Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
Curr Dermatol Rep ; 7(4): 350-358, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30524911

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic wounds are a tremendous burden on the healthcare system and lead to significant patient morbidity and mortality. Normal cutaneous wound healing occurs through an intricate and delicate interplay between the immune system, keratinocytes, and dermal cells. Each cell type contributes signals that drive the normal phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This paper reviews how various immunological cell types and signaling molecules influence the way wounds develop, persist, and heal. RECENT FINDINGS: Concurrent with the achievement of hemostasis, neutrophils are the first cells to migrate to the wound bed, brought in by pro-inflammatory signals including IL-8. Their apoptosis and engulfment by macrophages (efferocytosis) provides a key signal to the local immune milieu, including macrophages, to transition to an anti-inflammatory, pro-repair state, where angiogenesis occurs and granulation tissue is laid down. Myofibroblasts, activated through contractile forces and signaling molecules, then drive remodeling, where granulation tissue becomes scar. Unchecked inflammation at this stage can result in abnormal scar formation. SUMMARY: Although the derangement of immune signals at any stage can result in impaired wound healing, recent research has shown that the key transition point lies between the inflammatory and the proliferative phases. This review summarizes the events that facilitate this transition and discusses how this process can be disrupted, leading to chronic, non-healing wounds.

3.
Cutis ; 101(1): 57-60, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529105

ABSTRACT

The use of biologic medications has represented a great advancement in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and has improved patients' quality of life. Despite the increasing popularity of biologics, their neurological side effects have been a constant concern. Reports of demyelinating diseases associated with tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors continue to accumulate. Additionally, efalizumab was withdrawn from the market in 2009 for causing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). These reports highlight the need for dermatologists to inform patients of the risks and promote informed decision-making with patients prior to starting a biologic agent. Dermatologists also need to recognize early manifestations of neurologic side effects. This review provides an overview of the literature on neurologic diseases that have been found to be associated with biologic agents used for plaque psoriasis. Clinical presentations and diagnostic workups of such diseases are given to aid dermatologists in their early diagnosis and referral.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/administration & dosage , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/etiology , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/adverse effects , Biological Therapy/methods , Decision Making , Dermatologists/organization & administration , Humans , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/physiopathology , Physician's Role , Psoriasis/pathology , Quality of Life , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
4.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 29(6): 586-592, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29334280

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare and contrast evidence-based CPGs from leading dermatological organizations for the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in psoriasis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guidelines from the British National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF), and the Canadian Dermatology Association (CDA) were reviewed and compared. RESULTS: Various guidelines are similar regarding treatment initiation but have significant differences regarding topics such as continuous versus intermittent therapy, use in erythrodermic and pustular palmoplantar psoriasis and special patient populations. CONCLUSION: TNF inhibitors remain valuable tools in psoriasis therapy, and guidelines for their use may help clinicians use them effectively.


Subject(s)
Psoriasis/drug therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Canada , Europe , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Psoriasis/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , United Kingdom , United States
7.
Dermatitis ; 26(5): 216-23, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26177034

ABSTRACT

Although a significant number of nickel dermatitis cases are seen clinically, most cases are neither patch-tested nor captured in the literature, allowing for a prospering hidden nickel epidemic. We present a qualitative review utilizing the public medical library of peer-reviewed US adult nickel dermatitis cases with the goal of identifying regional variations and trends. Between 1962 and 2015, 18,251 adult patients were reported to be sensitized to nickel. The number of articles has exponentially increased over the past 5.5 decades as 4.3% of total cases were reported between the 1960s and 1990s, 31.3% between 2000 and 2009, and 64.3% were reported between 2010 and 2015. Geographically, 27 US states have had at least 1 reported case of adult nickel dermatitis. Rising rates of US nickel dermatitis noted in our findings further highlight the need for medical professionals, legislators, and manufacturers to advocate for regulation of nickel-containing items.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Nickel/adverse effects , Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/etiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...