Abdominal aortic aneurysm causing duodenal obstruction: two case reports and review of the literature.

Obstruction of the upper gastrointestinal tract caused by an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aortoduodenal syndrome) has been rarely reported. The typical presentation includes protracted emesis in a patient with a pulsatile abdominal mass. Clinical features of weight loss, abdominal pain, and distention are present less frequently. The diagnosis is suggested by findings on computed tomography scans, and may be confirmed with upper gastrointestinal contrast material-enhanced studies or upper endoscopy. Aortic aneurysmorrhaphy is curative, and should be undertaken after gastrointestinal decompression and correction of fluid and electrolyte disturbances. We report 2 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm producing upper gastrointestinal obstruction, and provide a review of the literature relevant to this clinical syndrome.

Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia: surgical management and outcomes.

Acute mesenteric ischemia secondary to arterial occlusion (AMI) remains a highly lethal condition. To examine recent trends in management and associated outcomes, we examined our institutional experience over a recent 10-year period. All patients treated for AMI between January 1990 and January 2000 were identified (76 patients, 77 cases) and their medical records examined. At presentation, 64% demonstrated peritonitis and 30% exhibited hypotension. The interval from symptom onset to treatment exceeded 24 h in 63% of cases. Etiology was mesenteric thrombosis in 44 patients (58%) and embolism in 32 patients (42%). Thirty-five patients (46%) had prior conditions placing them at high risk for the development of AMI including chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 26) and inadequately anticoagulated chronic atrial fibrillation (n = 9). Surgical management consisted of exploration alone in 16 patients, bowel resection alone in 18 patients, and revascularization in 43 patients, including 28 who required concomitant bowel resection. Overall, intestinal necrosis was present in 81% of cases. Perioperative mortality was 62% and long-term parenteral nutrition (TPN) was required in 31% of survivors. Peritonitis (odds ratio [OR] 9.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 54.0; p = 0.012 and bowel necrosis (OR 10.4, CI 1.9, 56.3; p = 0.007) at presentation were independent predictors of death or survival dependent upon TPN. We conclude that AMI remains a highly lethal condition due in large part to advanced presentation and inadequate recognition and treatment of patients at high risk.

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.

Surgical management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: This review describes the clinical outcome of surgical intervention for atherosclerotic renovascular disease in 500 consecutive patients with hypertension. METHODS: From January 1987 to December 1999, 626 patients underwent operative renal artery (RA) repair at our center. A subgroup of 500 patients (254 women and 246 men; mean age, 65 plus minus 9 years) with hypertension (mean blood pressure, 200 plus minus 35/104 plus minus 21 mm Hg) and atherosclerotic RA disease forms the basis of this report. Hypertension response was determined from preoperative and postoperative blood pressure measurements and medication requirements. Change in renal function was determined with estimated glomerular filtration rates (EGFRs) calculated from serum creatinine levels. Proportional hazards regression models were used for the examination of associations between selected preoperative parameters, blood pressure and renal function response, and eventual dialysis-dependence or death. RESULTS: Two hundred three patients underwent unilateral RA procedures, 297 underwent bilateral RA procedures, and 205 patients underwent combined renal and aortic reconstruction. After surgery, there were 23 deaths (4.6%) in the hospital or within 30 days of surgery. Significant and independent predictors of perioperative death included advanced age (P <.0001; hazard ratio [HR], 3.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85 to 5.70) and clinical congestive heart failure (P =.013; HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.26 to 7.34). Among the patients who survived surgery, hypertension was considered cured in 12%, improved in 73%, and unchanged in 15%. For the entire group, renal function increased significantly after operation (preoperative versus postoperative mean EGFR, 41.1 plus minus 23.9 versus 48.2 plus minus 25.5 mL/min/m(2); P <.0001). For individual patients, with a 20% or more change in EGFR considered significant, 43% had improved renal function (including 28 patients who were removed from dialysis-dependence), 47% had unchanged function, and 10% had worsened function. Preoperative renal insufficiency (P <.001; HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.98), diabetes mellitus (P =.007; HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.97), prior stroke (P =.042; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.22), and severe aortic occlusive disease (P =.003; HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19 to 2.31) showed significant and independent associations with death or dialysis during the follow-up examination period. After operation, blood pressure cured (P =.014; HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.88) and improved renal function (P =.011; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.81) showed significant and independent associations with improved dialysis-free survival rate. All categories of function response and time to death or dialysis showed significant interactions with preoperative EGFR. CONCLUSION: The surgical correction of atherosclerotic renovascular disease resulted in blood pressure benefit and retrieval of renal function in selected patients with hypertension. The patients with cured hypertension or improved EGFR after operation showed increased dialysis-free survival as compared with other patients who underwent surgery.

Survival of young patients after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the cardiovascular disease, perioperative results, and survival after surgical abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in young patients (< or = 50 years) compared with randomly selected older patients who also underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We reviewed hospital records to identify young and randomly selected control patients (3 for each young patient, > or = 65 years, matched for year of operation) with degenerative (atherosclerotic) abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing repair between Jan 1, 1988, and Mar 31, 2000. Patients with congenital aneurysms, pseudoaneurysms, aortic dissections, post-coarctation dilations, aortic infection, arteritis, or aneurysms isolated to the thoracic aorta were excluded. Mortality data and cause of death were obtained from medical records and the National Death Index RESULTS: Among 1168 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, 19 young patients (1.6%) and 57 control patients were identified. The mean age was 48.4 years in the young group and 72.2 years in the control group. There were no differences in sex or race between the two groups. When comparing existing cardiovascular disease between the groups, there were no differences in the incidence of earlier coronary revascularization (26% vs 16%) or non-cardiac vascular surgery (5% vs 9%), but aneurysms were more commonly symptomatic in young patients (53% vs 21%; P <.01). Aneurysmal disease was limited to the infrarenal aorta in similar proportions of patients (89% vs 88%). No statistically significant differences were seen in the incidence of perioperative deaths (16% young vs 9% control; P =.40) or postoperative complications (37% young vs 26% control; P =.38). The estimated survival rate of the young group was not different from that of the control group (3-year survival rate, 73% vs 69%; P =.32) or the entire cohort of patients (older than 50 years; n = 1101) who underwent repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms during the study period (3-year survival 73% vs 75%; P =.63) CONCLUSION: After abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, young patients had perioperative results and follow-up mortality rates similar to those of control patients. Cardiovascular disease was the predominant cause of death after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the young patients. When compared with an age older than 50 years at the time of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, young age alone was not associated with increased survival.