10 mg q.d. (n = 17) or with vildagliptin 100 mg q.d. alone or in combination with pioglitazone 45 mg q.d. (n = 15). RESULTS: Coadministration of vildagliptin with either glyburide or pioglitazone had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of any of the 3 drugs. Changes in AUC and Cmax during combination treatment were small ( pound 15%), and 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (drug coadministration/monotherapy) were generally contained within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.80 - 1.25). Vildagliptin/glyburide coadministration significantly reduced the area under the plasma glucose-time curve compared with glyburide alone (AUE0-5h reduced by 12% (p = 0.005) and AUE0-15h by 13% (p = 0.003)), and increased the area under the plasma insulin-time curve (AUE0-15h increased by 12% (p = 0.041)). Vildagliptin/pioglitazone coadministration also significantly reduced postprandial glucose exposure compared with pioglitazone alone (AUE0.5-5.5h reduced by 11% (p = 0.029) and AUE0-15.5h by 10% (p = 0.019)). Vildagliptin was generally well tolerated whether administered alone or in combination with glyburide or pioglitazone, and was not associated with hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of vildagliptin with either glyburide or pioglitazone in patients with Type 2 diabetes improves postprandial glycemic control without notable effects on drug pharmacokinetics.

Bioequivalence of vildagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets and a free combination of vildagliptin and metformin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of vildagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination tablets (at doses of 50/500, 50/850 and 50/1,000 mg) with free combination of the individual drugs in healthy subjects. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin and metformin following administration of a fixed-dose combination tablet of vildagliptin/metformin at doses of 50/500 mg (Study I), 50/850 mg (Study II) and 50/1,000 mg (Study III) compared with administration of the individual drugs as free combinations were investigated. All three studies were open-label, single-center, randomized, two-period, two-treatment crossover studies in healthy subjects. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC(0-infinity), C(max), t(max), t(1/2) and CL/F) for vildagliptin and metformin across the three studies were similar whether vildagliptin and metformin were administered as a single fixed-dose combination tablet (vildagliptin/metformin 50/500, 50/850 or 50/1,000 mg) or as the respective individual tablets. The point estimates and 90% CI of the geometric mean ratios for vildagliptin and metformin C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were all within the predefined bioequivalence range of 0.80 - 1.25. Administration of the vildagliptin/metformin combination tablets was well tolerated; the incidence of adverse events was similar to that observed with the respective free combinations of vildagliptin and metformin, and the most common individual adverse events were mild gastrointestinal events, which are commonly observed with metformin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-dose combination tablet of vildagliptin/metformin is bioequivalent to administration of the individual drugs as a free combination at dose levels of 50/500, 50/850 and 50/1,000 mg and is well tolerated. Consequently, the fixed-dose combination tablets are considered therapeutically equivalent and exchangeable to the free combination in clinical practice. Furthermore, the fixed-dose combination tablets are expected to enhance convenience and thereby improve compliance and improve glycemic control for patients with Type 2 diabetes on both medications.

The influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin.

OBJECTIVE: Vildagliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor that improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by increasing alpha- and beta-cell responsiveness to glucose. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin in patients with hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label, parallel-group study in patients with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 4) hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (n = 6). All subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin, and plasma concentrations of vildagliptin and its main pharmacologically inactive metabolite LAY151 were measured up to 36 h post-dose. RESULTS: Exposure to vildagliptin (AUC(0-infinity) and C(max)) decreased non-significantly by 20 and 30%, respectively, in patients with mild hepatic impairment [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): AUC(0-infinity), 0.80 (0.60, 1.06), p = 0.192; C(max), 0.70 (0.46, 1.05), p = 0.149]. Exposure to vildagliptin was also decreased non-significantly in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [-8% for AUC(0-infinity), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.92 (0.69, 1.23), p = 0.630; -23% for C(max), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.77 (0.51, 1.17), p = 0.293]. In patients with severe hepatic impairment, C(max) was 6% lower than that in healthy subjects [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.94 (0.59, 1.49), p = 0.285], whereas AUC(0-infinity) was increased by 22% [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 1.22 (0.89, 1.68), p = 0.816). Across the hepatic impairment groups, LAY151 AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were increased by 29-84% and 24-63%, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. The single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin was well tolerated by patients with hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in exposure to vildagliptin in patients with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment; therefore, no dose adjustment of vildagliptin is necessary in patients with hepatic impairment.

Vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor, improves model-assessed beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor, vildagliptin, increases levels of intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although GLP-1 is known to stimulate insulin secretion, vildagliptin does not affect plasma insulin levels in diabetic patients, suggesting that more sophisticated measures are necessary to ascertain the influence of vildagliptin on beta-cell function. METHODS: This study examined the effects of 28-d treatment with vildagliptin (100 mg, twice daily; n = 9) vs. placebo (n = 11) on beta-cell function in diabetic patients using a mathematical model that describes the insulin secretory rate as a function of glucose levels (beta-cell dose response), the change in glucose with time (derivative component), and a potentiation factor, which is a function of time and may reflect the actions of nonglucose secretagogues and other factors. RESULTS: Vildagliptin significantly increased the insulin secretory rate at 7 mmol/liter glucose (secretory tone), calculated from the dose response; the difference in least squares mean (deltaLSM) was 101 +/- 51 pmol.min(-1).m(-2) (P = 0.002). The slope of the beta-cell dose response, the derivative component, and the potentiation factor were not affected. Vildagliptin also significantly decreased mean prandial glucose (deltaLSM, -1.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/liter; P = 0.01) and glucagon (deltaLSM, -10.7 +/- 4.8 ng/liter; P = 0.03) levels and increased plasma levels of intact GLP-1 (deltaLSM, +10.8 +/- 1.6 pmol/liter; P < 0.0001) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (deltaLSM, +43.4 +/- 9.4 pmol/liter; P < 0.0001) relative to placebo. CONCLUSION: Vildagliptin is an incretin degradation inhibitor that improves beta-cell function in diabetic patients by increasing the insulin secretory tone.

Importance of early phase insulin secretion to intravenous glucose tolerance in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insulin secretion is impaired in type 2 diabetes with the early response being essentially absent. The loss of this early insulin secretion is hypothesized to be important in the deterioration of glucose tolerance. To determine whether enhancement of the early-phase insulin response can enhance glucose tolerance, we administered 1) 120 mg nateglinide, an insulinotropic agent that enhances early insulin secretion; 2) 10 mg glyburide, which enhances the later phases of insulin secretion; or 3) placebo in random order to 21 subjects with type 2 diabetes (14 males and 7 females; aged 59.2 +/- 2.1 yr, x +/- SEM; body mass index 29.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m(2); fasting plasma glucose 8.1 +/- 0.1 mM). beta-Cell function was quantified as the incremental area under the curve for different time periods for the 5 h following iv glucose administration and glucose tolerance as the glucose disappearance constant (Kg) from 10 to 60 min. Insulin release commenced immediately after nateglinide administration, even before glucose injection, but this was not observed with glyburide. Both nateglinide and glyburide enhanced glucose-induced insulin release, compared with placebo (area under the curve -15-300 min: nateglinide 23,595 +/- 11,212 pM/min, glyburide 54,556 +/- 15,253 pM/min, placebo 10,242 +/- 2,414 pM/min). The profiles of insulin release demonstrated significant enhancement of release between -15 and 30 min for nateglinide, compared with glyburide and between 60 and 300 min for glyburide over nateglinide. Kg increased by 15% with nateglinide (0.87 +/- 0.04%/min), but it did not increase significantly with glyburide (0.79 +/- 0.04%/min), compared with placebo (0.76 +/- 0.04%/min). The enhancement of insulin release by glyburide resulted in a lower minimal glucose concentration with glyburide (3.8 +/- 0.2 mM), compared with nateglinide (5.0 +/- 0.2 mM) and placebo (5.9 +/- 0.2 mM). Thus, enhancement of the early phase of insulin secretion improves iv glucose tolerance, whereas delaying it by 30 min results in a slower rate of glucose disappearance for the first 2 h after iv glucose administration. Further, the differences in the kinetics of nateglinide and glyburide action results in continued insulin release with glyburide despite the fact that glucose levels have returned to basal, thus resulting in a further reduction in glucose levels and a lower nadir.