Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
World J Orthod ; 8(2): 136-44, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17580507

ABSTRACT

Miniscrew placement has achieved widespread acceptance in orthodontic practice. However, selecting a suitable miniscrew system from among the available brands is not easy. The aim of this article is to help the clinician better understand the features of miniscrew systems currently available on the market and provide a useful guideline for their clinical use. The authors find that the ideal miniscrew design should include biocompatibility, bone-density-guided insertion, immediate loading, and compatibility with modern orthodontic accessories for 3-dimensional orthodontic control.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws/standards , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/standards , Orthodontic Appliance Design/standards , Orthodontics, Corrective/instrumentation , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Alloys , Dental Materials/chemistry , Humans , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/instrumentation , Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures/methods , Time Factors , Titanium/chemistry , Weight-Bearing
3.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 126(1): 42-7, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15224057

ABSTRACT

Miniscrews have been used in recent years for anchorage in orthodontic treatment. However, it is not clear whether the miniscrews are absolutely stationary or move when force is applied. Sixteen adult patients with miniscrews (diameter = 2 mm, length = 17 mm) as the maxillary anchorage were included in this study. Miniscrews were inserted on the maxillary zygomatic buttress as a direct anchorage for en masse anterior retraction. Nickel-titanium closed-coil springs were placed for the retraction 2 weeks after insertion of the miniscrews. Cephalometric radiographs were taken immediately before force application (T1) and 9 months later (T2). The cephalometric tracings at T1 and T2 were superimposed for the overall best fit on the structures of the maxilla, cranial base, and cranial vault to determine any movement of the miniscrews. The miniscrews were also evaluated clinically for their mobility (0: no movement, 1: < or =0.5 mm, 2: 0.5-1.0 mm, 3: >1.0 mm). The mobility of all miniscrews was 0 at T1 and T2. On average, the miniscrews tipped forward significantly, by 0.4 mm at the screw head. The miniscrews were extruded and tipped forward (-1.0 to 1.5 mm) in 7 of the 16 patients. Miniscrews are a stable anchorage but do not remain absolutely stationary throughout orthodontic loading. They might move according to the orthodontic loading in some patients. To prevent miniscrews hitting any vital organs because of displacement, it is recommended that they be placed in a non-tooth-bearing area that has no foramen, major nerves, or blood vessel pathways, or in a tooth-bearing area allowing 2 mm of safety clearance between the miniscrew and dental root.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Dental Abutments , Dental Stress Analysis , Malocclusion/therapy , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Tooth Movement Techniques/instrumentation , Adult , Cephalometry , Dental Implantation/instrumentation , Dental Implantation/methods , Dental Implants , Female , Humans , Maxilla , Miniaturization , Orthodontic Appliances , Zygoma/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...