Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 103(5): 721-726, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28554810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Screw loosening has been reported for non-fusion devices. Forces on pedicle screws could be related to kinematic parameters as the interpedicular displacement (ID), which consists of the displacement between superior and inferior screw heads from full extension to full flexion. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between ID and screw loosening for different designs of posterior implants using a finite element model. METHODS: An L3-sacrum previously validated spine FE model was used. Three-rod designs were considered in L4-L5 segment: a rigid screw-rod implant, a flexible one and a specific design with a sliding rod providing limited restrain in ID. In order to simulate intermediate configurations, the friction coefficient between the sliding rods and connectors were varied. The sacrum was rigidly fixed. Rotations (flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation) were applied to L3, for each modeled configuration: intact, injured, injured with different implants. Model consistency was checked with existing experimental in vitro data on intact and instrumented segments. Screw loads were computed as well as ID. RESULTS: In flexion-extension, the ID was less than 2mm for rigid (R) and flexible (F) constructs and 5.5mm for intact spine and the sliding implant (S3). Screw's shear forces were 272N, 153N, 43N respectively for R, F and S3 constructs. CONCLUSIONS: Implants that allow ID presented lower screws loads. A compromise between the ability of the implant to withstand compressive forces, which requires longitudinal stiffness, and its ability to allow ID could be important for future implant designs in order to prevent screw loosening.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Pedicle Screws/adverse effects , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Biomechanical Phenomena , Computer Simulation , Equipment Failure Analysis , Finite Element Analysis , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Prosthesis Design , Range of Motion, Articular , Rotation , Stress, Mechanical
2.
Surg Radiol Anat ; 34(8): 757-65, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21986986

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Quantitative assessment of 3D clinical indices may be crucial for elbow surgery planning. 3D parametric modeling from bi-planar radiographs was successfully proposed for spine and lower limb clinical investigation as an alternative for CT-scan. The aim of this study was to adapt this method to the upper limb with a preliminary validation. METHODS: CT-scan 3D models of humerus, radius and ulna were obtained from 20 cadaveric upper limbs and yielded parametric models made of geometric primitives. Primitives were defined by descriptor parameters (diameters, angles...) and correlations between these descriptors were found. Using these correlations, a semi-automated reconstruction method of humerus using bi-planar radiographs was achieved: a 3D personalized parametric model was built, from which clinical parameters were computed [orientation and projections on bone surface of trochlea sulcus to capitulum (CTS) axis, trochlea sulcus anterior offset and width of distal humeral epiphysis]. This method was evaluated by accuracy compared to CT-scan and reproducibility. RESULTS: Points-to-surface mean distance was 0.9 mm (2 RMS = 2.5 mm). For clinical parameters, mean differences were 0.4-1.9 mm and from 1.7° to 2.3°. All parameters except from angle formed by CTS axis and bi-epicondylar axis in transverse plane were reproducible. Reconstruction time was about 5 min. CONCLUSIONS: The presented method provides access to morphological upper limb parameters with very low level of radiation. Preliminary in vitro validation for humerus showed that it is fast and accurate enough to be used in clinical daily practice as an alternative to CT-scan for total elbow arthroplasty pre operative evaluation.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Models, Biological , Models, Statistical , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Upper Extremity/anatomy & histology , Upper Extremity/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Humerus/anatomy & histology , Humerus/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...