ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date review to compare glue versus suture fixation in primary open Lichtenstein IHR. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer were systematically searched till June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR. Primary outcomes were early (at 1 year) and late recurrence (5 years or more). Secondary outcomes were the length of operation, postoperative haematoma and seroma, and chronic pain at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs with 3150 hernias (glue n = 1582, suture n = 1568) were included. Only three studies reported late recurrence. Glue fixation was associated with shorter operative duration (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 4.82, - 3.52; p < 0.001 and a lower incidence of haematoma formation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32, 0.81; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35, 1.49; p = 0.38), chronic pain after 1 year (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73, 1.65; p = 0.65), early recurrence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45, 2.76; p = 0.81, I2 = 0%), and late recurrence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.59, 2.59; p = 0.59, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Early and late recurrence were comparable between glue and suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR patients. Glue fixation had shorter operating time and lower haematoma formation than suture fixation. Chronic pain and seroma formation were comparable. More RCTs should report long-term outcomes.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Hernia, Inguinal , Chronic Pain/etiology , Chronic Pain/surgery , Hematoma/etiology , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Humans , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Recurrence , Seroma/etiology , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Sutures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare indocyanine green dye fluorescence cholangiography (ICG-FC) with intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) in minimal access cholecystectomy for visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree. BACKGROUND: Although studies have shown that ICG-FC is safe, feasible, and comparable to IOC to visualize the extrahepatic biliary tree, there is no comparative review. METHODS: We searched The Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to 8 April 2020 for all studies comparing ICG-FC with IOC in patients undergoing minimal access cholecystectomy. The primary outcomes were percentage visualization of the cystic duct (CD), common bile duct (CBD), CD-CBD junction, and the common hepatic duct (CHD). We used RevMan v5.3 software to analyze the data. RESULTS: Seven studies including 481 patients were included. Five studies, comprising 275 patients reported higher CD (RR = 0.90, p = 0.12, 95% CI 0.79-1.03, I2 = 74%) and CBD visualization rates (RR = 0.82, p = 0.09, 95% CI 0.65-1.03, I2 = 87%) by ICG-FC. Four studies, comprising 223 patients, reported higher CD-CBD junction visualization rates using ICG-FC compared to IOC (RR = 0.68, p = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.45-1.02, I2 = 94%). Four studies, comprising 210 patients, reported higher CHD visualization rates using ICG-FC compared to IOC (RR = 0.58, p = 0.03, 95% CI 0.35-0.93, I2 = 91%). CONCLUSION: ICG-FC is safe, and it improves visualization of CHD.
