Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(6): 5093-5098, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35224655

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate sexual function, body image, quality of life, and disease progression rates in women with advanced cancer. METHODS: Sixty women staged III-IV breast, gynaecological, or colorectal cancer completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Body Image Scale, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTQL), and the Beck Depression Inventory. Forty-three women (71.67%) completed the questionnaires again approximately 1 year later. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the scores between the two evaluations. The participants were informed that they could attend additional consultations for symptom control or management of sexual difficulties if they wished. RESULTS: Twenty-eight women showed disease progression (65.12%), and seven died. Twenty-one women remained sexually active (48.8%), all of whom were married/partnered. There was no difference in the FSFI score over time [28 (21.4-32.1) vs. 30.3 (24.2-33.3) P = 0.19]. The body image scores improved [6 (1-15) vs. 3 (0-10), P = 0.039], while the perceived global health status worsened [EORTQL: 75 (50-83.3) vs. 41.7 (25-50), P = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Body image scores improved over time despite a concomitant decrease in the perceived global health status. A portion of women with recurrent or metastatic cancer remained interested in sexual intimacy. New studies are needed to understand the differences between the needs of women with advanced cancer who are vs. are not sexually active, for the development of more effective therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological , Body Image , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Sexual Behavior , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 22(1): 93-97, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33507684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported the safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer, as option to laparotomy. This study aims to compare overall survival between laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 patients with clinically staged IA2 cervical cancer and lymphovascular invasion, IB and IIA, who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (16) or abdominal radical hysterectomy (14). RESULT: The mean overall survival time was 74.74 months (CI 95%: 54.15-95.33) for LRH 91.67 months (CI 95%: 74.97-108.37) for ARH (log-rank test = 0.30). The mean disease-free survival time was 81.07 months (CI 95%: 60.95-101.19) for LRH and 95.82 months (CI 95%: 80.18-111.47) for ARH (log-rank test = 0.371). The overall survival hazard ratio was 2.05 (CI 95%: 0.51-8.24), and the disease-free hazard ratio was 2.13 (CI 95%: 0.39-11.7). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a non-significant trend of worse outcomes for LRH. In light of recent controversy and need for prospective studies, further studies in different populations are required for definite conclusions and until then, patients should be aware of risks and benefits, survival data and quality of life outcomes related to both surgical techniques.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/mortality , Laparoscopy/mortality , Lymph Node Excision/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Young Adult
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(1): 109-113, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-892950

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Introduction Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use. Objective To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital. Materials and Methods Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings. Results Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001). Conclusion Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Urologic Surgical Procedures/economics , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/economics , Suburethral Slings/economics , Brazil , Health Care Costs , Hospitals, Public , Middle Aged
4.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(1): 109-113, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29135411

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered.


Subject(s)
Suburethral Slings/economics , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/economics , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures/economics , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Female , Health Care Costs , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Middle Aged , Young Adult
5.
Ann Surg Innov Res ; 7(1): 13, 2013 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24088385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy dates back to 120BC and is the second most commonly performed gynecological surgery in the world. Cosmetic demands and the necessity of rapid return to work have contributed to the minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for hysterectomy. The majority of reports describe the use of three or four incisions to perform the surgery (two or three for manipulation and one for optics). METHODS: This work describes our experience with using only two ports for 11 patients who underwent video-laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery. One port was used for the optical system, and the second was used for manipulation. Early and late surgery complications, as well as the time to return to work and daily activities, were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 41.4 years old (range 16 to 52 years) and the mean uterine weight was 133.54 g, ranging from 35 g and 291 g. The operative time ranged from 30 to 60 minutes (average 46.4 minutes) and the hospital stay ranged between 24 and 48 hrs. No intraoperative complications occurred, and no early or late postoperative complications were recorded. Patients reported minimal pain during the first 24-48 hrs in the hospital. Patients returned to their daily activities within seven days after surgery. Clinical care follow-up continued until the 40th postoperative day. CONCLUSION: The laparoscopic hysterectomy technique with a single port for manipulation is a feasible procedure when the uterine weight is not greater than 400 mg with little postoperative pain. The patients had an early return-to-work and daily activities and a better cosmetic outcome. These preliminary data led us to make the one-operative port laparoscopic hysterectomy the procedure of choice for patients with a low uterine weight.

6.
Trials ; 14: 293, 2013 Sep 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028441

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-randomised studies have suggested that the postoperative complications of (Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, Kalil AN) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are similar to those in abdominal radical hysterectomy. However, no study evaluating postoperative pain comparing both techniques has been published thus far. Our objective was to compare pain intensity and other perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early cervical cancer. METHODS: This single centre, randomised, controlled trial enrolled 30 cervical cancer patients who were clinically staged IA2 with lymph vascular invasion and IB according to the FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification, and underwent LRH or ARH between late 1999 and early 2004. Postoperative pain, as measured by a 10-point numerical rate scale, was considered the primary endpoint. Postoperative pain was assessed every six hours during a patient's usual postoperative care. Perioperative outcomes were also registered. Both surgical techniques were executed by the same surgical team. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and other postoperative surgicopathological factors and 5-year survival rates. RESULTS: IA2 patients with lymphatic vascular space invasion and IB cervical cancer patients were randomised to either the LRH group (16 patients) or the ARH group (14 patients). Four patients (25%) in the LRH group and 5 patients (36%) in the ARH group presented with transoperative or serious postoperative complications. All of the transoperative complications occurred in the LRH group. The relative risk of presenting with complications was 0.70; CI 95% (0.23-2.11); P = 0.694. LRH group mean pain score was significantly lower than ARH after 36 h of observation (P = 0.044; mean difference score: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.04-2.80). The survival results will be published elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: LRH provided lower pain scores after 36 h of observation in this series. The perioperative and serious postoperative complications ratios were comparable between the groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01258413.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Brazil , Disease-Free Survival , Early Detection of Cancer , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/methods , Hysterectomy/mortality , Laparoscopy/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm Staging , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
7.
JSLS ; 13(4): 504-8, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20202391

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because of the advancements in surgical techniques and laparoscopic instruments, total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy can now be performed for the treatment of uterine cervical carcinoma. We assessed the feasibility, complications, and survival rates of patients who underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from the medical charts of 29 patients who had undergone surgery between 1998 and 2008. The following data were assessed: age, staging, histological type, number of lymph nodes retrieved, parametrial measures, operative time, length of hospital stay, surgical complications, and disease-free time. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 37.07+/-10.45 years. Forty percent of the patients had previously undergone abdominal or pelvic surgeries. Mean operative time was 228.96+/-60.41 minutes, and mean retrieved lymph nodes was 16.9+/-8.12. All patients had free margins. No conversions to laparotomy were necessary. Median time until hospital dismissal was 6.5 days (range 3-38 days). Four patients had intraoperative complications: 2 lacerations of the rectum, 1 laceration of the bladder, and 1 lesion of the ureter. Three patients developed bladder or ureteral fistulas postoperatively that were successfully corrected surgically. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is feasible and has acceptable complications. The radicalism of the surgery must be considered, bearing in mind the parametrial measures and the number of lymph nodes retrieved.


Subject(s)
Hysterectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Video-Assisted Surgery/methods , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasm Staging , Postoperative Complications , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
8.
J. bras. ginecol ; 98(9): 509-10, set. 1988.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-80646

ABSTRACT

A fecundaçäo do ovo ocorre no terço distal da trompa, podendo evoluir para: (1) nidaçäo intra-uterina e desenvolvimento normal de uma gestaçäo; (2) nidaçäo em outro local que näo a cavidade uterina e desenvolvimento de gestaçäo ectópica; (3) nidaçäo intra-uterina e transformaçäo em gestaçäo molar; (4) nidaçäo em outro local que näo a cavidade uterina e desenvolvimento anômalo do trofoblasto, propiciando a gestaçäo ectópica molar. O estudo anatompatológico da gestaçäo ectópica confere diagnóstico e tratamento apropriados. Aconselha-se a ressecçäo intramural da trompa em todos os casos de salpingectomia


Subject(s)
Pregnancy , Adult , Humans , Female , Hydatidiform Mole , Pregnancy, Ectopic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...