Updating the CoFAR Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions in Food Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy is promising as an efficacious treatment for food allergy. Other food allergy treatments are also under development. However, adverse allergic events during treatment, as well as during oral food challenges, are common and reporting is not standardized. OBJECTIVE: A more nuanced grading scale is needed to create a comprehensive and universal system to categorize adverse events and their severity for food allergy clinical trials. METHODS: Starting with the 2012 Consortium for Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Grading Scale and the World Allergy Organization Grading System, we developed the CoFAR Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions, Version 3.0, in collaboration with industry partners with expert opinion. RESULTS: The revised CoFAR Grading Scale for Systemic Allergic Reactions has 5 levels of increasing severity, ranging from generalized urticaria, localized angioedema, rhinitis, and abdominal pain (grade 1) to death (grade 5). Systemic reactions are further categorized within each grade by relevant organ system. Mild, single-system reactions are differentiated from mild, multisystem reactions. Lower respiratory tract symptoms are graded on the basis of response to therapy; those that are refractory to standard treatment (eg, requiring >3 doses of intramuscular epinephrine, continuous intravenous epinephrine infusion, and continuous albuterol nebulization) and respiratory compromise requiring mechanical ventilation are classified as grade 4, life-threatening reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Universal and consistent use of the revised CoFAR Grading Scale beyond the CoFAR centers would allow for better data aggregation and safety comparisons in clinical trials for food allergy.

Changes in Neutrophil-Lymphocyte or Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratios and Their Associations with Clinical Outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) could aid assessment of disease severity and prediction of progression and response to treatment. This analysis examined reference ranges for neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in IPF, and the relationship between NLR or PLR changes and clinical outcomes over 12 months. This post hoc analysis included patients with IPF from the Phase III, double-blind trials of pirfenidone, ASCEND (NCT01366209) and CAPACITY (NCT00287716 and NCT00287729). The relationship between change from baseline to Month 12 in NLR or PLR (divided into quartiles (Q1-Q4)) and outcomes (mortality, respiratory hospitalization, declines in lung function, exercise capacity and quality of life) was assessed. Estimated reference ranges at baseline for all patients analyzed (n = 1334) were 1.1-6.4 for NLR and 56.8-250.5 for PLR. Significant trends were observed across NLR and PLR quartiles for all outcomes in placebo-treated patients, with patients manifesting the greatest NLR or PLR changes experiencing the worst outcomes. These results suggest that the greatest NLR or PLR changes over 12 months were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the utility of NLR and PLR as prognostic biomarkers in IPF.

Patient and site characteristics associated with pirfenidone and nintedanib use in the United States; an analysis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients enrolled in the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pragmatic use of the anti-fibrotic medications pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the United States (US) has not been studied and may be different from international settings due to structural differences between health care systems. This study examined the relationship between patient- and site-level characteristics and anti-fibrotic (a) use and (b) selection. METHODS: Data from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry was used to perform univariable and multivariable regressions with generalized linear mixed models. A random effects model examined registry site variation. RESULTS: 703 of 1218 (57.7%) patients were taking a single anti-fibrotic of which 312 (44.4%) were taking nintedanib and 391 (55.6%) were taking pirfenidone. Up to 25% of patients using an anti-fibrotic may have been excluded from clinical trial participation due to having too severe disease as measured by diffusion limitation for carbon monoxide. Age (OR = 0.974, p = 0.0086) and diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (per 10% increase in percent-predicted; OR = 0.896, p = 0.0007) was negatively associated with anti-fibrotic use while time (in log of days) since diagnosis (OR = 1.138, p < 0.0001), recent patient clinical trial participation (OR = 1.569, p = 0.0433) and oxygen use (OR = 1.604, p = 0.0027) was positively associated with anti-fibrotic use. Time (log of days) since diagnosis (OR = 1.075, p = 0.0477), history of coronary artery disease (OR = 1.796, p = 0.0030), presence of pulmonary hypertension (OR = 2.139, p = 0.0376), patient clinical trial participation in the prior 12 months (OR = 2.485, p = 0.0002), diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (per 10% increase in percent-predicted; OR = 1.138, p = 0.0184), anticoagulant use (OR = 2.507, p = 0.0028), and enrollment at a registry site in the Midwest region (OR = 1.600, p = 0.0446) were associated with pirfenidone use. Anti-fibrotic use varied by registry site. Rates of discontinuation were modest and nearly identical for the two medications with side effects being the most common reason given for discontinuation. Twenty-three percent (23%, 274) of persons with IPF were using or had recently used an immunomodulatory agent. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides a detailed characterization of IPF treatment patterns in the US; many users of anti-fibrotic medications may not have qualified for inclusion in clinical trials. More research is needed to understand variations in medical decision-making for use and selection of anti-fibrotic medication.

Physician characteristics associated with treatment initiation patterns in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Pirfenidone and nintedanib are oral antifibrotic agents approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Real-world data on factors that influence IPF treatment decisions are limited. Physician characteristics associated with antifibrotic therapy initiation following an IPF diagnosis were examined in a sample of US pulmonologists. An online, self-administered survey was fielded to pulmonologists between April 10, 2017, and May 17, 2017. Pulmonologists were included if they spent >20% of their time in direct patient care and had ≥5 patients with IPF receiving antifibrotics. Participants answered questions regarding timing and reasons for considering the initiation of antifibrotic therapy after an IPF diagnosis. A total of 169 pulmonologists participated. The majority (81.7%) considered initiating antifibrotic therapy immediately after IPF diagnosis all or most of the time (immediate group), while 18.3% considered it only some of the time or not at all (delayed group). Pulmonologists in the immediate group were more likely to work in private practice (26.1%), have a greater mean percentage of patients receiving antifibrotic therapy (60.8%), and decide to initiate treatment themselves (31.2%) versus those in the delayed group (16.1%, 30.5%, and 16.1%, respectively). Most pulmonologists consider initiating antifibrotic treatment immediately after establishing an IPF diagnosis all or most of the time versus using a "watch-and-wait" approach. Distinguishing characteristics between pulmonologists in the immediate group versus the delayed group included practice setting, percentage of patients receiving antifibrotic therapy, and the decision-making dynamics between the patient and the pulmonologist.

Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and more advanced lung function impairment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) demonstrate a range of lung function impairment. However, the efficacy of antifibrotics compared with placebo has not been assessed in patients with more advanced disease. This post-hoc analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of pirfenidone versus placebo in patients with IPF and more advanced lung function impairment, defined as percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) < 50% and/or percent predicted carbon monoxide diffusing capacity <35%. METHODS: Patients randomised to pirfenidone 2,403 mg/day or placebo in the ASCEND (NCT01366209) and CAPACITY (NCT00287716; NCT00287729) trials with more advanced baseline lung function impairment (pirfenidone, n = 90; placebo, n = 80) were included. Mortality, lung function, hospitalisation, exercise capacity and dyspnoea were investigated over 52 weeks. RESULTS: At Week 52 versus placebo, pirfenidone was associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.86; p=0.0180), ≥10% absolute %FVC decline or all-cause mortality (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23-0.69; p=0.0006) and ≥10% absolute %FVC decline or respiratory-related hospitalisation or all-cause mortality (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.28-0.76; p=0.0018). At Week 52, median treatment differences favouring pirfenidone were 36.7 m for 6-min walk distance and -8.0 points for the University of California-San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire total score. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to discontinuation in 14.4% and 21.3% of patients with pirfenidone and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pirfenidone demonstrated clinically relevant benefits across multiple domains in patients with IPF and more advanced disease without an increased risk of discontinuation due to TEAEs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials. gov (ASCEND: NCT01366209; CAPACITY: NCT00287716; NCT00287729).

Efficacy of Pirfenidone in the Context of Multiple Disease Progression Events in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Declines in percent predicted FVC (% predicted FVC), declines in 6-min walk distance (6MWD), and respiratory hospitalizations are events associated with disease progression and mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The incidence of multiple events in the same patient over 12 months of pirfenidone treatment is unknown. METHODS: Patients who received pirfenidone 2,403 mg/d (n = 623) or placebo (n = 624) in the ASCEND (study 016; NCT01366209) and CAPACITY (studies 004 and 006; NCT00287716 and NCT00287729) phase III trials were included in this post hoc analysis. Disease progression events were defined as relative decline in % predicted FVC ≥ 10%, absolute decline in 6MWD ≥ 50 m, respiratory hospitalization, or death from any cause. The incidence of disease progression events over 12 months was assessed. RESULTS: The most frequent disease progression events were declines in % predicted FVC (pirfenidone vs placebo; 202 vs 304 events) and declines in 6MWD (pirfenidone vs placebo; 265 vs 348 events). Fewer patients who received pirfenidone had more than one progression event compared with placebo (17.0% vs 30.1%; P < .0001). Death following one or more progression event occurred less frequently in the pirfenidone group than in the placebo group (2.1% vs 6.3%; P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: Pirfenidone significantly reduced the incidence of multiple progression events and death after a progression event over 12 months of treatment compared with placebo. These findings suggest that continued treatment with pirfenidone confers a benefit despite the occurrence of any single disease progression event. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; Nos. NCT01366209, NCT00287716, and NCT00287729; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Dose modification and dose intensity during treatment with pirfenidone: analysis of pooled data from three multinational phase III trials.

INTRODUCTION: Temporary dose modifications, such as reductions or interruptions, may allow patients to better manage adverse events (AEs) associated with pirfenidone use and continue treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the impact of such dosing adjustments on efficacy and safety is uncertain. METHODS: Patients randomised to receive treatment with pirfenidone 2403 mg/day or placebo in the Clinical Studies Assessing Pirfenidone in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Research of Efficacy and Safety Outcomes (CAPACITY (Study 004 (NCT00287716)) and Study 006 (NCT00287729))) and Assessment of Pirfenidone to Confirm Efficacy and Safety in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ASCEND (Study 016 (NCT01366209)) trials were included in the analysis (n=1247). Descriptive statistics and a linear mixed-effects model (slope analysis) for annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) by dose intensity were performed. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarised and grouped by dose intensity or body size. RESULTS: Dose reductions and interruptions occurred in 76.9% (95% CI 73.4% to 80.1%) and 46.5% (95% CI 42.6% to 50.6%) of patients receiving pirfenidone vs 72.0% (95% CI 68.3% to 75.4%) and 31.1% (95% CI 27.5% to 34.9%) of patients receiving placebo, respectively. Dose interruptions tended to occur during the first 6 months of treatment, whereas dose reductions exhibited more variability. Less FVC decline from baseline was observed in patients receiving pirfenidone versus placebo at >90% dose intensity (p<0.001) or ≤90% dose intensity (p=0.0191), showing treatment benefit in both subgroups of dose intensity. No meaningful relationship between weight and TEAEs was observed. CONCLUSION: Dose interruptions, which may be required to manage TEAEs, mostly occurred during the first 6 months of treatment. Despite dose reductions and interruptions, most patients with IPF maintained relatively high dose intensity on pirfenidone, without compromising its treatment effect compared with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00287729, NCT00287716, NCT01366209.

Effect of pirfenidone on gastric emptying in a rat model.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) are commonly reported in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who are treated with pirfenidone. Taking pirfenidone with a substantial amount of food or dividing the dose over the course of a meal has been reported to reduce the frequency of GI AEs in clinical practice. In humans, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of pirfenidone was reduced when the drug was taken with food compared with the fasting state, and the lower Cmax was associated with a reduction in GI AE rates. In this study, the effects of the divided-dose approach and timing of pirfenidone administration relative to meal intake on gastric emptying were assessed using a rat model. The aim of this study was to investigate whether modification of dosing regimens could minimize pirfenidone's effect on inhibition of gastric emptying. METHODS: Gastric emptying was assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats after administration of a test meal by weighing stomach contents at various time points up to 120 min after the meal. Pirfenidone was administered via oral gavage either as a single-bolus dose of 30 mg/kg or as divided doses of 3 × 10 mg/kg at intervals ranging from 10 to 30 min for a total duration of 30 to 90 min. In addition, the test meal was given either at 30 min before, coincident with, or 30 min following pirfenidone oral administration. RESULTS: Administration of an oral 30-mg/kg single-bolus dose of pirfenidone with a meal resulted in a statistically significant decrease in gastric emptying in a rat model. The effect of pirfenidone on decreasing gastric emptying was lessened when the same total dose (i.e., 30 mg/kg) was administered as 3 divided doses (i.e., 3 × 10 mg/kg) over intervals up to 30 min in between each divided dose. Pharmacokinetic simulation suggested that a divided-dosing regimen would decrease pirfenidone Cmax relative to single-bolus administration. When the same single-bolus dose of 30 mg/kg was administered 30 min following a meal rather than coincident with a meal, pirfenidone's effect on decreasing gastric emptying was reduced to the same extent as when the dose was divided as 3 × 10 mg/kg over a 90-min period. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of pirfenidone 30 min after a meal as a single-bolus dose or a divided dose over a 90-min period blunted pirfenidone's effect on inhibition of gastric emptying in rats compared with pirfenidone administration as a single-bolus dose coincident with a meal. Decreased gastric emptying, which is associated with pirfenidone administration, may be one of the contributing factors leading to GI tolerability issues associated with pirfenidone use in humans. Modification of the dosing regimen diminished this impact and may provide insight into possible mitigation strategies to minimize GI-related toxicities in the clinic.

Real-World Practice Patterns for Prevention and Management of Potential Adverse Events with Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Pirfenidone is an oral antifibrotic agent approved for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Real-world data on adverse event (AE) management for pirfenidone are limited. Strategies for managing potential antifibrotic therapy AEs were examined in a sample of US pulmonologists. METHODS: An online, self-administered survey was fielded to pulmonologists between April 10 and May 17, 2017. Pulmonologists were included if they spent > 20% of their time in direct patient care and had ≥ 5 patients with IPF on antifibrotic therapy. Participants answered questions regarding initiation of pirfenidone, dose titration, and management of potential AEs. RESULTS: A total of 169 pulmonologists participated. Gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance was the most important factor in implementing alternative titration schedules for pirfenidone. Approximately three-quarters of pulmonologists recommended the standard titration scheme for starting treatment; however, a range of titration schedules up to 8 weeks were described, with a 4-week schedule being most common. Pulmonologists reported that most patients treated with alternative titration schedules could achieve the full dose of pirfenidone. Pulmonologists who were most effective at mitigating pirfenidone-related GI AEs by advising dosing at mealtimes more frequently recommended taking pirfenidone during a substantial meal than pulmonologists who were less effective. For photosensitivity AEs, pulmonologists recommended sunscreen use, sun avoidance, wearing a hat, and ultraviolet protection factor clothing. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonologists reported that alternative titration schedules for initiating pirfenidone were common and can aid in maintaining the full dose. Proposed strategies to ameliorate pirfenidone-related GI and photosensitivity AEs included taking pirfenidone during a substantial meal and minimizing sun exposure, respectively. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.

Baseline asthma burden, comorbidities, and biomarkers in omalizumab-treated patients in PROSPERO.

BACKGROUND: Patients included in clinical trials do not necessarily reflect the real-world population. OBJECTIVE: To understand the characteristics, including disease and comorbidity burden, of patients with asthma receiving omalizumab in a real-world setting. METHODS: The Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate Predictors of Clinical Effectiveness in Response to Omalizumab (PROSPERO) was a US-based, multicenter, single-arm, and prospective study. Patients (≥12 years of age) with allergic asthma initiating omalizumab treatment based on physician-assessed need were included and followed for 12 months. Exacerbations, health care use, adverse events, and Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores were assessed monthly. Biomarkers (blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and periostin) were evaluated and patient-reported outcomes (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for 12 Years and Older [AQLQ+12] and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Asthma questionnaire [WPAI:Asthma]) were completed at baseline and months 6 and 12. The Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) was completed at baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: Most of the 806 enrollees (91.4%) were adults (mean age 47.3 years, SD 17.4), white (70.3%), and female (63.5%). Allergic comorbidity was frequently reported (84.2%), as were hypertension (35.5%) and depression (22.1%). In the 12 months before study entry, 22.1% of patients reported at least 1 asthma-related hospitalization, 60.7% reported at least 2 exacerbations, and 83.3% reported ACT scores no higher than 19 (uncontrolled asthma). Most patients had low biomarker levels based on prespecified cut-points. Baseline mean patient-reported outcome scores were 4.0 (SD 1.4) for AQLQ+12, 2.7 (SD 1.4) for MiniRQLQ, and 47.7 (SD 28.9) for WPAI:Asthma percentage of activity impairment and 33.5 (SD 28.7) for percentage of overall work impairment. CONCLUSION: The population initiating omalizumab in PROSPERO reported poorly controlled asthma and a substantial disease burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01922037.

Delayed onset and protracted progression of anaphylaxis after omalizumab administration in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Risk of anaphylaxis is included in the prescribing information for omalizumab, but the nature of these reactions merits further elaboration. OBJECTIVE: To describe cases of anaphylaxis associated with omalizumab administration in patients with asthma. METHODS: We reviewed spontaneous postmarketing adverse event reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System database and to the manufacturers of omalizumab and cases published in the literature through December 2006. Diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis outlined by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network were used to screen cases. RESULTS: One-hundred twenty-four cases of anaphylaxis associated with omalizumab administration in patients with asthma were identified. Many cases had a delayed onset of symptoms beyond 2 hours after dose administration. Many cases were also characterized by a protracted progression, with individual signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis staggered over hours. Review of the case reports did not reveal any predictive risk factors for the delayed onset or protracted progression of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab-induced anaphylaxis may be characterized by a delayed onset and a protracted progression of symptoms. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The unusual timing of anaphylaxis in these cases challenges our understanding of anaphylaxis. A delayed onset of symptoms and protracted progression of anaphylaxis should be taken into account when administering omalizumab.

Long-term immunologic effects of broad-spectrum aeroallergen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding extended, long-term immunologic effects of immunotherapy in polysensitized individuals. To study possible long-term effects, skin tests and specific IgE levels were obtained from subjects who had previously received broad-spectrum aeroallergen immunotherapy years before. METHODS: Eighty-two subjects (78% male, mean age 23 years) previously enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of immunotherapy for treatment of childhood allergic asthma were reevaluated in adulthood (mean follow-up interval, 10.8 years) by puncture skin tests and CAP-RAST levels for major aeroallergens. All completed at least 18 months (median 27 months) of maintenance active treatment or placebo injections without subsequent immunotherapy. RESULTS: At adult follow-up, 36% of all skin tests to treatment allergens among subjects who received immunotherapy (n = 41) had significantly reduced intensity versus 26% of skin tests among placebo recipients (n = 41; p = 0.03). No significant differences were noted for individual treatment allergens. No significant differences were observed in the long-term changes of serum-specific IgE antibody levels for all treatment allergens between immunotherapy treatment and placebo groups (p = 0.43). The treatment and placebo groups had a similar acquisition of new skin test sensitivities from time of randomization in the original childhood trial to debriefing (15 vs. 20%; p = 0.28) and to adult follow-up (30 vs. 31%; p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy suppresses skin test sensitivity 8-16 years after discontinuation of treatment, but long-term effects on specific IgE levels in serum are not observed. Broad-spectrum immunotherapy does not appear to affect the acquisition of new inhalant sensitivities.

Irreversible lung function deficits in young adults with a history of childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma, traditionally characterized as reversible airway obstruction, might lead to structural changes and permanent impairment. OBJECTIVE: We sought to study the frequency, severity, and reversibility of pulmonary deficits in adults with a history of moderate-to-severe childhood allergic asthma. METHODS: Subjects (n = 121) previously enrolled in a randomized trial of immunotherapy for childhood asthma were recalled. Eighty-four young adults (age, 17-30 years; 78% male) were reevaluated by means of spirometry. Subjects with a postbronchodilator FEV1, forced vital capacity, or FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio less than or equal to the 5th percentile or 2 or more indices less than or equal to the 10th percentile (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III normative data) were invited to undergo complete pulmonary function testing, physical examination, and chest radiography after 1 week of 1 mg/kg daily prednisone. RESULTS: Of 84 subjects reevaluated, 40 (48%) had one or more spirometric indices less than or equal to the 5th and 10th percentiles (P < .0001). Twenty-eight of the 40 subjects were reassessed after prednisone treatment, of whom 21 (75%) did not improve. Adult and childhood (age 5-12 years) spirometric results were positively correlated (r = 0.49-0.72, P < .001). Abnormal adult spirometric results were associated with a longer duration of asthma at enrollment in the original trial (4.6 vs 6 years, P=.02), increased childhood methacholine sensitivity (PC20, 0.11 vs 0.18 mg/mL; P = .01), and birth prematurity (adjusted odds ratio, 10.7; 95% CI, 1.4-84.5). Immunotherapy status was unrelated to adult lung function. CONCLUSIONS: Many adults with a history of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in childhood have irreversible lung function deficits. Childhood spirometry, duration of asthma, methacholine sensitivity, and birth prematurity might identify such individuals at a young age.

Adult asthma severity in individuals with a history of childhood asthma.

BACKGROUND: Childhood asthma can have a range of outcomes in adulthood. OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical features and exposures associated with persistence and severity of childhood asthma in adulthood. METHODS: Eighty-five of 121 subjects previously enrolled in a study of immunotherapy for childhood allergic asthma (age 5-12 years) were re-evaluated with allergy skin testing, spirometry, and interviews about asthma symptoms and medications. These young adults (age 17-30 years; 74% male) all had moderate to severe childhood asthma. Adult asthma severity was scored by using a modified version of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute severity categories. RESULTS: Thirteen (15.3%) of 85 adult subjects were in remission despite persistent childhood asthma. Another 19 subjects (22.4%) had only intermittent asthma. The remaining 53 had persistent asthma, of whom 12 (14.1%) had mild asthma, 25 (29.4%) had moderate asthma, and 16 (18.8%) had severe asthma. Subjects in remission, compared with subjects with intermittent or persistent asthma, had lower total serum IgE in childhood (412 ng/mL vs 1136 ng/mL vs 968 ng/mL; P = .02) and fewer positive allergy skin tests (7 vs 9 vs 10 from panel of 18; P = .02). Subjects in remission also had milder childhood asthma, indicated by lower average daily medication usage scores (1.6 vs 3.5 vs 4.4; P = .005) and lower percentage of days on inhaled corticosteroids (13.7% vs 24.7% vs 40.9%; P = .008). No significant association was found between current asthma severity and childhood immunotherapy ( P = .46). CONCLUSION: The prognosis of childhood allergic asthma in adulthood is largely determined early in life. The degree of atopy appears to be a critical determinant of asthma persistence.