Promoting Collaboration of Regulators and Patients in Improving Drug Safety and Regulatory Decision Making.

Pharmacovigilance involves a continuous process of evaluating, monitoring and communicating the safety profile of a medicine throughout its life cycle. This process involves a range of stakeholders, including national regulatory authorities, industry, health organisations, healthcare providers and patients. Although patients are the end users of medicines and experts in their medical conditions, patient involvement is still nascent in the Asia-Pacific region. While there are positive examples and encouraging trends, several key challenges currently hinder systemic patient involvement in drug safety and regulatory decision making. Systemic issues such as a lack of formalised frameworks or platforms, underdeveloped communication and information exchange channels, and paternalistic health systems constrain greater patient involvement and collaborative regulator-patient activities. Addressing these challenges will greatly advance collaboration among regulators, patients, and patient advocates to enhance drug safety and regulatory decision making.

Successes and Opportunities during the Pandemic: Reflections and Revelations from a Vaccine Development Perspective.

The Centre of Regulatory Excellence (CoRE) launched an annual lecture series in 2021 in Singapore to honor the memory of the late Professor Sir Alasdair Breckenridge, CoRE's founding Chair, and foster dialogue on global biomedical and regulatory perspectives, challenges, and advances. The 2022 Sir Alasdair Breckenridge Lecture "Success and Opportunities in the Pandemic" was delivered by Dr Penny M Heaton, former CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Research Institute and current Global Therapeutics Lead for Vaccines at Johnson & Johnson. Dr Heaton highlighted key lessons on the importance of trust, collaboration, and transparency in the context of health care and vaccine production.

The challenges and opportunities in using real-world data to drive advances in healthcare in East Asia: expert panel recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for overcoming the challenges associated with the generation and use of real-world evidence (RWE) in regulatory approvals, health technology assessments (HTAs), and reimbursement decision-making in East Asia. METHODS: A panel of experts convened at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Asia Pacific 2020 congress to discuss the challenges limiting the use of RWE in healthcare decision-making and to provide insights into the perspectives of regulators, HTA agencies, the pharmaceutical industry, and physicians in China, Japan, and Taiwan. A nonsystematic literature review was conducted to expand on the themes addressed. RESULTS: The use of RWE in regulatory approvals, HTAs, and reimbursement decision-making remains limited by legal/regulatory, technical, and attitudinal challenges in East Asia. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend approaches and initiatives that aim to drive improvements in the utilization of RWE in healthcare decision-making in East Asia and other regions. We encourage large-scale collaborations that leverage the full range of skills offered by different stakeholders. Government agencies, hospitals, research organizations, patient groups, and the pharmaceutical industry must collaborate to ensure appropriate access to robust and reliable real-world data and seek alignment on how to address prioritized evidence needs. Increasingly, we believe that this work will be conducted by multidisciplinary teams with expertise in healthcare research and delivery, data science, and information technology. We hope this work will encourage further discussion among all stakeholders seeking to shape the RWE landscape in East Asia and other regions and drive next-generation healthcare.

Measuring Progress of Regulatory Convergence and Cooperation Among Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Member Economies in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: Regulatory convergence and cooperation among medical product regulatory authorities are essential to delivering safe and efficacious products quickly to patients. The COVID-19 pandemic highlights the urgent need for streamlined regulatory approval processes-which can be achieved in part through regulatory convergence and cooperation-both to accelerate availability of COVID-19 vaccines, treatments and diagnostics and to maintain the availability of the existing medical products unrelated to COVID-19. METHODS: The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Life Sciences Innovation Forum (LSIF) established the Regulatory Harmonization Steering Committee (RHSC) in 2008 to advance regulatory convergence among APEC's 21 member economies. Key performance indicators (KPIs) were developed in 2018 to measure convergence. RESULTS: This paper reports survey results collected from KPI tracking in March 2020 from medical product regulatory authorities in all 21 APEC economies concerning areas of regulatory practice in which they could converge and cooperate. For example, from 2008 to 2020, there was a 14.3% increase in the number of APEC member economy regulatory authorities sharing Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Certificates and a 28% increase in the number of regulatory authorities accepting multisite licenses in that same period. In addition, this paper explores how APEC economies could realize a maximum level of regulatory convergence and cooperation. CONCLUSIONS: Convergence efforts within APEC can accelerate availability of medical products including that related to COVID-19 vaccines, treatments and diagnostics, while maintaining the availability of the existing medical products unrelated to COVID-19 vaccines and treatment. New KPIs and capability building are to be considered to enable a new era of innovation ushered in by COVID-19.

Improving access to quality medicines in East Africa: An independent perspective on the East African Community Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.

Alexander Giaquinto and co-authors discuss the East African Community's Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative.

Pandemic Best Regulatory Practices: An Urgent Need in the COVID-19 Pandemic.

As large numbers of candidate drugs and vaccines for potential use in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are being investigated, medicine regulators globally must now make urgent, informed, contextually risk-1based decisions regarding clinical trials and marketing authorizations. They must do this with the flexibility demanded by the pandemic while maintaining their core risk assessment and public safety functions. We lay out the critical role of regulators in the current crisis and offer eight "pandemic best regulatory practices." These should support both the regulatory public heath imperative and assure timely patient access to effective, safe, quality products worldwide during this emergency-thus contributing to ending this pandemic as quickly, effectively, and safely as possible.

Expanding global access to essential medicines: investment priorities for sustainably strengthening medical product regulatory systems.

Access to quality-assured medical products improves health and save lives. However, one third of the world's population lacks timely access to quality-assured medicines while estimates indicate that at least 10% of medicine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are substandard or falsified (SF), costing approximately US$ 31 billion annually. National regulatory authorities are the key government institutions that promote access to quality-assured medicines and combat SF medical products but despite progress, regulatory capacity in LMICs is still insufficient. Continued and increased investment in regulatory system strengthening (RSS) is needed. We have therefore reviewed existing global normative documents and resources and engaged with our networks of global partners and stakeholders to identify three critical challenges being faced by NRAs in LMICs that are limiting access to medical products and impeding detection of and response to SF medicines. The challenges are; implementing value-added regulatory practices that best utilize available resources, a lack of timely access to new, quality medical products, and limited evidence-based data to support post-marketing regulatory actions. To address these challenges, we have identified seven focused strategies; advancing and leveraging convergence and reliance initiatives, institutionalizing sustainability, utilizing risk-based approaches for resource allocation, strengthening registration efficiency and timeliness, strengthening inspection capacity and effectiveness, developing and implementing risk-based post-marketing quality surveillance systems, and strengthening regulatory management of manufacturing variations. These proposed solutions are underpinned by 13 focused recommendations, which we believe, if financed, technically supported and implemented, will lead to stronger health system and as a consequence, positive health outcomes.

Strengthening Health Products Regulatory Systems to Enhance Access to Quality Health Products in the Asia-Pacific.

Asia-Pacific is a region of fast growing opportunity for biomedical research and marketing of new health products by pharmaceutical and medical device companies. While national regulatory authorities have the responsibility to ensure timely access to innovative, effective, and safe therapies, many face capacity and resource constraints that limit their ability to guarantee a robust regulatory system capable of licensing and monitoring novel medicines and medical devices, and tackling substandard and falsified products. The region's regulatory landscape is also fragmented with country-specific requirements that create barriers to entry for new health products. To help address these challenges, the Duke-National University of Singapore's (Duke-NUS) Centre of Regulatory Excellence (CoRE) was established in 2014 with the strategic goals to strengthen the region's regulatory agencies through capacity development, regulatory convergence, work sharing, and nurturing networks for leadership and systems innovation. A smart and mature regulatory system in Asia-Pacific is pivotal to promote biomedical innovation and enhance equitable, sustainable access of populations to quality health products that are safe and efficacious.