Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurotrauma Rep ; 2(1): 669-675, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35018367

ABSTRACT

This article aims to evaluate the predictive factors of morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients who suffered gunshot wounds to the head. We reviewed a series of 43 patients who were admitted to a referential neurosurgical hospital between 2010 and 2019. Data from 43 patients who underwent a surgical treatment in our institution were collected, and the following parameters were considered in the analysis: the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), age, sex, bullet entry site, and bullet trajectory. Computed tomography (CT) scans at admission, complications, midline crossing, and Glasgow score scale at the time of discharge (Glasgow Outcome Scale; GOS) were also factored in. Male sex corresponded to 90.7% of cases (N = 39), and 16-17 years of age was the most common age (60.5%). The frontal region was the most common entry site (41.9%), followed by the parietal wall and occipital entry. Penetrating trajectory was shown in 48.8% of cases, perforation/transfixing in 39.5%, and tangential in 11.6%. CT showed that sinking is the most common alteration (74.4%), followed by cerebral contusion (44.2%). According to the GOS, 23.3% died, 23.3% were classified by an unfavorable outcome (GOS, 2-3), and 53.5% a favorable outcome (GOS, 4 and 5). In our study, there was a significant association between the low GCS scores on admission and low GOS (1-3; p = 0.001) at time of discharge. Patients with wounds that crossed the midline also had a significant association with low GOS (p = 0.014) in our clinical experience. We concluded that low GCS scores at admission and children with a wound that crosses the midline are predictive factors of high mortality and morbidity, in our clinical experience.

2.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 8(2): 120-128, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29708208

ABSTRACT

Background: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) has profound consequences on patients and their families. In this multicenter study, we investigated the contribution of cognitive and neuropsychiatric factors to everyday function at different levels of overall functional impairment. Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional study, 109 patients with bvFTD from 4 specialist frontotemporal dementia centers (Australia, England, India, and Brazil) were included. The measures administered evaluated everyday function (Disability Assessment for Dementia [DAD]), dementia staging (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]), general cognition (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised [ACE-R]), and neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory [NPI]). Patients were then subdivided according to functional impairment on the DAD into mild, moderate, severe, and very severe subgroups. Three separate multiple linear regression analyses were run, where (1) total DAD, (2) basic activities of daily living (BADL), and (3) instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores were dependent variables; ACE-R total score and selected NPI domains (agitation/aggression, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior) were used as independent variables. Age, sex, education, and country of origin were controlled for in the analyses. Results: Cognitive deficits were similar across the mild, moderate, and severe subgroups but significantly worse in the very severe subgroup. NPI domain scores (agitation/aggression, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior) did not differ across the DAD subgroups. In the multiple regression analyses, a model including ACE-R and NPI apathy explained 32.5% of the variance for total DAD scores. For IADL, 35.6% of the variance was explained by the ACE-R only. No model emerged for BADL scores. Conclusions: Cognitive deficits and apathy are key contributors to functional disability in bvFTD but factors underlying impairment in BADLs remain unclear. Treatments targeting reduction of disability need to address apathy and cognitive impairment to ensure greater efficacy, especially in regards to IADLs.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...