Comparison of the effect between traditional conservation and nasointestinal tube placement in adhesive small bowel obstruction: A matched case-control study.

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) causes a major burden in emergency medicine. Owing to in situ decompression, nasointestinal tube (NIT) placement has been increasingly used in clinical practice compared with traditional conservation (TC); however, the indications remain controversial. This study was designed to explore the indications for each treatment in ASBOs and then suggest the optimal strategy. After propensity score matching, 128 pairs were included (the NIT and TC groups). The occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs), peri-treatment clinical parameters, and radiological features were compared between the successful and failed treatment groups. According to different stages of the entire treatment, the independent risk factors for adverse effects for ASBO were analysed in phase I and phase II. In phase I, normal red blood cells (RBC) levels (p = 0.011) and a balanced sodium ion level (p = 0.016) positively affected the outcomes of TC treatment. In phase II, for the TC group, the successful treatment rate reached 79.5% for patients with ASBOs whose normal RBC levels (p = 0.006) or decreasing white blood cells (WBC) levels (p = 0.014) after treatment. For the NIT group, the treatment success rate was 68.1% for patients whose electrolyte imbalance could be reversed or whose neutrophil count/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels was lower than 4.3 (p = 0.018). TC treatment is highly recommended for patients with normal RBC counts and sodium levels pretreatment. After dynamic monitoring of the treatment process, for both the TC and NIT groups, once ASBOs had elevated inflammatory biomarkers or irreversible electrolyte disturbances, surgical interference was preferred.

Accuracy and applicability of the novel pneumoperitoneum three-dimensional volume rendering technique in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Background: The accurate diagnosis of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is challenging for surgeons. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that pneumoperitoneum 3-dimensional volume rendering (3DVR) can provide an accurate diagnosis and has applicability in ASBO. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who underwent preoperative pneumoperitoneum 3DVR and surgery for ASBO between October 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled. The surgical findings were taken as the gold standard, and the kappa test was used to verify the consistency of the pneumoperitoneum 3DVR results and surgical findings. Results: A total of 22 patients with ASBO were included in this study, 27 sites of obstruction adhesions were found during surgery, and 5 patients had both parietal adhesions and interintestinal adhesions. Sixteen parietal adhesions (16/16) were found using pneumoperitoneum 3DVR (κ=1.00; P<0.001), and the diagnosis of parietal adhesions on pneumoperitoneum 3DVR was perfectly consistent with the surgical findings. Eight (8/11) interintestinal adhesions were found using pneumoperitoneum 3DVR (κ=0.727; P<0.001), and the diagnosis of interintestinal adhesions on pneumoperitoneum 3DVR was substantially consistent with the surgical findings. Conclusions: The novel pneumoperitoneum 3DVR is accurate and applicable in ASBO. It can help personalize the treatment of patients and can be useful in planning a more effective surgical approach.

A multi-analysis of nomogram model for the identification of banded adhesions and matted adhesions in adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of the cause of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is very challenging for surgeons. We aimed to develop a nomogram model for the identification of banded adhesions (BA) and matted adhesions (MA) of ASBO. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled patients with ASBO between January 2012 and December 2020, classified into BA and MA groups according to the intraoperative findings. A nomogram model was developed by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients were included, with 117 (58.8%) cases of BA and 82 (41.2%) cases of MA. There were 150 patients designed for training the model, and the other 49 cases for validation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that prior surgery for once (p = 0.008), white blood cells (WBC) (p = 0.001), beak sign (p < 0.001), fat notch sign (p = 0.013), and mesenteric haziness (p = 0.005) were independently associated with BA. The AREA under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of the nomogram model in the training and validation sets were 0.861 (95% CI 0.802-0.921) and 0.884 (95% CI 0.789-0.980), respectively. The calibration plot demonstrated a good agreement. A decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram model was clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: The multi-analysis of the nomogram model might have a favorable clinical applicability for the identification of BA and MA in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Who would avoid severe adverse events from nasointestinal tube in small bowel obstruction? A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Nasointestinal tubes (NITs) have been increasingly used in patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO); However, severe adverse events (SAEs) of NITs might threaten the lives of patients. The indications of NITs need to be identified. This study was designed to explore the indications for the insertion of NITs in patients with SBO and to suggest the optimal strategies for individuals based on the outcomes of SAEs. METHODS: After propensity score matching, 68 pairs were included (Success group and failure group). The occurrence of SAEs and the clinical parameters were compared between the SAE group and the non-SAE group. Independent risk factors were evaluated among the subgroups. A novel scoring system was established to detect the subgroups that would benefit from NITs insertion. RESULTS: Successful implementation of NITs could avoid hypochloremia (p = 0.010), SAEs (p = 0.001), pneumonia (p = 0.006). SAEs occurred in 13 of 136 (9.6%) patients who accepted NITs insertion treatment. Risk factors for SAEs included tumors (p = 0.002), reduced BMI (p = 0.048), reduced hemoglobin (p = 0.001), abnormal activated partial thromboplastin time (p = 0.015) and elevated white blood cells (p = 0.002). A novel risk scoring system consists of hemoglobin before NITs insertion (95% CI 0.685, 0.893) and bowel obstruction symptoms relieved after NITs insertion (95% CI 0.575, 0.900) had the highest area under curve for predicting the occurrence of SAEs. We divided the risk score system into 3 grades, with the increasing grades, the rates of SAEs surged from 1.3% (1/74) to (6/11) 54.5%. CONCLUSION: NITs successfully insertion could avoid SAEs occurrence in SBO conservative treatment. SBO patients without anemia and could be relieved after NITs insertion could be the potential benefit group for this therapy.

The Bioinformatics-Based Analysis Identifies 7 Immune-Related Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers for Colon Cancer.

Colon cancer poses a great threat to human health. Currently, there is no effective treatment for colon cancer due to its complex causative factors. Immunotherapy has now become a new method for tumor treatment. In this study, 487 DEGs were screened from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and ImmPort database, and GeneOntology (GO) functional enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed. Hierarchical clustering of all samples revealed a significant correlation between colon cancer and immunity. The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) algorithm was used to identify key gene modules associated with immunity in colon cancer, here, module grey60 showed the highest correlation. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database to screen hub genes, and subsequently, 7 immune-related genes the most closely associated with colon cancer were identified by differential expression in cancer and paracancer. Finally, a risk prediction model was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) COX analysis, and the accuracy of the model was validated by GSE14333. This study determined that IRF4 and TNFRSF17 were immune-related genes in colon cancer, providing immune-related prognostic biomarkers for colon cancer.

TNFRSF11B Suppresses Memory CD4+ T Cell Infiltration in the Colon Cancer Microenvironment: A Multiomics Integrative Analysis.

Background: Colorectal cancer is a lethal cancer worldwide. Due to the low tumor mutation burden and low proportion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the microenvironment of most patients, innovative immunotherapeutic approaches need to be identified. Methods: Using the TCGA-COAD dataset (n = 514), we identified TNFRSF11B as a prognostic factor of colon cancer. An immunohistochemistry (IHC) dataset (n = 86), 290 single colorectal cancer cells (GSE81861), and 31 paired colon cancer transcriptional datasets were further applied to validate the function of TNFRSF11B, which was confirmed via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Results: A risk score system consisting of eight immune-related genes (IRGs) (FGFR2, ZC3HAV1L, TNFRSF11B, CD79A, IGHV3-11, IGHV3-21, IGKV2D-30, and IGKV6D-21) was constructed to predict the prognosis of colon cancer patients. Only TNFRSF11B was closely correlated with late-stage lymph node metastasis and worse survival outcomes (p = 0.010, p = 0.014, and p = 0.0061). In our IHC dataset, 72.09% (62/86) of the colon cancer patients had TNFRSF11B overexpression with significantly shorter overall survival times (p = 0.072). High TNFRSF11B expression typically had a later TNM stage (p = 0.067), a higher frequency of lymph node (p = 0.029) and lymphovascular (p = 0.007) invasion, and a higher incidence of pneumonia (p = 0.056) than their counterparts. The expression of six genes (KRT18, ARPC5L, ACTG1, ARPC2, EZR, and YWHAZ) related to pathogenic E. coli infection was simultaneously increased with TNFRSF11B overexpression via gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). These genes are involved in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, shigellosis, bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, and Salmonella infection. Finally, only activated memory CD4+ T cells (p = 0.017) were significantly decreased in the high TNFRSF11B expression group via CIBERSORT comparison, which was confirmed by TIMER2.0 analysis of the TCGA-COAD dataset. We also performed FACS analysis to show that TNFRSF11B decreased the infiltration of central memory CD4+ T cells and effector memory CD4+ T cells in the colorectal cancer microenvironment (all p <0.001). Conclusion: TNFRSF11B acts as a prognostic factor for colon cancer patients and could affect the colon cancer immune response. TNFRSF11B was closely related to lymph node invasion and pathogenic E. coli. infection, which may negatively affect memory-activated CD4+ T cell infiltration in colon cancer.

CDKN2B antisense RNA 1 suppresses tumor growth in human colorectal cancer by targeting MAPK inactivator dual-specificity phosphatase 1.

Aberrant expression of long noncoding RNA cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense RNA 1 (CDKN2B-AS1) has been detected in human colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to investigate the role of CDKN2B-AS1 and the underlying mechanism in human CRC. Gain- and loss-of-function assays were performed to explore the role of CDKN2B-AS1 in the malignant behavior of HCT116 and SW480 CRC cells in vitro and in vivo. RNA pull-down assay was conducted to identify the target of CDKN2B-AS1 in CRC cells. The physical and functional interactions between CDKN2B-AS1 and the target were examined. CDKN2B-AS1 inhibited CRC cell proliferation and migration while promoting apoptosis in vitro via activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/p38 signaling. CDKN2B-AS1 bound to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inactivator dual-specificity phosphatase 1 (DUSP1) in CRC cells. In contrast to CDKN2B-AS1, DUSP1 promoted CRC cell proliferation, suppressed apoptosis and inactivated MEK/ERK/p38 signaling in CRC cells. Furthermore, CDKN2B-AS1 overexpression attenuated DUSP1 expression in normal colonic myofibroblasts and CRC cells. Overexpression of DUSP1 effectively countered the activation of MEK/ERK/p38 signaling induced by CDKN2B-AS1 overexpression or further blocked MEK/ERK/p38 signaling suppressed by CDKN2B-AS1 silencing. In the mouse xenograft model, CDKN2B-AS1 suppressed CRC growth, whereas DUSP1 promoted CRC growth. CDKN2B-AS1 induced cell apoptosis while suppressing EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition), whereas DUSP1 suppressed cell apoptosis while inducing EMT in CRC, as evidenced by the alterations in the protein levels of apoptosis and EMT markers in tumor tissue samples. CDKN2B-AS1 regulates CRC cell growth and survival by targeting MAPK inactivator DUSP1.

LINC00200 contributes to the chemoresistance to oxaliplatin of gastric cancer cells via regulating E2F1/RAD51 axis.

The goal of this research was to decipher the biological functions and mechanism of long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 200 (LINC00200) in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, our data confirmed that LINC00200 expression was up-regulated in GC tissues and its high expression was correlated with the poor differentiation of GC tissues and lymph node metastasis of the patients. In vitro experiments indicated that, the overexpression of LINC00200 facilitated the proliferation of GC cells, constrained their apoptosis, and increased the IC50 of oxaliplatin (Oxa), whereas knockdown of LINC00200 exhibited the opposite effects. Additionally, we demonstrated that LINC00200 could bind to E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1), and the up-regulation of LINC00200 expression enhanced the binding between E2F1 and RAD51 promoter, hence promoting RAD51 transcription, while knockdown of LINC00200 inhibited the transcription of RAD51. In conclusion, LINC00200 may recruit E2F1 to the RAD51 recombinase (RAD51) promoter region, thereby up-regulating the expression of RAD51 and enhancing the chemoresistance of GC cells to Oxa. Our data suggested that LINC00200 could probably be a promising target for treating GC.

Knockdown of Forkhead box A1 suppresses the tumorigenesis and progression of human colon cancer cells through regulating the phosphatase and tensin homolog/Akt pathway.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the role and the underlying mechanisms of Forkhead box A1 (encoded by FOXA1) in colon cancer. METHODS: We analyzed FOXA1 mRNA and protein expression in colon cancer tissues and cell lines. We also silenced FOXA1 expression in HCT116 and SW480 cells to evaluate the effects on cell proliferation, cell cycle, migration, and invasion by using MTT, colony formation, flow cytometry, and the Transwell assay, respectively. RESULTS: FOXA1 immunostaining was higher in colon cancer tissues than adjacent healthy tissues. FOXA1 mRNA and protein expression was significantly increased in human colon cancer cells compared with a normal colonic cell line. FOXA1 expression was also significantly higher in colorectal cancer tissues from TCGA data sets and was associated with worse prognosis in the R2 database. FOXA1 expression was negatively correlated with the extent of its methylation, and its knockdown reduced proliferation, migration, and invasion, and induced G2/M phase arrest in HCT116 and SW480 cells by suppressing the phosphatase and tensin homolog/Akt signaling pathway and inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition. CONCLUSION: FOXA1 may act as an oncogene in colon cancer tumorigenesis and development.

Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio effectively predicts survival outcome of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC) is always accompanied by severe complications, and the optimal strategy for patients with OCC remains undetermined. Different from emergency surgery (ES), self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS), could increase the likelihood of primary anastomosis. However, the stent failure and related complications might give rise to a high recurrence rate. Few studies have focused on the indications for either method, and the relationship between preoperative inflammation indexes and the prognosis of OCC is still underestimated. AIM: To explore the indications for ES and BTS in OCCs based on preoperative inflammation indexes. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent ES or BTS from 2008 to 2015 were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define the optimal preoperative inflammation index and its cutoff point. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the association between the preoperative inflammation indexes and the survival outcomes [overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. Stratification analysis was performed to identify the subgroups that would benefit from ES or BTS. RESULTS: OS and DFS were comparable between the ES and BTS groups (P > 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as the optimal biomarker for the prediction of DFS in ES (P < 0.05). Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was recommended for BTS with regard to OS and DFS (P < 0.05). dNLR was related to stoma construction (P = 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.054), and DFS (P = 0.009) in ES. LMR was closely related to lymph node invasion (LVI) (P = 0.009), OS (P = 0.020), and DFS (P = 0.046) in the BTS group. dNLR was an independent risk factor for ES in both OS (P = 0.032) and DFS (P = 0.016). LMR affected OS (P = 0.053) and DFS (P = 0.052) in the BTS group. LMR could differentiate the OS between the ES and BTS groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preoperative dNLR and LMR could predict OS and DFS in patients undergoing ES and BTS, respectively. For OCC, as the potential benefit group, patients with a low LMR might be preferred for BTS via SEMS insertion.

Do Self-Expanding Metal Stents as a Bridge to Surgery Benefit All Patients with Obstructive Left-Side Colorectal Cancers?

BACKGROUND: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have been increasingly used in patients with obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer (OLCC); however, stent-specific complications (e.g., perforations) might worsen the long-term survival outcome. Strict indication needed to be identified to confirm the benefit subgroups. This study was designed to explore the indication for emergency surgery (ES) and SEMS in patients with OLCC and to suggest optimal strategies for individuals. METHODS: After propensity score matching, 36 pairs were included. Perioperative and long-term survival outcomes (3-year overall survival (OS) and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS)) were compared between the ES and SEMS groups. Independent risk factors were evaluated among subgroups. Stratification survival analysis was performed to identify subgroups that would benefit from SEMS placement or ES. RESULTS: The perioperative outcomes were similar between the SEMS and ES groups. The 3-year OS was comparable between the SEMS (73.5%) and ES (60.0%) groups, and the 3-year DFS in the SEMS group (69.7%) was similar to that in the ES group (57.1%). The pT stage was an independent risk factor for 3-year DFS (p = 0.014) and 3-year OS (p = 0.010) in the SEMS group. The comorbidity status (p = 0.049) independently affected 3-year DFS in the ES group. The 3-year OS rate was influenced by the cM stage (p = 0.003). Patients with non-pT4 stages in the SEMS group showed obviously better 3-year OS (95.0%) than the other subgroups. The 3-year OS rate was 36.4% in the ES group when patients had a worse comorbidity status than their counterparts. CONCLUSION: SEMS might be preferred for patients of obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer in the "high-operative risk group" with existing comorbidities or those without locally advanced invasion, such as the non-pT4-stage status.

Investigation of treatment methods in obstructive colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the treatment strategies for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer at different sites. METHODS: Treatment strategies were adopted according to the location of colorectal cancer and the condition of the patients when they were admitted to the hospital. Among a total of 134 patients, 29 patients were subjected to stent placement to relieve the obstruction before undergoing colorectal resection, 15 patients underwent per anum ileus catheterization to alleviate the symptoms of obstruction and waited for removal of the tumor within a limited time; 39 underwent intraoperative colonic lavage and colon resection with anastomosis and the remaining 51 patients were subjected to emergency surgery due to strangulation of the bowel, perforation, septic shock or other conditions before surgery. RESULTS: Stent placement was successfully performed on 23 patients, with a success rate of 79%. Ninety-five of 134 patients (71% had stage I anastomosis and only one case had anastomotic fistula. Infection of incision happened in 9 (7%) cases and 2 (1.5%) patients died of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized treatment for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer can lead to tumor resection and stage I anastomosis, thereby avoiding the suffering of second-stage surgery or colostomy.

Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) and conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (3-port LA) for appendectomy. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Springer link, and the Cochrane library databases up to April, 2014, for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were pooled by weighted mean differences (WMDs) or odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We found 11 RCTs, with a collective total of 731 patients treated with SILA and 725 patients treated with 3-point LA. Results indicated no significant differences between SILA and 3-port LA in primary outcomes, including wound infection, intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus, and total postoperative complications, and some secondary outcomes, including postoperative pain scores and length of hospital stay. However, SILA was associated with significantly longer operative times (WMD = 6.78, 95% CI = 3.78-9.79, P < 0.00001) and higher doses of analgesia (WMD = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.45-1.47, P = 0.0002) than the 3-port LA. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in the safety of SILA vs. that of 3-port LA, our findings do not support the application of SILA because of its significantly longer operative times and the higher doses of analgesia required compared with those for 3-point LA.