Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 60(1): 58-68, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22909028

ABSTRACT

Most records of European bat lyssaviruses (EBLVs) are confined to three species - the serotine bat for EBLV1 (900 records) and Daubenton's bat and the pond bat for EBLV2 (25 records). High levels of seroprevalence, which may vary from year to year, are also recorded. All bat vectors of EBLVs are synanthropic, some exclusively so. Despite this, there have been only five cases of human rabies resulting from EBLV infection in the 590 million people of greater Europe during the last 35 years. These have triggered major programmes of surveillance in many European countries. The emphasis on active versus passive surveillance and the intensity with which they have been carried out has varied from country to country. Both involve cooperation between bat researchers, virologists and public health officials and the latter, in particular, engages amateur bat workers and members of the public. Bat NGOs throughout Europe have worked to persuade the public not to handle bats or to do so only with gloved hands and, in the case of bat workers, to receive pre-exposure immunization. They have also countered negative media coverage of bat rabies. Householders with bat roosts in their dwellings have in general been persuaded to retain their bats. Attempts have been made to persuade all European countries to establish comparable EBLV surveillance programmes. In the last 25 years, virologists, public health officials, bat biologists and conservationists, both amateur and professional have worked closely and collaboratively for the protection of the public and the conservation of bats, with little polarization of views.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera/virology , Lyssavirus/genetics , Public Health , Rabies/veterinary , Animals , Conservation of Natural Resources , Europe/epidemiology , Host Specificity , Humans , Lyssavirus/immunology , Public Health Surveillance , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/prevention & control , Rabies/virology , Research , Risk , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Zoonoses
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 137(6): 803-9, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18205973

ABSTRACT

We present the frequency and the nature of contact incidents of the Serotine bat, Eptesicus serotinus, with humans and with companion animals (specifically cats and dogs), in The Netherlands between 2000 and 2005. Out of 17 bats in bite contact with humans, five tested positive for European bat lyssavirus (EBLV) type 1a. Cats had the most numerous contacts with bats (49 times) but a relatively low number of these bats were EBLV positive (six times). We estimated that the average incidence of human bat rabies infection might be between once per year and once per 700 years, depending mainly on the number of infectious viral particles in bat saliva. The risk of bat rabies is higher between April and October, and in the northern half of the country. This is the first study in Europe describing the risk of human bat rabies after bat contact incidents.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera , Lyssavirus/isolation & purification , Public Health , Rhabdoviridae Infections/veterinary , Animals , Cat Diseases/transmission , Cat Diseases/virology , Cats , Dog Diseases/transmission , Dog Diseases/virology , Dogs , Humans , Netherlands/epidemiology , Rhabdoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Rhabdoviridae Infections/transmission , Risk Factors
3.
Dev Biol (Basel) ; 125: 245-54, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16878482

ABSTRACT

Bats are legally protected in most European countries under some international treaties and national nature conservation legislations that prohibit deliberate capture and killing of bats except under permit from the competent authorities. However, bat rabies research is necessary to gain insight into whether bat rabies is a real problem for public health and whether bat conservation efforts are in conflict with public health interests. It is also important to know the incidence of rabies in different bat species. Thus far, passive surveillance of bat rabies seems to be a sufficient mean of obtaining information about the occurrence of bat rabies that is not in conflict with bat conservation. Knowledge about the occurrence of bat rabies, the prevalence of rabies in particular species of bats, and the possible risk for public and animal health is also important for improving public awareness for bat conservation in conjunction with public health. There should, therefore, be good cooperation between bat conservationists and rabies research bodies.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera/virology , Disease Vectors , Lyssavirus , Rabies , Zoonoses , Animal Technicians , Animals , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Europe , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Occupational Exposure , Rabies/epidemiology , Rabies/prevention & control , Rabies/virology , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...