Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic limited resections of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours of the uncinate process: Report of six cases and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for limited resections for pancreatic uncinate lesions is not widely performed but can adequately treat benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS-limited pancreatic resections for patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of six consecutive patients who underwent MIS for PNET within a single institution between 2017 and 2022. RESULTS: Six patients underwent limited pancreas-preserving MIS of the uncinate process (uncinectomy or enucleation), of which two were performed through the robotic approach and four through laparoscopic approach. The median operation time was 212.5 (175-338.75) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50-112.5) ml. The median post-operative hospital length of stay was 5.5 (3.75-11.5) days. Two patients (33.3%) had major post-operative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade 3). There were no open conversions or post-operative mortalities. Five patients had histologically proven Grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours. One was T2 and four were T1. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that limited MIS resections of pancreatic uncinate PNETs are a feasible procedure with good patient outcomes. It offers a safe alternative to radical surgical resections like pancreatoduodenectomies in selected patients with low-grade malignant or benign tumours.

Impact of COVID-19 telehealth on outpatient test completion.

BACKGROUND: Pathology and imaging tests are frequently requested in the outpatient setting despite historically poor completion rates. The impact of COVID-19 telehealth on test completion rates is unknown. AIMS: To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth transition on pathology and imaging test request and completion rates in Australian outpatient clinics. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study with historical controls between March-May 2019 and March-May 2020. Pathology and imaging request and completion rates were collected in review consultation patients attending gastroenterology and rheumatology outpatient clinics at a tertiary healthcare system prior and during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Melbourne. RESULTS: A total of 1376 patients was included in the study. Pathology tests were requested more frequently in the COVID-19 group (n = 582/684, 85.2%) than the control group (n = 492/692, 71.1%, P < 0.001), but completion rates were lower in the COVID-19 group (n = 443/582, 76.1%) than the control group (n = 426/492 (86.6%), P < 0.001). Imaging tests were requested more frequently in the COVID-19 group (n = 345/682, 50.6%) than the control group (n = 295/692, 42.6%, P = 0.003), with lower rates of completion in the COVID-19 group (n = 229/345, 66.4%) than the control group (n = 247/295, 83.7%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and telehealth transition have resulted in more frequent pathology and imaging requests but fewer test completion in the outpatients setting. This study has identified new clinical risks associated with the abrupt transition to telehealth during COVID-19 that should be explored in future studies and appropriately mitigated.

Utility of Zwolle Risk Score in Guiding Low-Risk STEMI Discharge.

BACKGROUND: Despite emerging evidence suggesting that selected patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated successfully with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may be considered for early discharge, STEMI patients are typically hospitalised longer to monitor for serious complications. METHODS: We assessed the feasibility of identifying low-risk STEMI patients in our institution for early discharge using the Zwolle risk score (ZRS). We evaluated consecutive STEMI patients who underwent successful PPCI within the period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017. Low-risk was defined as ZRS≤3. Demographic, angiographic characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, stroke, congestive cardiac failure, and non-fatal myocardial infarction, were recorded. RESULTS: There were 183 STEMI patients in our study cohort (mean age 62.0±12.2 years, 77.0% male). The median ZRS was 2 (interquartile range 1-4) with 132 (72.1%) patients classified as low-risk. The overall 30-day MACE and mortality rates were 10.4% and 3.3% respectively. None of the 35 (26.5%) low-risk patients who were discharged within 72 hours experienced MACE at 30 days. Low-risk STEMI patients had significantly shorter median LOS (86.3 vs. 93.2 hours, p=0.002), lower 30-day MACE (4.5% vs. 25.5%, p<0.0001) and mortality (0% vs. 11.8%, p<0.0001) compared to high-risk group (ZRS>3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses for ZRS in predicting 30-day MACE and mortality yielded C-statistics of 0.79 (95%CI 0.68-0.90, p<0.0001) and 0.98 (95%CI 0.95-1.00, p<0.0001) respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-risk STEMI patients stratified by Zwolle risk score, who were treated successfully with PPCI, experienced low 30-day MACE and mortality rates, indicating that early discharge may be safe in these patients. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the safety of ZRS-guided early discharge of STEMI patients, as well as the economic and psychological impacts.