Association between ERCC2 polymorphisms and glioma risk: a meta-analysis.

ERCC2 is an essential component of the nucleotide excision repair pathway which is involved in the effective maintenance of genome integrity. Association studies on ERCC2 polymorphisms and glioma risk have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis was performed to gain a better insight into the relationship between ERCC2 polymorphisms and glioma risk. A systematic literature search updated to December 2, 2013 was performed in the Pubmed and EMBASE databases. Crude pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the association between ERCC2 polymorphisms and glioma risk under a suitable effect model according to heterogeneity. All analyses were performed using Review Manager 5 (version 5.2) and STATA (version 12.0). The combined results demonstrated rs13181 to be significantly associated with glioma risk (G allele versus T allele: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.05-1.26, P=0.002; dominant model: OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.07-1.39, P=0.002; recessive model: OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.98-1.41, P=0.070). We also found that rs13181 acts in an allele dose-dependent manner (GG versus TT: OR=1.30, 95% CI=1.07-1.57, P=0.009; TG versus TT: OR=1.20, 95%=CI 1.05-1.37, P=0.009; trend test, P=0.004). However, no evidence was found in analyses for the association between other 3 ERCC2 polymorphisms (rs238406, rs1799793, and rs1052555) and susceptibility to glioma development. Our meta-analysis suggests that rs13181 is significantly associated with glioma risk in an allele dose-dependent manner, whereas, 3 other ERCC2 polymorphisms (rs238406, rs1799793, and rs1052555) may have no influence.

[Inhibitory effect of photodynamic therapy combined with paclitaxel on the proliferation of esophageal carcinoma Eca-109 cells].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inhibitory effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in combination with paclitaxel (PCT) on proliferation in esophageal carcinoma Eca-109 cells line. METHODS: Eca-109 cells were treated with PCT alone, HPD alone at different doses, or their combinations. For the combined treatments, the cells were exposed to PCT for 12 h followed by incubation with HPD at high, middle or low concentrations for 4 h. PDT was then performed on these treated cells and fluorescence microscopic observation was made before and after PDT. The cell survival was measured by MTT assay, and the cell apoptosis rate analyzed by flow cytometry after a 24-h cell incubation following PDT. RESULTS: The fluorescence excitation of the cells was weakened after PDT. Combined treatments resulted in significantly lowered cell survival rate and increased cell apoptosis rates as compared to those of the control cells and the cells treated with PCT alone and low-dose HPD (P<0.01). Significant differences were also noted among the cells exposed to HPD at different concentrations (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: PDT combined with PCT have significant synergetic effects in inhibiting the proliferation of human esophageal carcinoma cells and inducing their apoptosis in vitro.