Titanium mesh cranioplasty in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy: Appropriate timing for pre-schoolers and early school age children.

PURPOSE: There is little knowledge on the growth of cranial defects, appropriate timing and outcomes of application of titanium mesh for cranioplasty in the pediatric population, especially pre-school age (2-5 years old) and school age (6-12 years old) children. We hypothesised that cranioplasty for pre-schoolers could be delayed to school age due to the expected cranium growth, whereas, for the school age group, it is better to perform routine cranioplasty (3-6 months) to protect the brain and therefore ensure their timely return to school life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients (2-12 years old) who underwent titanium mesh cranioplasty for cranial defects from 2006 to 2012 was performed. Patient demographic data, radiological data, and clinical information were collected. Specifically, cranial defect sizes were evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of computed tomography data after craniectomy, before cranioplasty and 2-years after cranioplasty. Patients were routinely followed up at an outpatient clinic for complications and school attendance. RESULTS: A total of 18 titanium mesh cranioplasties were performed in 18 patients. The average interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty was 3 years for pre-schoolers and 4 months for the school age group. Patients in the pre-schooler group showed significant enlargements in cranial defects during the interval as compared with the school age group (26% vs. 4%, P < 0.05). There were no surgery-related complications except in one patient, who had titanium mesh exposure 11 months later. Two years after cranioplasty, there was no significant difference in mild cranial defect enlargements between the two groups (11% vs. 6%, P > 0.05). Patients were followed for an average of 5 (range, 2-8) years. All patients had satisfactory recovery of cranial contour, sufficient protection of the brain and active participation in school study. All patients had satisfactory recovery of cranial contour, sufficient protection of the brain and active participation in school. CONCLUSION: Timing of titanium mesh cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy based on their age is a workable solution for school-age pediatric patients. The enlargement of cranium defects in pre-schoolers supports a delayed repair until school age. The long-term outcomes for these patients with titanium mesh cranioplasty are favourable.

Trephination mini-craniectomy for traumatic posterior fossa epidural hematomas in selected pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: Posterior fossa epidural hematomas (PFEDH) are uncommon in children but usually require timely surgical intervention due to the risk of life-threatening brainstem compression. We attempt to make the surgical procedure less invasive by treating selected pediatric patients with trephination mini-craniectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses, radiological findings, surgical procedures, and prognoses of the pediatric patients who were treated in our departments for traumatic PFEDH from January 2010 to January 2015. RESULTS: During this period, a total of 17 patients were surgically treated for PFEDH and 7 were managed with trephination mini-craniectomy for hematoma evacuation. The outcomes were good in all 7 patients as evaluated with Glasgow Outcome Score. There was no mortality in this series. The on average 30-month clinical follow-up showed that patients experienced satisfactory recoveries without complications. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that trephination mini-craniectomy is a safe surgical technique for selected PFEDH patients with moderate hematoma volume and stabilized neurological functions. However, standard craniectomy is recommend when there are rapid deteriorations in patients' neurological functions or the hematomas are large and exerted severe mass effects.

Traumatic open depressed cranial fracture causing occlusion of posterior superior sagittal sinus: Case report.

RATIONALE: The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is the major dural sinuses that receive a considerable amount of venous drainage. Interruption of its posterior third has been suggested to cause intracranial hypertension and lead to potentially fatal consequences. PATIENT CONCERNS: We presented a 22-year-old man with a severe headache and scalp bleeding after a head chop wound. Physical examination identified a 20-cm straight laceration in his parietooccipital scalp. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a depressed cranial fracture (DCF) in the left parietooccipital bone, a fracture line across the midline to the right side, and penetrations of bone fragments into the brain parenchyma. DIAGNOSES: Traumatic open DCF in left parietooccipital bone. INTERVENTIONS: An emergent left parietooccipital craniotomy, followed by cranioplasty to restore the depressed bone flap, was delivered to the patient. Postoperative CT confirmed successful elevation of the DCF and removal of intracerebral bone fragments. However, postoperative CT angiography (CTA) demonstrated an absence of venous flow distal to the fracture, suggesting occlusion of the posterior third of SSS. MRV revealed a persistent absence of venous flow in the posterior third of SSS with dilated cortical venous drainage. Anticoagulation treatment was initiated 3 days after surgery, and follow-up CTA and digital subtraction angiography showed gradually improved patency in the anterior and middle two-thirds of SSS. OUTCOMES: Despite occlusion of the posterior third of SSS, patient's symptoms resolved after the operation and he was discharged without complications. LESSONS: The favorable clinical outcome after complete occlusion of the posterior third of the SSS has rarely been reported and it might be explained by our timely surgical intervention and development of compensatory cerebral collateral circulation.

Delayed surgical repair of cranial burst fracture without strict dura closure: a prudent choice in selected patients?

OBJECTIVES: Surgical management of cranial burst fracture (CBF) usually involves craniotomy to remove the devitalized brain tissues, followed by watertight repair of dural tears. However, there were times when the dural tear was so extensive that a substantially large bone flap would have to be removed in order to expose the retracted dural margins before it could be repaired. In such cases, strict dural repair would incur a significantly higher risk of damages to the surrounding neural tissues and severe bleeding, especially when the fracture was in the vicinity of eloquent cortical areas and sinus. Basing on our own clinical experiences, we suggest strict dural closure is not mandatory for these selected patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranial surgery for CBF at our hospital was performed. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed to evaluate the extent of dural and brain laceration and the existence of extra-cranial cerebral tissues. Routine craniotomy was delivered to remove the lacerated brain tissues and evacuate the hematoma. The dural defect was only partially fixed with patient's own tissues or artificial dura patch. Then the fractured bone flaps were restored using titanium micro plates and screws. Data including preoperative neurological status, surgery related complications, postoperative cranial fracture healing, and clinical outcomes were obtained through clinical and radiological examinations. RESULTS: From October 2004 to March 2013, a total of four patients diagnosed with CBF were treated by this dural closure sparing technique. Their average age was 18.4 months old and the average area of the skull defects was 91 cm(2), with an average interval between primary injury and surgery of 13 days. The diagnosis of CBF was confirmed by intraoperative findings like extrusion of cerebral tissues out of the lacerated dura mater and skull defects. The postoperative courses were uneventful and all patients' neurological functions improved after surgery. Postoperative three dimensional CT reconstruction of the cranial vault showed the skull fractures healed properly in all patients. No patient developed posttraumatic cerebrospinal fluid leak or epilepsy during the on average 24-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In those selected cases of CBF in whom an extraordinary large craniotomy would be required to expose the entire retracted dura margins, given satisfactory evacuation of devitalized brain tissues and restoration of the bone flaps were achieved, we suggest strict dura closure is not compulsory.

Modified external ventricular drainage in pediatric tuberculous meningitis: is it possible to avoid ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement?

OBJECTIVE: Ventriculoperitoneal shunting is the current mainstay of treatment for children with tuberculous meningitis with hydrocephalus. However, ventriculoperitoneal shunting is highly associated with complications, and more importantly, long-term, indwelling shunt devices may adversely affect children's spirits and psychological health. Therefore, there is clearly a need to explore methods of CSF diversion to avoid ventriculoperitoneal shunting. METHODS: We studied 6 cases of children with tuberculous meningitis with hydrocephalus in whom external drainage from the ventricle to the subcutaneous abdomen was adopted. Outcomes were assessed over a 6- to 9-month follow-up period based on improvements in radiological features, such as ventricular morphology, as well as the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and any complications. RESULTS: The drainage tubes were removed in 4 cases 4-6 months after the modified external ventricular drainage surgery, and 2 patients went on to receive a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. All patients' CSF protein and cell counts returned to normal, and imaging showed improved ventricular morphology and no intracranial secondary infection. CONCLUSION: In our preliminary study, the modified ventricular drainage device can produce satisfactory outcomes and relatively safe effects and may help some patients to avoid ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement.