Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
4.
PLoS One ; 6(3): e18227, 2011 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21479272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have provided new insights into the association between psoriasis and cardiovascular diseases. Previous population studies have examined hypertension frequency in psoriasis patients. However, the relationship between severity of hypertension and psoriasis has not been characterized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether patients with psoriasis have more difficult-to-manage hypertension compared to non-psoriatic hypertensive patients. APPROACH: We performed a case-control study using the University of California Davis electronic medical records. The cases were defined as patients diagnosed with both psoriasis and hypertension, and controls were defined as patients with hypertension and without psoriasis. In this identified population, 835 cases were matched on age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to 2418 control patients. KEY RESULTS: Treatment with multiple anti-hypertensives was significantly associated with the presence of psoriasis using univariate (p < 0.0001) and multivariable analysis, after adjusting for diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and race (p < 0.0001). Compared to hypertensive patients without psoriasis, psoriasis patients with hypertension were 5 times more likely to be on a monotherapy antihypertensive regimen (95% CI 3.607.05), 9.5 times more likely to be on dual antihypertensive therapy (95% CI 6.68-13.65), 16.5 times more likely to be on triple antihypertensive regimen (95% CI 11.01-24.84), and 19.9 times more likely to be on quadruple therapy or centrally-acting agent (95% CI 10.58-37.33) in multivariable analysis after adjusting for traditional cardiac risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Psoriasis patients appear to have more difficult-to-control hypertension compared to non-psoriatic, hypertensive patients.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/pathology , Psoriasis/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Case-Control Studies , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis
5.
Telemed J E Health ; 16(4): 424-38, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20438384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Store-and-forward (S&F) teledermatology has been used to increase patient access to dermatologic care. A major challenge to implementing S&F teledermatology is selecting secure and cost-saving applications for data capture and transmission. Detailed analyses and comparison of the major S&F teledermatology applications do not exist in the current peer-reviewed literature. The objectives of this study were to identify, evaluate, and compare the major S&F teledermatology applications in the United States to help referral and consultant sites select applications responsive to their needs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified four major, commercially available S&F teledermatology applications after surveying the members of the American Telemedicine Association Teledermatology Special Interest Group and the Telemedicine Task Force of the American Academy of Dermatology. A multidisciplinary team of dermatologists, primary care physicians, and information technologists established a set of criteria used to evaluate the applications. We performed a comparative analysis of the four major S&F teledermatology applications based on the predetermined evaluation criteria. RESULTS: The four major, commercially available S&F teledermatology applications evaluated in this study were Alaska Federal Health Care Access Network, Medweb, TeleDerm Solutions, and Second Opinion. All four teledermatology applications were mature and capable of addressing the basic needs of S&F teledermatology referrals and consultations. Each application adopts different approaches to organize medical information and facilitate consultations. Areas in need of improvement common to these major applications include (1) increased compatibility and integration with established electronic medical record systems, (2) development of fully integrated billing capability, (3) simplifying user interface and allowing user-designed templates to communicate recommendations and patient education, and (4) reducing the cost of the applications. CONCLUSION: The four major S&F teledermatology applications in the United States are versatile applications capable of facilitating communication between referral and consultant sites. Continued efforts in making these applications more secure, robust, user-friendly, and affordable will contribute to wider implementation of S&F teledermatology.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Internet , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Software , Telemedicine/instrumentation , California , Computer Storage Devices , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Dermatology , Humans , Medical Laboratory Science , Telemedicine/organization & administration , United States , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...