ABSTRACT
Previous studies have shown that Wnt signaling is involved in postnatal mammalian myogenesis; however, the downstream mechanism of Wnt signaling is not fully understood. This study reports that the murine four-and-a-half LIM domain 1 (Fhl1) could be stimulated by ß-catenin or LiCl treatment to induce myogenesis. In contrast, knockdown of the Fhl1 gene expression in C2C12 cells led to reduced myotube formation. We also adopted reporter assays to demonstrate that either ß-catenin or LiCl significantly activated the Fhl1 promoter, which contains four putative consensus TCF/LEF binding sites. Mutations of two of these sites caused a significant decrease in promoter activity by luciferase reporter assay. Thus, we suggest that Wnt signaling induces muscle cell differentiation, at least partly, through Fhl1 activation.
Subject(s)
Cell Differentiation , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , LIM Domain Proteins/metabolism , Muscle Proteins/metabolism , Wnt Signaling Pathway , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Nucleus/physiology , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Genes, Reporter , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , LIM Domain Proteins/genetics , Luciferases/biosynthesis , Luciferases/genetics , Mice , Muscle Development , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/metabolism , Muscle Fibers, Skeletal/physiology , Muscle Proteins/genetics , Myogenin/genetics , Myogenin/metabolism , Myosin Heavy Chains/genetics , Myosin Heavy Chains/metabolism , Promoter Regions, Genetic , RNA Interference , Recombinant Proteins/biosynthesis , Transcription, Genetic , Up-Regulation , beta Catenin/biosynthesisABSTRACT
Expression of exogenous DNA in vitro is significantly affected by the particular transfection method utilized. In this study, we evaluated the efficiency of two transfection methods, chemically mediated polyethyleneimine (PEI) treatment and physically mediated electroporation, on a rat heart myoblast cell line, H9c2(2-1). After PEI transfection of pPgk-1/EGFP into H9c2(2-1) cells, EGFP expression could be easily detected by fluorospectrometer after 48 h (210 ± 12 RFU) and continued to increase after 72 h (243 ± 14 RFU). However, when H9c2(2-1) cells were transfected by electroporation (200 V, 500 µF, and one pulse), low level EGFP expression was observed after 48 h (49 ± 4 RFU) or 72 h (21 ± 14 RFU). In contrast, the easily transfectable control CHO-K1 cell line displayed a stronger EGFP expression than the H9c2(2-1) cells either by PEI or electroporation transfection. When transfection efficiencies were assayed by flow cytometry after 72 h, 13.6 ± 2.2% of PEI and 10.1 ± 1.5% of electroporation (250 V, 500 µF, and two pulses) transfected cells of H9c2(2-1) expressed EGFP, and PEI-transfected cells appeared to be less damaged (viability 93.6%) as compared to electroporation-transfected cells (39.5%). However, both PEI and electroporation (580 V, 50 Ω, and 50 µF) were effective for transfection of CHO-K1 with a higher efficiency, cell viability, and EGFP expression than H9c2(2-1). Our results indicate that the transfection efficiency of different methods varies among cell lines and that PEI is more efficient than electropolation for transfection of H9c2(2-1) whereas both PEI and electroporation are suitable for CHO-K1 transfection.
