Intragastric Balloon Improves Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis.

Obesity is a major risk factor for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Although weight loss has been shown to reverse histologic features of NASH, lifestyle intervention alone is often challenging and unfeasible. In this case report, we discuss the effects of intragastric balloon (IGB) therapy on steatosis, fibrosis, and portal pressures. We also demonstrate that improvement in histologic features persist at least 6 months after IGB removal. Although there are little data thus far to support IGB therapy in the treatment of NASH, our case provides evidence of the potential benefit of IGB on improving metabolic parameters and markers of liver fibrosis.

Serious and Opportunistic Infections in Elderly Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often treated with biologics and immunomodulators, which can place elderly IBD patients at risk for serious and opportunistic infections. This article provides an updated account of research on therapies in IBD that are associated with an increased infection risk. Relevant serious and opportunistic infections in the elderly population are discussed along with methods for prevention and treatment. The incidence of infection increases with age and the degree of immunosuppression. Emphasis should be placed on performing vaccinations at the time of IBD diagnosis. Additionally, patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy should avoid live vaccines. Physicians should have a greater awareness of the increased risk of infection in elderly adults and the need for screening for infection prior to initiation of immunosuppressive IBD therapies.

The obesity paradox in patients with severe soft tissue infections.

BACKGROUND: The "obesity paradox" has been demonstrated in chronic diseases but not in acute surgery. We sought to determine whether obesity is associated with improved outcomes in patients with severe soft tissue infections (SSTIs). METHODS: The 2006 to 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify adult patients with SSTIs. Patients were categorized into nonobese and obese (nonmorbid [body mass index 30 to 39.9] and morbid [body mass index ≥ 40]). Logistic regression provided risk-adjusted association between obesity categories and inhospital mortality. RESULTS: There were 2,868 records with SSTI weighted to represent 14,080 patients. Obese patients were less likely to die in hospital than nonobese patients (odds ratio [OR] = .42; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25 to .70; P = .001). Subanalysis revealed a similar trend, with lower odds of mortality in nonmorbid obesity (OR = .46; 95% CI, .23 to .91; P = .025) and morbid obesity (OR = .39; 95% CI, .19 to .80; P = .011) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is independently associated with reduced inhospital mortality in patients with SSTI regardless of the obesity classification. This suggests that the obesity paradox exists in this acute surgical population.

Postdischarge complications following nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury.

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management (NOM) is the standard of care in majority of blunt splenic injuries. However, little is known about the postdischarge complications. METHODS: Patients admitted for blunt splenic injury were identified in the California State Inpatient Database (2007 to 2011). We examined patterns and risk factors for postdischarge complications among these patients. RESULTS: In total, 2,704 (61.45%) patients had NOM without splenic artery embolization (SAE) and 257 (5.84%) had NOM with adjunct SAE. Thirty-day readmission rate was higher in those who had adjunct SAE (12.84% vs 7.36%, P = .002). Subsequent operations during readmission were seen in 18.10% of readmitted patients and 38.10% of all patients were readmitted at nonindex hospitals. Major diagnoses on readmission were spleen injury (36.2%) and respiratory complications (9.05%). Adjunct SAE was an independent risk factor for readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.82, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 2.78). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one fifth of readmitted patients initially managed nonoperatively required an operative intervention. Improving predischarge assessments and postdischarge follow-up may reduce readmissions among these patients.

Practice patterns in high-risk bariatric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: In the morbidly obese population that undergoes bariatric surgery, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Certain factors place a patient at higher risk for VTE. No consensus exists on VTE screening or prophylaxis for the high-risk patient. This report describes the results of a survey on VTE screening and prophylaxis patterns in high-risk bariatric surgery. METHODS: Members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) were queried on factors that identified bariatric patients as high risk for VTE and on routine screening and prophylaxis practices. This included mechanical and chemical prophylaxis, duration of therapy, and use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. RESULTS: Of the 385 surgeons who responded to the survey, 81 % were bariatric surgeons, and the majority managed more than 50 cases annually. One or more of the following risk factors qualified patients as high risk: history of VTE, hypercoagulable status, body mass index (BMI) exceeding 55 kg/m(2), partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO(2)) lower than 60 mmHg, and severe immobility. Preoperative screening of patients for VTE was practiced routinely by 56 % of the surgeons, and 92.4 % used preoperative chemoprophylaxis. The most common agent used preoperatively was heparin (48 %), and Lovenox was most commonly used postoperatively (49 %). Whereas 48 % of the patients discontinued chemoprophylaxis at discharge, 43 % continued chemoprophylaxis as outpatients, and 47 % routinely screened for VTE postoperatively. Use of IVC filters was routine for 28 % of the patients, who most commonly removed them after 1-3 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes current practice patterns of VTE screening and prophylaxis in high-risk bariatric surgery. Nearly all surgeons agree on risk factors that qualify patients as high risk, but only half routinely screen patients preoperatively. Preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis is used by nearly all surgeons, but the duration of therapy varies. Use of IVC filters is not routine, and postoperative screening was performed by less than half of the respondents. An understanding of current practice patterns yields insight into the rates of VTE and shows variability in the need for evidence-based prophylaxis and standardized screening.

Effect of head position and surgical dissection on sinus irrigant penetration in cadavers.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment for recalcitrant rhinosinusitis requires unobstructed surgical marsupialization of sinus cavities and use of delivery systems that will topically penetrate the sinuses. AIMS: To determine the extent of sinus penetration achieved with nasal irrigation by varying the ostial size and head position. METHODS: Ten thawed fresh-frozen cadaver heads were dissected in a staged manner. After each stage of dissection, sinus squeeze-bottle irrigations were performed in three head positions, and endoscopes placed via external ports into the sinus cavities viewed the sinus ostia. An ordinal scale was developed to grade ostial penetration of irrigations. Three reviewers independently graded the outcomes. RESULTS: Irrigant entry into sinuses increased with ostial size (P < .001) and the greatest differential of improvement in sinus penetration is obtained at an ostial size of 4.7 mm. Stages 2 and 3 (larger sinus ostia) of maxillary and sphenoid dissections have statistically greater irrigant penetration relative to earlier stages. Frontal sinus irrigation is worse in vertex to ceiling head position. There does not appear to be any significant advantage to head position with maxillary and sphenoid sinuses. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the larger the sinus ostium, the better the penetration of irrigant into the sinus, with an ostium of at least 4.7 mm allowing maximal penetration in the maxillary and sphenoid sinuses. The same benefit was not noted in the frontal sinus. Head position was only relevant to the frontal sinus where less penetration was seen with the head neutral (vertex to ceiling) position when compared to forward angled positions.