New American Thyroid Association Sonographic Patterns for Thyroid Nodules Perform Well in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: Institutional Experience, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid nodule guidelines recommend selecting nodules for biopsy based on a sonographic pattern classification. These patterns were developed based on features of differentiated thyroid cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and the inter-observer agreement of this classification system in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). METHODS: The medical records of all patients with MTC evaluated at the authors' institution between 1998 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with presurgical thyroid ultrasound available for review were included in the study. Five independent reviewers assessed the stored ultrasound images for composition, echogenicity, margins, presence of calcifications, and extrathyroidal extension for each nodule. The presence of suspicious lymph nodes was also evaluated when presurgical lateral neck ultrasound was available for review. Each nodule was classified according to the ATA sonographic patterns. Inter-observer agreement was calculated for each sonographic feature and for the sonographic patterns. To validate the findings, a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the sonographic features of MTC was conducted. RESULTS: In this institutional cohort, the inter-observer agreement for individual sonographic features was moderate to good (κ = 0.45-0.71), and for the ATA classification it was good (κ = 0.72). Ninety-seven percent (29/30) of the MTCs were classified in the intermediate or high suspicion patterns. A total of 249 MTCs were included in the meta-analysis. Based on pooled frequencies for solid composition and hypoechogenicity, >95% of MTCs would be classified at least in the intermediate suspicion pattern, warranting the lowest-size threshold for biopsy (≥1 cm). CONCLUSIONS: The sonographic patterns proposed by the ATA perform well in MTC, and inter-observer agreement is good to very good.

Temozolomide for aggressive ACTH pituitary tumors: failure of a second course of treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that has been used over the past 8 years to treat aggressive pituitary tumors resistant to conventional therapy. To date, only 25 patients treated with TMZ for ACTH producing pituitary tumors (14 adenomas and 11 carcinomas) have been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present a retrospective review of the medical records of three patients with aggressive ACTH producing adenomas treated with TMZ. In the three cases there was evidence of progression to conventional therapy before starting TMZ. We used the conventional scheme for the treatment of gliomas until completing 7, 12 and 6 cycles respectively. Reduction in tumor size was evident after the 3rd, 5th and 4th cycle of TMZ and progression free survival was 25, 19 and more than 12 months in the three patients respectively. Improvement of the ocular and visual symptoms was evident after the 4th cycle of treatment in all cases. Normalization of urinary free cortisol levels was achieved after the 3rd and 9th cycle in the two cases with hypercortisolism. Two of the three patients received a second course of treatment when the disease progressed but it did not stop tumor progression. The principal side effects were G3 neutropenia, G1 and G2 thrombocytopenia, G1 lymphopenia, asthenia and nausea. CONCLUSION: The treatment with TMZ is effective and safe in patients with aggressive corticotrophin tumors resistant to conventional therapy. Nevertheless once the disease progresses, a second course of treatment does not seem to be effective.

New treatments and shifting paradigms in differentiated thyroid cancer management.

BACKGROUND: Although most thyroid cancer patients have an excellent prognosis, 10% of low-risk cancers and 25% of high-risk cancers recur, with mortality rates in excess of 50% at 3 years for aggressive thyroid cancer. Traditional paradigms including surgery, I¹³¹ ablation, and TSH suppression do not offer additional therapeutic options for cancers that fail these interventions. Risk stratification and outcomes data are shifting the treatment paradigms to favor more individualized therapies based on risk, and new treatment targets have been identified with promise to treat more aggressive thyroid cancer. METHODS: The authors review the recent literature and published guidelines on thyroid cancer and summarize changing management paradigms and treatments of thyroid cancer. RESULTS: Outcomes data and risk stratification have promoted changes to traditional paradigms. Total/near-total thyroidectomy improves outcomes in both recurrence and mortality. Central compartment lymph node dissection facilitates nodal status determination and likely improves outcomes, while low-risk patients with small tumors are not likely to benefit from I¹³¹ remnant ablation. Early-phase studies have demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival with multikinase inhibitors targeting MAPK and angiogenic pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification and outcomes data have modified treatment paradigms in thyroid cancer. Patients with progressive thyroid cancer that is no longer surgically resectable or iodine avid should be considered for treatment with multikinase inhibitors, preferably by enrollment in a therapeutic treatment trial.

Management of isolated Adrenal Lesions in Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal lesions are commonly identified in patients with extra-adrenal cancer. When lesions are present, it is important to identify if the lesion is a metastasis of the primary cancer or a primary adrenal neoplasm. If primary, the adrenal lesion must be evaluated for hypersecretion and its malignant potential determined for appropriate treatment planning. METHODS: Recent literature was reviewed that focused on the normal investigation of adrenal lesions including radiographic imaging and hormonal evaluations as well as specific focused therapeutic options available for isolated metastatic adrenal lesions. RESULTS: This review presents a pathway approach in investigating these lesions and also discusses various potential treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: A proper investigative workup of an adrenal lesion in a cancer patient is critical for proper management. Isolated adrenal metastatic lesions in the cancer patient should be surgically removed when possible, but other options can be considered. In patients who do not have metastasis from extra-adrenal cancer, the decision for surgical resection is dependent on functionality of the tumor and it's potential for malignancy. Observation plays a key role in those tumors that are nonfunctioning and have a low risk of malignancy.