Effect of pharmacological treatment on outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment strategies for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain uncertain. The goal of this study was to compare the treatment effects of different therapeutic agents for patients with HFpEF. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before June 2022 were searched from PubMed, Clinical Trials gov, and the Cochrane Central Register databases. Combined odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the primary and secondary outcomes. All-cause death was the primary endpoint and cardiac death, hospitalization for HF, and worsening HF (WHF) events were secondary endpoints in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs including 31,608 patients were included in this meta-analysis. All-cause and cardiac death were not significantly correlated between drug treatments and placebo. Compared with placebo, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors significantly reduced HF hospitalizations [odds ratio (OR) = 0.64, (95% confidence interval (95%CI 0.43 - 0.96), OR = 0.73, (95%CI 0.61 - 0.86), and OR = 0.74, (95%CI 0.66 - 0.83), respectively] without heterogeneity among studies. Only SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced WHF events [OR = 0.75, (95%CI 0.67 - 0.83)]. CONCLUSIONS: No treatments were effective in reducing mortality, but ARNIs, ACEIs or SGLT2 inhibitors reduced HF hospitalizations and only SGLT2 inhibitors reduced WHF events for patients with HFpEF.

Comparative efficacy and safety of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy in patients with chronic coronary syndromes after percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different antiplatelet or anticoagulation strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Randomized controlled trials comparing different antiplatelet or anticoagulant strategies in patients with CCS after PCI were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), mortality, ischemic and bleeding events. Compared to aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel or ticagrelor to aspirin resulted in lower risk of myocardial infarction (MI) [odds ratio (OR): 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.62); 0.810-0.84 (0.69-0.98)] and any stroke [0.56 (0.42-0.75)] at the expense of increased risk of major bleeding [1.79 (1.34-2.39); 2.08-2.38 (1.56-3.28)], whereas, clopidogrel monotherapy reduced the risk of any stroke, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. On subgroup analysis, compared with aspirin alone, addition of prasugrel resulted in lower MACE [0.72 (0.60-0.86)], MI [0.48 (0.38-0.62)], and stent thrombosis [0.29 (0.09-0.91)], whereas, addition of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg resulted in lower risk of MACE [0.72 (0.60-0.87)], cardiac death [0.71 (0.52-0.98)] and any stroke [0.65 (0.45-0.95)], but not reduced MI. Both prasugrel and rivaroxaban 2.5 mg increased major bleeding [1.79 (1.34-2.39); 1.72 (1.33-2.22)]. Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with lower MACE [0.72 (0.58-0.90)], any stroke [0.42 (0.24-0.73)], and major bleeding [0.62 (0.40-0.96)]. Adding prasugrel or ticagrelor led to a reduced incidence of MI and prasugrel was also found to reduce the risk of MACE and stent thrombosis in CCS patients with low risk of bleeding after PCI. Clopidogrel monotherapy has advantage in reducing MACE, stroke, and major bleeding events in CCS patients at high risk of bleeding after PCI. Systematic Review Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, PROSPERO Identifier: CRD 42021291050.

Retrograde recanalization of radial artery occlusion via the distal transradial artery: A single-center experience.

Background: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) often occurs after catheterization when using a transradial artery approach. Objective: This prospective study assessed the success and feasibility of accessing the distal transradial artery (dTRA) for retrograde recanalization of RAO. Methods: From June 2019 to December 2021, 44 consecutive patients who had undergone cardiac catheterization resulting in RAO were given retrograde recanalization via the dTRA. According to the result of the procedure (primary endpoint), patients' cases were analyzed as successful or failed. Rates of post-operative patency and adverse events were calculated up to 12 months. Results: The procedural success rate was 88.6%. Compared with the successful group, a significantly higher percentage of patients in the failed group were current smokers and/or suffered from diabetes mellitus (each, 80.0% cf. 33.3%, P = 0.046); had undergone at least 3 previous cardiac catheterizations (60.0% cf. 12.8%, P = 0.011), lower rate of anticoagulation (30.77% cf. 0%, P = 0.048) and exhibited chronic total occlusion (100.0% cf. 51.28%, P = 0.041). In each group, one patient each had minor bleeding at the access site and hematoma. The patency rates in the successful group at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months were 48.7, 43.6, and 35.9%, respectively. Conclusion: The dTRA approach for retrograde recanalization of RAO showed a high procedural success rate, but with patency rates of <50% at follow-up.

Renal Safety and Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients With Contrast Media Exposure: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study.

ABSTRACT: There is no clear consensus on the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients with contrast media exposure. We aimed to assess the safety of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors in patients exposed to contrast media at 1-year follow-up. Patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups (1:1 ratio): with ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB continued throughout the study period) and without ACEI/ARB group (ACEI/ARB stopped 24 hours before and continued 48 hours after the procedure). The primary endpoint was contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and the need for renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. The occurrence rates of CI-AKI were not comparable in the ACEI/ARB group and the without ACEI/ARB group (2.92% and 2.62%, respectively; P = 0.866). No significant between-group differences were found with respect to the frequency of MACEs or renal replacement therapy during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. On subgroup analysis, among patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was significantly higher in the ACEI/ARB group [17.95% (14/78) vs. 6.02% (5/83), P = 0.029]. Among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min, the incidence of CI-AKI was comparable in the 2 groups [0.87% (5/572) vs. 2.12% (12/567), P = 0.094]. The incidence of MACEs and renal replacement therapy was not comparable in the 2 groups, during hospitalization and at 1-year follow-up. ACEI or ARB treatment can safely be continued after exposure to contrast media, but not in patients with eGFR < 45 mL/min.

Risk Estimation for Infection in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Development and Validation of a Predictive Score.

Background: Infection during hospitalization is a serious complication among patients who suffered from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, there are no suitable and accurate means to assess risk. This study aimed to develop and validate a simple scoring system to predict post-AMI infection in such patients. Methods: All patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI consecutively enrolled from January 2010 to May 2016 were served as derivation cohort, and those from June 2016 to May 2018 as validation cohort, respectively. The primary endpoint was post-AMI infection during hospitalization, and all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were considered as secondary endpoints. The simplified risk model was established using logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating curve and calibration of predicted and observed infection risk were calculated. Results: A 24-point risk score was developed, with infection risk ranging from 0.7 to 99.6% for patients with the lowest and highest score. Seven variables including age, Killip classification, insulin use, white blood cell count, serum albumin, diuretic use, and transfemoral approach were included. This model achieved the same high discrimination in the development and validation cohort (C-statistic:0.851) and revealed adequate calibration in both datasets. The incidences of post-AMI infection increased steadily across risk score groups in both development (1.3, 5.1, 26.3, and 69.1%; P < 0.001) and validation (1.8, 5.9, 27.2, and 79.2%; P < 0.001) cohort. Moreover, the risk score demonstrated good performance for infection, in-hospital all-cause death, and MACE among these patients, as well as in patients with the non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Conclusion: This present risk score established a simple bedside tool to estimate the risk of developing infection and other in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing PCI. Clinicians can use this risk score to evaluate the infection risk and subsequently make evidence-based decisions.

Comparison of Pharmacological Treatment Effects on Long-Time Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Beneficial effects of therapeutic drugs are controversial for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the interactive effects of different therapeutic drugs and placebo in patients with HFpEF. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central Register to identify related articles published before March 2021. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and worsening HF events. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials, comprising 19,573 patients (intervention group, n = 9,954; control group, n = 9,619) were included in this network meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and worsening HF events among therapeutic drugs and placebo with follow-up of 0.5-4 years were not found to be significantly correlated. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) significantly reduced the HF hospitalizations compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.87 and HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96, respectively), without heterogeneity among studies. The ARNI was superior to angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in reducing HF hospitalizations (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71-0.91), and vericiguat 10 mg ranked worse than beta-blockers for reducing all-cause mortality in patients with HFpEF (HR 3.76, 95% CI 1.06-13.32). No therapeutic drugs can significantly reduce mortality, but the ARNI or ACEI is associated with the low risk of HF hospitalizations for patients with HFpEF. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021247034.

Intravenous morphine use in acute heart failure increases adverse outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Intravenous morphine is a controversial treatment for acute heart failure (AHF). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intravenous morphine treatment vs. no morphine treatment in AHF patients. Relevant research conducted before June 2020 was retrieved from electronic databases. One unpublished study of our own was also included. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they compared AHF patients treated with intravenous morphine and patients who did not receive morphine. This meta-analysis included three propensity-matched cohorts and two retrospective analyses, involving a total of 149,967 patients (intravenous-morphine group, n = 22,072; no-morphine group, n = 127,895). There was a non-significant increase in the in-hospital mortality in the morphine group (combined odds ratio [OR] = 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-5.23, p = 0.095, I2 = 97.1%). However, subgroup analyse showed that the rate of in-hospital mortality with odds of 1.41 times more likely (95% CI: 1.11-1.80, p = 0.005, I2 = 0%) in those receiving vs. not receiving intravenous morphine. No significant correlation was found between intravenous morphine and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.19, 95% CI: 0.84-5.73, p = 0.10, I2 = 94.2%; subgroup analysis: OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 0.70-7.21, p = 0.176, I2 = 95.1%) or long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.96-1.34, p = 0.335; I2 = 8.6%). The administration of intravenous morphine to patients with AHF may be related to in-hospital mortality, but not to invasive mechanical ventilation and long-term mortality.

Validity of SOFA score as a prognostic tool for critically ill elderly patients with acute infective endocarditis.

The prognostic value of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score for critically ill elderly patients with acute infective endocarditis (IE) remains unknown. From January 2015 to December 2019, 111 elderly (≥65 years) patients with acute IE were consecutively included and divided into a low SOFA (<6) group (n = 71) and a high SOFA (≥6) group (n = 40). Endpoints included in-hospital and long-term (12-36 month) mortality. A high SOFA score was related to higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (30.0%) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.796. In multivariate analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) = 2.21, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.16-6.79, p = 0.040], SOFA ≥6 (OR = 6.38, 95% CI, 1.80-16.89, p = 0.004) and surgical treatment (OR = 0.21, 95% CI, 0.05-0.80, p = 0.021) were predictive of in-hospital mortality. A Cox proportional-hazards model identified age [Hazard ratios (HR)= 2.85, 95% CI, 1.11-7.37, p = 0.031], diabetes mellitus (HR = 3.99, 95% CI, 1.35-11.80, p = 0.013), SOFA ≥6 (OR = 3.38, 95% CI, 1.26-9.08, p = 0.001) and surgical treatment (HR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.08-0.68, p = 0.021) as predictors of long-term mortality. A high SOFA score predicts a poor outcome including in-hospital and long-term mortality in critically ill elderly patients with acute IE.

C-Reactive Protein at Hospital Discharge and 1-Year Mortality in Acute Infective Endocarditis: A Prospective Observational Study.

Background: An accurate biomarker at hospital discharge is needed to identify patients with acute infective endocarditis (IE) who are at high risk of mortality. This prospective observational study evaluated the prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP). Methods: Patients with acute IE (n = 343) and hospitalized at 2 university-affiliated medical centers from January 2014 to December 2019 were enrolled. Patients were categorized as having low or high CRP (n = 217 and 126, respectively) at hospital discharge according to the optimal cutoff (CRP = 6.5 mg/L) determined via receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, from hospital discharge to 1 year. The secondary endpoint was the cumulative rate of rehospitalization or paravalvular abscess at 1 year. Results: At the 12-month follow-up, the mortality rate of the high-CRP group (21.43%) was significantly higher than that of the low-CRP group (2.76%, log-rank P < 0.0001). The multivariate regression analysis indicated that the high-CRP group had a higher excess mortality hazard risk (HR = 4.182; 95% CI: 2.120, 5.211; P < 0.001). The cumulative 1-year incidence of paravalvular abscess of the high-CRP group (11.90%) was significantly higher than that of the low-CRP (5.07%; P = 0.022). The cumulative rate of heart rehospitalizations of the 2 groups were similar (18.25% cf. 14.29%, P = 0.273). Conclusion: For hospitalized patients with acute IE, a high CRP at discharge suggests a poor prognosis for 1-year mortality and paravalvular abscess.

Impact of aspirin use on clinical outcomes in patients with vasospastic angina: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The use of aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease in vasospastic angina (VSA) patients without significant stenosis has yet to be investigated. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of aspirin use among VSA patients. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for relevant information prior to October 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Aspirin use versus no aspirin use (placebo or no treatment) among VSA patients without significant stenosis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators extracted the study data. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated and graphed as forest plots. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale tool and Begg's funnel plot were used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS: Four propensity-matched cohorts, one retrospective analysis and one prospective multicentre cohort, in total comprising 3661 patients (aspirin use group, n=1695; no aspirin use group, n=1966) were included in this meta-analysis. Aspirin use and the incidence of major cardiovascular adverse events with follow-up of 1-5 years were not significantly correlated (combined OR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.68, p=0.829, I2=82.2%; subgroup analysis: OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.47, I2=0%). No significant difference was found between aspirin use and the incidence of myocardial infarction (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.09 to 4.36, p=0.615, I2=73.8%) or cardiac death (OR=1.73, 95% CI: 0.61 to 4.94, p=0.444, I2=0%) during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Aspirin use may not reduce the risk of future cardiovascular events in VSA patients without significant stenosis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020214891.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting Post-acute Myocardial Infarction Infection in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Study Protocol for an Observational Study.

Background: Post-acute myocardial infarction (post-AMI) infection is an infrequent but important and serious complication in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Predicting its occurrence is essential for future prevention. However, little is known about the prediction of post-AMI infection in such patients to date. This study aims to develop and validate a new risk score based on risk factors for early prediction of infection in STEMI patients undergoing PCI. Methods: This prospective, multi-center and observational study assesses the predictive value of risk score for post-AMI infection among a cohort of patients hospitalized due to STEMI. The STEMI patients undergoing PCI enrolled between January 1st 2010 and May 31st 2016 were served as a development cohort while those enrolled from June 1st 2016 to May 31st 2018 were served as validation cohort. The primary endpoint was post-AMI infection during hospitalization, defined as infection requiring antibiotics (reflecting the clinical influence of infection compatible with the necessity for additional treatment), and all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and stroke were considered as secondary endpoints. The risk score model based on risk factors was established using stepwise logistic regression, and will be validated in other centers and external patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Results: This study will provide evidence on prognostic property, reliability of scoring, comparative performance, and suitability of the novel model for screening purpose in order to be recommended for clinical practice. Discussion: Our study is designed to develop and validate a clinical risk score for predicting infection in participants with STEMI who have undergone PCI. This simple tool may therefore improve evaluation of post-AMI infection and enhance future researches into the best practices to prevent or reduce infection in such patients. Clinical Trial Registration: www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR1900028278.

Accuracy and Prognosis Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Combined With C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Complicated Infective Endocarditis.

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and prognostic value of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with complicated infective endocarditis (IE). A total of 246 consecutive patients with complicated IE were included in the multicentric prospective observational study. These patients were divided into four groups depending on the SOFA score and CRP optimal cutoff values (≥5 points and ≥17.6 mg/L, respectively), which were determined using the receiver operating characteristic analysis: low SOFA and low CRP (n = 83), low SOFA and high CRP (n = 87), high SOFA and low CRP (n = 25), and high SOFA and high CRP (n = 51). The primary endpoint was in-hospital death, and the secondary endpoint was long-time mortality, defined as subsequent readmission and 3-years mortality in the follow-up period. High SOFA score and high CRP were associated with approximately 29.410% (15/51) of higher incidence of in-hospital death with an area under the curve of 0.872. Multivariate analyses showed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 2.242, 1.142-4.401], neurological failure (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12) (OR = 2.513, 1.041-4.224), Staphylococcus aureus (OR = 2.151, 1.252-4.513), SOFA ≥ 5 (OR = 9.320, 3.621-16.847), and surgical treatment (OR = 0.121, 0.031-0.342) were clinical predictors for in-hospital death. On following up for 12-36 months, SOFA ≥ 5 (p = 0.000) showed higher mortality. A high SOFA score combined with increased CRP levels is associated with in-hospital mortality. Also, SOFA score, but not CRP, predicts long-term mortality in complicated IE.

The reference genome and transcriptome of the limestone langur, Trachypithecus leucocephalus, reveal expansion of genes related to alkali tolerance.

BACKGROUND: Trachypithecus leucocephalus, the white-headed langur, is a critically endangered primate that is endemic to the karst mountains in the southern Guangxi province of China. Studying the genomic and transcriptomic mechanisms underlying its local adaptation could help explain its persistence within a highly specialized ecological niche. RESULTS: In this study, we used PacBio sequencing and optical assembly and Hi-C analysis to create a high-quality de novo assembly of the T. leucocephalus genome. Annotation and functional enrichment revealed many genes involved in metabolism, transport, and homeostasis, and almost all of the positively selected genes were related to mineral ion binding. The transcriptomes of 12 tissues from three T. leucocephalus individuals showed that the great majority of genes involved in mineral absorption and calcium signaling were expressed, and their gene families were significantly expanded. For example, FTH1 primarily functions in iron storage and had 20 expanded copies. CONCLUSIONS: These results increase our understanding of the evolution of alkali tolerance and other traits necessary for the persistence of T. leucocephalus within an ecologically unique limestone karst environment.

Satisfactory Long-term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With a Bare Stent for Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissections.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with a bare stent to those after TEVAR alone in patients with complicated acute type B aortic dissection (cATBAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted at 2 medical centers in China between 2010 and 2013. Patients with cATBAD were randomly assigned to receive TEVAR with a bare stent (n=42) or TEVAR only (n=42). Patients were scheduled to undergo computed tomography angiography at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually to 5 years. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 5 years; secondary outcomes were a composite of complications (endoleak, stent-graft-induced new entry, aortic rupture, and secondary intervention) and aortic remodeling at 1 and 5 years. RESULTS: All-cause death occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient in the TEVAR with bare stent group (lung cancer) and 5 patients (11.9%) in the TEVAR group (4 aorta-related) during the 5-year follow-up (log-rank p=0.025). The 1- and 5-year rates of complications and secondary interventions did not differ between the groups. Patients in the TEVAR with bare stent group had higher increases in the thoracic true lumen diameter (19.7±3.6 vs 17.0±6.2 mm, p=0.018) and abdominal true lumen diameter (13.7±4.8 vs 7.2±6.1 mm, p<0.001) and a higher incidence of complete false lumen thrombosis (80.9% vs 47.6%, p=0.005) at the 1-year follow-up. However, no between-group differences in the changes of aortic remodeling parameters were observed between the 1- and 5-year follow-up periods. CONCLUSION: The addition of a distal bare stent to a thoracic stent-graft during TEVAR was associated with significantly improved long-term survival in cATBAD patients vs TEVAR only, likely due to the prevention of true lumen collapse and improvement of complete false lumen thrombosis of the dissected aorta.

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for treating de novo coronary lesions in large vessels: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the efficiency of drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared to drug-eluting stents (DES) for de novo lesions in large vessels have reported inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE: This comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical trials compared the efficacy and safety of DCB and DES for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. METHODS: The authors formally searched electronic databases before October 2019 to identify randomized and non-randomized clinical trials (RCTs and non-RCTs, respectively). Clinical trials were eligible for inclusion if they compared DCB with DES in patients with coronary lumen diameters >2.5 mm. RESULTS: Three RCTs and one non-RCT with a total of 321 patients were included in our meta-analysis (DCB group = 152, DES group = 169). The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.07 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.31, 0.316; P = 0.548) and the secondary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) with a risk ratio (RR) of 1.17 (95% CI: 0.46, 2.95; P = 0.746). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicated that DCB might be non-inferior to DES as evidenced by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) assessed at 6-9 months after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with coronary artery disease.

Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Artery for Coronary Diagnostic or Interventional Catheterization.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study compared the success rate and safety of a distal transradial artery (dTRA) approach to that of the conventional transradial artery (TRA) for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: From January 2019 to April 2020, nine hundred consecutive patients (height < 190 cm) scheduled for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions were randomly and equally assigned to receive either dTRA or conventional TRA catheterization. RESULTS: Successful access was achieved in 96.00% and 96.67% of the dTRA and conventional TRA groups, respectively (P=0.814). Compared with the TRA group, patients in the dTRA experienced significantly less hemostatic band removal time (150.5 ± 50.5 cf. 210.6 ± 60.5 min, P=0.032); minor bleeding of the access site (2.44% cf. 6.44%, P=0.038); hemostatic band cost (USD; 0.1 cf. 59.4, P=0); and postprocedural radial artery occlusion (1.56% cf. 3.78%, P=0.035). A lower body mass index was a higher risk factor for dTRA access failure (odds ratio = 0.79, P=0.024), with a cutoff of 22.04 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional TRA, dTRA had a comparable high success rate, with fewer associated complications. Clinicians should use the dTRA with caution in patients with low body mass index.

Significant role and mechanism of microRNA-143-3p/KLLN axis in the development of coronary heart disease.

Cardiovascular disease predominantly includes coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, results in high morbidity and mortality. MicroRNA-143-3p (miR-143-3p) is a tumor suppressor and is involved in many cancers. However, the role and mechanism of miR-143-3p in coronary heart disease is still unclear. In this study, we identified that miR-143-3p was up-regulated in rabbit CHD model. The results of TargetScan and the dual luciferase reporter assay indicated that KLLN (killin, p53 regulated DNA replication inhibitor) was a direct target of miR-143-3p. Besides, we revealed that KLLN was down-regulated in rabbit coronary heart disease model. In addition, we found that the related-markers of CHD such as TC (total cholesterol), TG (triglyceride), and LDLC (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) in the model group were significantly increased than that in the control group. And compared with the model group, miR-143-3p inhibitor significantly reduced TC, TG, LDLC expression, while miR-143-3p mimic further increased the expression of TC, TG, and LDLC. We next found that miR-143-3p mimic promoted cell viability and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, inhibited apoptosis; and these changes were reversed by KLLN-plasmid. And miR-143-3p inhibitor had the counter effects. Our study provided a new target for the treatment of CHD and deserves further study.

A comprehensive clinical diagnostic score system for prediction of coronary artery spasm in patients with acute chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no validated multivariate model to predict probability of coronary artery spasm (CAS) in patients with acute chest pain. METHODS: A total of 976 consecutive patients with acute chest pain were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of significant CAS. To adjust potential confounders, a multivariable analysis was performed and a clinical diagnostic score system for CAS was utilized for score derivation. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis model selected 6 predictors for CAS. The integer score was assigned to each predictors: angina at rest alone (10 points), positive of hyperventilation test (8 points), allergies (3 points), asthma, ST-segment elevation and myocardial bridge (2 points each). We showed that the clinical diagnostic score system had accuracy in predicting CAS, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), which was 0.952-0.966. The cut-off baseline value for the clinical diagnostic score system was set to 11-12 points with specificity of 91.0-93.3% and sensitivity of 90.7-92.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A clinical diagnostic score system was derived and validated as an accurate tool for estimating the pretest probability of CAS in patients with acute chest pain.

Sympathectomy versus conventional treatment for refractory coronary artery spasm.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus on the potential efficacy and indications for sympathectomy to prevent recurrence of vasospasm in patients with refractory coronary artery spasm (CAS). OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of sympathectomy with those of conventional treatment in patients with refractory CAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory CAS were randomly assigned to sympathectomy group (n = 37) or conventional treatment group (n = 42). The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) episodes (including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, and life-threatening arrhythmia), and the secondary end point was death from any cause within 24 months after randomization. RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 24 months, the incidence of MACE in the sympathectomy and conventional treatment groups was 16.22 and 61.90%, respectively (P = 0.0001). All-cause death as the secondary end point occurred in zero and six (14.29%) patients, respectively (P = 0.0272). The Kaplan-Meier curve for MACE and all-cause death showed a significant between-group difference (log-rank test, P = 0.0013 and 0.0176, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional treatment, sympathectomy significantly reduced the composite end point of MACE episodes and death from any cause in patients with refractory CAS by effectively preventing recurrence of vasospasm.

MicroRNA-133b regulates the growth and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells by targeting matrix metallopeptidase 9.

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease affecting the whole arterial tree of the human body, and it is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases.Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) have been identified to play a key role in the development of atherosclerosis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a group of endogenous small non-coding RNAs, and they play a critical role in many biological processes including regulating cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis. However, till now, the expression and role of miR-133b in atherosclerosis remain largely unknown. Therefore, our purpose was to investigate the expression and role of miR-133b in atherosclerosis and to explore the underlying mechanism. The results showed that miR-133b was down-regulated in the blood and vascular plaque tissues of rabbits with atherosclerosis. Matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) was a direct target of miR-133b. In addition, our data indicated that miR-133b mimic could significantly inhibit rVSMC cell proliferation activity, migration ability and induce cell apoptosis compared with the control group, and all these effects were reversed by MMP-9-plasmid. Taken together, these findings highlight an important role for miR-133b/MMP-9 axis in atherosclerosis. And miR-133b might be a valuable clinical marker and therapeutic target for atherosclerosis.