ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVETo investigate maternal immunoglobulins (IgM, IgG) response to SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and IgG transplacental transfer, to characterize neonatal antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to longitudinally follow actively- and passively-acquired SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in infants. DESIGNA prospective observational study. SETTINGA public healthcare system in Santa Clara County (CA, USA). PARTICIPANTSWomen with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and their infants were enrolled between April 15, 2020 and March 31, 2021. OUTCOMESSARS-CoV-2 serology analyses in the cord and maternal blood at delivery and longitudinally in infant blood between birth and 28 weeks of life. RESULTSOf 145 mothers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy, 86 had symptomatic infections: 78 with mild-moderate symptoms, and eight with severe-critical symptoms. Of the 147 newborns, two infants showed seroconversion at two weeks of age with high levels of IgM and IgG, including one premature infant with confirmed intrapartum infection. The seropositivity rates of the mothers at delivery was 65% (95% CI 0.56-0.73) and the cord blood was 58% (95% CI 0.49-0.66). IgG levels significantly correlated between the maternal and cord blood (Rs= 0.93, p< 0.0001). IgG transplacental transfer ratio was significantly higher when the first maternal positive PCR was 60-180 days before delivery compared to <60 days (1.2 vs. 0.6, p=<0.0001). Infant IgG negative conversion rate over follow-up periods of 1-4, 5-12, and 13-28 weeks were 8% (4/48), 12% (3/25), and 38% (5/13), respectively. The IgG seropositivity in the infants was positively related to IgG levels in the cord blood and persisted up to six months of age. CONCLUSIONSMaternal SARS-CoV-2 IgG is efficiently transferred across the placenta when infections occur more than two months before delivery. Maternally-derived passive immunity may protect infants up to six months of life. Neonates mount a strong antibody response to perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundSerological tests are crucial tools for assessments of SARS-CoV-2 exposure, infection and potential immunity. Their appropriate use and interpretation require accurate assay performance data. MethodWe conducted an evaluation of 10 lateral flow assays (LFAs) and two ELISAs to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The specimen set comprised 128 plasma or serum samples from 79 symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive individuals; 108 pre-COVID-19 negative controls; and 52 recent samples from individuals who underwent respiratory viral testing but were not diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Samples were blinded and LFA results were interpreted by two independent readers, using a standardized intensity scoring system. ResultsAmong specimens from SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive individuals, the percent seropositive increased with time interval, peaking at 81.8-100.0% in samples taken >20 days after symptom onset. Test specificity ranged from 84.3-100.0% in pre-COVID-19 specimens. Specificity was higher when weak LFA bands were considered negative, but this decreased sensitivity. IgM detection was more variable than IgG, and detection was highest when IgM and IgG results were combined. Agreement between ELISAs and LFAs ranged from 75.7-94.8%. No consistent cross-reactivity was observed. ConclusionOur evaluation showed heterogeneous assay performance. Reader training is key to reliable LFA performance, and can be tailored for survey goals. Informed use of serology will require evaluations covering the full spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 infections, from asymptomatic and mild infection to severe disease, and later convalescence. Well-designed studies to elucidate the mechanisms and serological correlates of protective immunity will be crucial to guide rational clinical and public health policies.
