Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Dev Neurosci ; 38: 155-60, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016068

ABSTRACT

We describe the seizure and EEG characteristics in a population of children with known Fragile X. The medical records of 135 genetically confirmed FXS patients receiving care in a Fragile X clinic and their available EEG reports were reviewed. The mean age was 5.94 years old including 18 males and 1 female. The mean age was 4-9 years old with an age range of 15 months to 13 years old. Twenty-two patients (16.3%) in the series had parent-reported behavior suspicious of seizures. Sixteen patients (14.1%, 1 female) had at least one EEG recorded for evaluation of clinical events suspicious for seizure, and three patients (2.2%) had an EEG in the context of a polysomnography for diagnosing sleep apnea. The mean age at EEG evaluation was 6.0 years (standard deviation 3.8 years). EEG findings included slowing of background rhythm (n=9) and epileptiform discharges (n=7). Four patients had normal EEGs (n=4). Six patients (4.4% of the sample population) were diagnosed with epilepsy by both clinical seizure semiology and documented EEG abnormalities. Thirteen patients (68.4% of total) had episodes of staring and behavioral arrest with no EEG correlate, indicating non-epileptic events. Of the eight patients who underwent a repeat EEG, five patients had showed normalization in the posterior dominant rhythm over time, two patients had unchanged findings and one patient had worsening of his EEG. Our data warrant further prospective validation.


Subject(s)
Brain Waves/physiology , Brain/physiopathology , Fragile X Syndrome/complications , Fragile X Syndrome/pathology , Seizures/etiology , Adolescent , Brain/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Infant , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Seizures/diagnosis
2.
Pediatrics ; 125(4): e727-35, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20231187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence indicate a strong genetic contribution to autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Current guidelines for clinical genetic testing recommend a G-banded karyotype to detect chromosomal abnormalities and fragile X DNA testing, but guidelines for chromosomal microarray analysis have not been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 933 patients received clinical genetic testing for a diagnosis of ASD between January 2006 and December 2008. Clinical genetic testing included G-banded karyotype, fragile X testing, and chromosomal microarray (CMA) to test for submicroscopic genomic deletions and duplications. Diagnostic yield of clinically significant genetic changes was compared. RESULTS: Karyotype yielded abnormal results in 19 of 852 patients (2.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.73%-2.73%]), fragile X testing was abnormal in 4 of 861 (0.46% [95% CI: 0.36%-0.56%]), and CMA identified deletions or duplications in 154 of 848 patients (18.2% [95% CI: 14.76%-21.64%]). CMA results for 59 of 848 patients (7.0% [95% CI: 5.5%-8.5%]) were considered abnormal, which includes variants associated with known genomic disorders or variants of possible significance. CMA results were normal in 10 of 852 patients (1.2%) with abnormal karyotype due to balanced rearrangements or unidentified marker chromosome. CMA with whole-genome coverage and CMA with targeted genomic regions detected clinically relevant copy-number changes in 7.3% (51 of 697) and 5.3% (8 of 151) of patients, respectively, both higher than karyotype. With the exception of recurrent deletion and duplication of chromosome 16p11.2 and 15q13.2q13.3, most copy-number changes were unique or identified in only a small subset of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CMA had the highest detection rate among clinically available genetic tests for patients with ASD. Interpretation of microarray data is complicated by the presence of both novel and recurrent copy-number variants of unknown significance. Despite these limitations, CMA should be considered as part of the initial diagnostic evaluation of patients with ASD.


Subject(s)
Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/diagnosis , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/genetics , Genetic Testing , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Humans , Infant , Karyotyping/methods , Male , Microarray Analysis/methods , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...