Evaluating peripheral neuromuscular function with brief movement-evoked pain.

Movement-evoked pain is an understudied manifestation of musculoskeletal conditions that contributes to disability, yet little is known about how the neuromuscular system responds to movement-evoked pain. The present study examined whether movement-evoked pain impacts force production, electromyographic (EMG) muscle activity, and the rate of force development (RFD) during submaximal muscle contractions. Fifteen healthy adults (9 males; age = 30.3 ± 10.2 yr, range = 22-59 yr) performed submaximal isometric first finger abduction contractions without pain (baseline) and with movement-evoked pain induced by laser stimulation to the dorsum of the hand. Normalized force (% maximal voluntary contraction) and RFD decreased by 11% (P < 0.001) and 15% (P = 0.003), respectively, with movement-evoked pain, without any change in normalized peak EMG (P = 0.77). Early contractile RFD, force impulse, and corresponding EMG amplitude computed within time segments of 50, 100, 150, and 200 ms relative to the onset of movement were also unaffected by movement-evoked pain (P > 0.05). Our results demonstrate that movement-evoked pain impairs peak characteristics and not early measures of submaximal force production and RFD, without affecting EMG activity (peak and early). Possible explanations for the stability in EMG with reduced force include antagonist coactivation and a reorganization of motoneuronal activation strategy, which is discussed here.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We provide neurophysiological evidence to indicate that peak force and rate of force development are reduced by movement-evoked pain despite a lack of change in EMG and early rapid force development in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Additional evidence suggests that these findings may coexist with a reorganization in motoneuronal activation strategy.

Pain-related gamma band activity is dependent on the features of nociceptive stimuli: a comparison of laser and contact heat.

Painful contact heat and laser stimulation offer an avenue to characterize nociceptive pathways involved in acute pain processing, by way of evoked potentials. Direct comparisons of radiant laser and contact heat are limited, particularly in context of examining time-frequency responses to stimulation. This is important in light of recent evidence to suggest that gamma band oscillations (GBOs) represent a functionally heterogeneous measure of pain. The purpose of the current study was to investigate differences in GBOs generated in response to laser and contact heat stimulation of the nondominant forearm. Following intensity matching to pain ratings, evoked electroencephalography (EEG) responses to laser and contact heat stimulation were examined in the time-frequency domain in the same participants (19 healthy adults) across two sessions. At ∼200 ms, both contact heat and laser stimulation resulted in significant, group-level event-related synchronization (ERS) in the low gamma band (i.e., 30-60 Hz) in central electrode locations (Cc, Cz, Ci). Laser stimulation also generated ERS in the 60-100 Hz range (i.e., high gamma), at ∼200 ms, while contact heat led to a significant period of desynchronization in the high gamma range between 400 and 600 ms. Both contact heat and laser GBOs were stronger on the central electrodes contralateral to the stimulated forearm, indicative of primary somatosensory cortex involvement. Based on our findings, and taken in conjunction with previous studies, laser and contact heat stimulation generate characteristically different responses in the brain, with only the former leading to high-frequency GBOs characteristic of painful stimuli.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Despite matching pain perception between noxious laser and contact heat stimuli, we report notable differences in gamma band oscillations (GBO), measured via electroencephalography. GBOs produced following contact heat more closely resembled that of nonnoxious stimuli, while GBOs following laser stimuli were in line with previous reports. Taken together, laser and contact heat stimulation generate characteristically different responses in the brain, with only the former leading to high-frequency GBOs characteristic of painful stimuli.

Quality of meta-analyses of non-opioid, pharmacological, perioperative interventions for chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to aggregate observations from clinical trials, several meta-analyses have been published examining the effectiveness of systemic, non-opioid, pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain. OBJECTIVE: To inform the design and reporting of future studies, the purpose of our study was to examine the quality of these meta-analyses. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We conducted an electronic literature search in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Published meta-analyses, from the years 2010 to 2020, examining the effect of perioperative, systemic, non-opioid pharmacological treatments on the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients were identified. Data extraction focused on methodological details. Meta-analysis quality was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) critical appraisal tool. FINDINGS: Our search yielded 17 published studies conducting 58 meta-analyses for gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), ketamine, lidocaine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and mexiletine. According to AMSTAR 2, 88.2% of studies (or 15/17) were low or critically low in quality. The most common critical element missing was an analysis of publication bias. Trends indicated an improvement in quality over time and association with journal impact factor. CONCLUSIONS: With few individual trials adequately powered to detect treatment effects, meta-analyses play a crucial role in informing the perioperative management of chronic postsurgical pain. In light of this inherent value and despite a number of attempts, high-quality meta-analyses are still needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021230941.

Efficacy of topical cannabinoids in the management of pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE: Cannabinoids are emerging as an alternative pain management option, preliminarily supported by preclinical and clinical studies. Unwanted side effects from oral or inhaled cannabinoids remain, however, a major barrier to widespread use. Peripherally acting cannabinoids (eg, topically applied) may circumvent these side effects while providing localized pain management. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to systematically review the literature on the effectiveness of peripherally acting cannabinoids for pain management. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PubMed databases. Included studies examined the effect of topical/peripherally administered cannabinoids on pain ratings in humans, as well as pain-related outcomes in animals (eg, paw withdrawal). Due to a lack of trials, human studies were summarized in a narrative synthesis. Separate meta-analyses were performed for animal studies using radiant tail flick or paw withdrawal outcomes. FINDINGS: Our search yielded 1182 studies following removal of duplicates, with 46 studies (6 human, 40 animal) included. Human studies (one randomized controlled trial and five case studies/series) reported no adverse events to topical cannabinoids and preliminary evidence of decreased pain ratings. Animal studies reporting tail flick (5) (2.81, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.69, p<0.001) and mechanical withdrawal (11) (2.74, 95% CI 1.82 to 3.67, p<0.001) reported prolonged responses (analgesia) in peripheral cannabinoid groups compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Preclinical animal studies provided low-quality evidence for peripherally administered cannabinoids to provide regional, antinociceptive effects. The scarcity of high-quality human studies underscores the need to translate preclinical evidence into well-controlled human trials.

Differences and similarities among questionnaires to assess pain status in chronic widespread pain population: a quantitative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, multiple questionnaires are often used as part of the diagnosis of chronic widespread pain. Body Surface Area (BSA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Fibromyalgia Diagnostic Criteria (FDC) and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) have all been used as screening tools to assess pain status in individuals with widespread pain. However, substantial overlap can be observed among these commonly employed questionnaires. This study aimed to quantitatively determine the most independent and dependent clinical characteristics obtained through these questionnaires and to examine potential redundancies. METHODS: Seventy-nine participants with widespread pain, 61 females and 18 males, from a chronic pain outpatient clinic were recruited. The FDC, BSA, VAS and the CSI were measured for all participants. A principal component analysis (PCA) using a varimax rotation was used to determine which clinical measures represented separate constructs of widespread pain. This was followed by a regression analysis to assess redundancy between the constructs and related pain characteristics. RESULTS: The identified three-component PCA solution was characterized by (1) the FDC and CSI score, (2) the VAS score and (3) the BSA score. This indicates that the BSA and the VAS scores capture independent patient information. From the regression analysis, the FDC and CSI scores shared approximately 80% of the variance, indicative of substantial overlap between scores. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that BSA and VAS scores were independent clinical measures of widespread chronic pain, while the FDC and CSI scores were not independent, were highly correlated and provided redundant information. Clinicians should continue using both the BSA and VAS; however, either only FDC or CSI will be beneficial during clinical assessment of widespread chronic pain.

Exploring the effect of capsaicin-induced central sensitization on the upper limb nociceptive withdrawal reflex threshold.

The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (NWR) threshold is commonly employed in the lower limb to assess clinical and experimentally induced pain. However, no studies to date have investigated changes in spinal nociception in the upper limb, via the NWR threshold, following experimentally induced central sensitization (CS). We tested the hypothesis that experimentally induced CS of the C5-C6 spinal segment significantly reduces NWR thresholds in muscles of the upper limb. Upper limb NWR thresholds from 20 young, healthy adults were assessed by applying noxious electrical stimuli to the right index finger and recording muscle activity from the biceps brachii (BI), triceps brachii (TRI), flexor carpi ulnaris (WF), and extensor carpi radialis longus (WE) muscles via surface electromyography. Topical cream (either 0.075% capsaicin, or control) was applied to the C5-C6 dermatome of the lateral forearm (50 cm2). NWR thresholds were compared at baseline, and four 10-min intervals after topical application. WF muscle NWR thresholds were significantly reduced in the capsaicin session compared to control, while TRI muscle NWR thresholds were significantly reduced 40 min after capsaicin application only (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences for BI or WE muscle NWR thresholds. We observed poor to moderate test-retest reliability for all upper limb NWR thresholds, a key contributor to the selective reduction in NWR thresholds among muscles. Accordingly, while our findings demonstrate some comparability to previously reported lower limb NWR studies, we concurrently report limitations of the upper limb NWR technique. Further exploration of optimal parameters for upper limb NWR acquisition is needed.

Re-Examining Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Toward Biomarker Development and Mechanism-Based Diagnostic Criteria.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We discuss the need for a mechanism-based diagnostic framework with a focus on the development of objective measures (e.g., biomarkers) that can potentially be added to the diagnostic criteria of the syndrome. Potential biomarkers are discussed in relation to current knowledge on the pathophysiology of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), including alterations in redox status, inflammation, and the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) biochemical milieu, as well as imaging and neurophysiological outcomes. Finally, we discuss the long-term goal of conducting a Delphi survey, to assess the influence of putative MPS biomarkers on clinician opinion, in order to ultimately develop new criteria for the diagnosis of MPS. RECENT FINDINGS: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a prevalent healthcare condition associated with muscle weakness, impaired mood, and reduced quality of life. MPS is characterized by the presence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs): stiff and discrete nodules located within taut bands of skeletal muscle that are painful upon palpation. However, physical examination of MTrPs often yields inconsistent results, and there is no gold standard by which to diagnose MPS. The current MPS diagnostic paradigm has an inherent subjectivity and the absence of correlation with the underlying pathophysiology. Recent advancements in ultrasound imaging, systemic biomarkers, MTrP-specific biomarkers, and the assessment of dysfunction in the somatosensorial system may all contribute to improved diagnostic effectiveness of MPS.

Routine Blood Chemistry Predicts Functional Recovery After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Post Hoc Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to various degrees of lifelong functional deficits. Most individuals with incomplete SCI experience a certain degree of functional recovery, especially within the first-year postinjury. However, this is difficult to predict, and surrogate biomarkers are urgently needed. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to (1) determine if routine blood chemistry parameters are related to neurological recovery after SCI, (2) evaluate if such parameters could predict functional recovery, and (3) establish cutoff values that could inform clinical decision-making. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of routine blood chemistry parameters in patients with traumatic SCI (n = 676). Blood samples were collected between 24 and 72 hours as well as at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 52 weeks postinjury. Linear mixed models, regression analysis, and unbiased recursive partitioning (URP) of blood chemistry data were used to relate to and predict walking recovery 1 year postinjury. RESULTS: The temporal profile of platelet counts and serum levels of albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine differentiated patients who recovered walking from those who remained wheelchair bound. The 4 blood chemistry parameters from the sample collection 8 weeks postinjury predicted functional recovery observed 1 year after incomplete SCI. Finally, URP defined a cutoff for serum albumin at 3.7 g/dL, which in combination with baseline injury severity differentiates individuals who regain ambulation from those not able to walk. Specifically, about 80% of those with albumin >3.7 g/dL recovered walking. CONCLUSIONS: Routine blood chemistry data from the postacute phase, together with baseline injury severity, predict functional outcome after incomplete SCI.

The nociceptive flexion reflex: a scoping review and proposed standardized methodology for acquisition in those affected by chronic pain.

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) is used in neurophysiological research as an objective measure of nociception. NFR thresholds are reduced in numerous chronic pain pathologies, which are indicative of common central hyperexcitability within conditions. However, variation exists in both the NFR assessment and determinants of NFR threshold among research groups. Our purpose was to provide a review of the recent literature to (a) confirm the NFR threshold's efficacy in identifying those with chronic pain compared to controls and (b) provide a narrative synthesis on the current methodology used to assess the NFR in clinical populations. We conducted a review of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar and Cochrane Library), including articles that reported controlled clinical studies of humans, in English, comparing NFR thresholds within chronic pain conditions to matched control subjects, published since the last NFR review in 2010. Our search resulted in nine studies included in our narrative synthesis and eight studies included in a meta-analysis. There was a significant pooled standardized mean difference in NFR threshold between chronic pain conditions and controls (-0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.33 to -0.55, p < 0.0001), with substantial heterogeneity of pooled estimates (I 2 = 87%, τ 2 = 0.41, Q = 76.13, the degrees of freedom (df) = 11, p < 0.0001). Significant variations in participant positioning, stimulation parameters and determinants of the NFR threshold were evident among included studies. We provided a narrative synthesis on the methodologies of included studies, as a recommendation for future studies in the assessment of the NFR in chronic pain.

The Influence of Examiner Gender on Responses to Tonic Heat Pain Assessments: A Preliminary Investigation.

Background: The influence of examiner gender on pain reporting has been previously explored in both research and clinical settings. However, previous investigations have been limited, with the majority of studies employing single, static assessments of pain (e.g., cold pressor test, verbal pain ratings). The impact of examiner gender on both static and dynamic heat-based pain assessments is currently unknown. Methods: Thirty eight participants (20 females aged 24.1 ± 4.44, and 18 males, aged 24.8 ± 4.54) completed two identical testing sessions, randomized to a male and female examiner in a cross-over design. Pain sensitivity was examined using heat pain thresholds, verbal pain ratings to tonic heat, computerized visual analog scale (CoVAS) rating to tonic heat, and participant-controlled temperature (PCT) heat pain assessments. Results: Female participants reported higher verbal pain to tonic heat with a female examiner compared to male participants, with similar trends for CoVAS responses to tonic heat. Conversely heat pain thresholds and PCT were not significantly influenced by experimenter gender. Conclusions: Overall, verbal ratings were the most impacted by examiner gender, with temperature-based methods such as PCT and pain thresholds showing little to no examiner gender effects. While the gender of the examiner may be an important consideration in the measurement of sex and gender differences in pain research, the choice of pain assessment method may be of similar consequence.

Single-trial averaging improves the physiological interpretation of contact heat evoked potentials.

Laser and contact heat evoked potentials (LEPs and CHEPs, respectively) provide an objective measure of pathways and processes involved in nociception. The majority of studies analyzing LEP or CHEP outcomes have done so based on conventional, across-trial averaging. With this approach, evoked potential components are potentially confounded by latency jitter and ignore relevant information contained within single trials. The current study addressed the advantage of analyzing nociceptive evoked potentials based on responses to noxious stimulations within each individual trial. Single-trial and conventional averaging were applied to data previously collected in 90 healthy subjects from 3 stimulation locations on the upper limb. The primary analysis focused on relationships between single and across-trial averaged CHEP outcomes (i.e., N2P2 amplitude and N2 and P2 latencies) and subject characteristics (i.e., age, sex, height, and rating of perceived intensity), which were examined by way of linear mixed model analysis. Single-trial averaging lead to larger N2P2 amplitudes and longer N2 and P2 latencies. Age and ratings of perceived intensity were the only subject level characteristics associated with CHEPs outcomes that significantly interacted with the method of analysis (conventional vs single-trial averaging). The strength of relationships for age and ratings of perceived intensity, measured by linear fit, were increased for single-trial compared to conventional across-trial averaged CHEP outcomes. By accounting for latency jitter, single-trial averaging improved the associations between CHEPs and physiological outcomes and should be incorporated as a standard analytical technique in future studies.

Biomarkers in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-Technical and Clinical Considerations: A Systematic Review.

Objective. To examine (1) if serological or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers can be used as diagnostic and/or prognostic tools in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and (2) if literature provides recommendations regarding timing and source of biomarker evaluation. Data Sources. A systematic literature search to identify studies reporting on diagnostic and prognostic blood and/or CSF biomarkers in SCI was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and PEDro. Study Selection. Clinical trials, cohort, and pilot studies on patients with traumatic SCI investigating at least one blood or CSF biomarker were included. Following systematic screening, 19 articles were included in the final analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct this review. Data Extraction. Independent extraction of articles was completed by 2 authors using predefined inclusion criteria and study quality indicators. Data Synthesis. Nineteen studies published between 2002 and April 2019 with 1596 patients were included in the systematic review. In 14 studies, blood biomarkers were measured, 4 studies investigated CSF biomarkers, and 1 study used both blood and CSF samples. Conclusions. Serum/CSF concentrations of several biomarkers (S100b, IL-6, GFAP, NSE, tau, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1, pNF-H, and IP-10) following SCI are highly time dependent and related to injury severity. Future studies need to validate these markers as true biomarkers and should control for secondary complications associated with SCI. A deeper understanding of secondary pathophysiological events after SCI and their effect on biomarker dynamics may improve their clinical significance as surrogate parameters in future clinical studies.

The Acute Effect of Skin Preheating on Capsaicin-Induced Central Sensitization in Humans.

INTRODUCTION: Topical capsaicin is commonly employed to experimentally induce central sensitization (CS) in humans. While previous studies have investigated the effect of skin preheating on the sensitizing effect of capsaicin, no studies have compared the synergistic effect of skin preheating on the magnitude of sensitization via topical capsaicin within the first 30 minutes of application. We tested the hypothesis that skin preheating potentiates the sensitizing effect of topical capsaicin by evoking a larger region of secondary hyperalgesia vs. topical capsaicin alone. METHODS: Twenty young, healthy subjects each received topical capsaicin (Zostrix HP 0.075%) only (CAP), topical capsaicin with preheating (CAP + HEAT), and topical nonsensitizing placebo cream (CON) in a crossover design. Capsaicin and placebo creams were applied to a 50 cm2 area of the dorsal forearm. The CAP + HEAT session also included a 10-minute preheating session. Regions of secondary hyperalgesia were assessed using mechanical brush allodynia testing, and skin temperature was assessed via infrared thermography. Outcomes were normalized to baseline and compared at 10, 20, and 30 minutes after cream application. RESULTS: The CAP + HEAT session led to a significantly larger area of secondary hyperalgesia compared to the CAP session as measured by brush allodynia (CON: 0 ± 0 cm; CAP: 2.08 ± 0.45 cm; CAP + HEAT: 3.70 ± 0.46 cm; P < 0.05) and skin temperature (CON: -2.92% ± 0.03%; CAP: -0.63% ± 0.09%; CAP + HEAT: 2.50% ± 0.11%; ( of baseline) P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Preheating amplifies the sensitizing effect of topical capsaicin within 30 minutes of application. The heat-capsaicin technique may be employed to assess differing magnitudes of CS induction and enables future studies investigating the development and progression of CS in humans.

Contact Heat Evoked Potentials Are Responsive to Peripheral Sensitization: Requisite Stimulation Parameters.

The sensitizing effect of capsaicin has been previously characterized using laser and contact heat evoked potentials (LEPs and CHEPs) by stimulating in the primary area of hyperalgesia. Interestingly, only CHEPs reveal changes consistent with notion of peripheral sensitization (i.e., reduced latencies). The aim of this study was to investigate contact heat stimulation parameters necessary to detect peripheral sensitization related to the topical application of capsaicin, and therefore significantly improve the current method of measuring peripheral sensitization via CHEPs. Rapid contact heat stimulation (70°C/s) was applied from three different baseline temperatures (35, 38.5, and 42°C) to a 52°C peak temperature, before and after the topical application of capsaicin on the hand dorsum. Increased pain ratings in the primary area of hyperalgesia were accompanied by reduced N2 latency. Changes in N2 latency were, however, only significant following stimulation from 35 and 38.5°C baseline temperatures. These findings suggest that earlier recruitment of capsaicin-sensitized afferents occurs between 35 and 42°C, as stimulations from 42°C baseline were unchanged by capsaicin. This is in line with reduced thresholds of type II A-delta mechanoheat (AMH) nociceptors following sensitization. Conventional CHEP stimulation, with a baseline temperature below 42°C, is well suited to objectively detect evidence of peripheral sensitization.

The Relationship between Rate of Algometer Application and Pain Pressure Threshold in the Assessment of Myofascial Trigger Point Sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Pressure algometry is a commonly employed technique in the assessment of both regional and widespread musculoskeletal pain. Despite its acceptance amongst clinicians and scientists, the relationship between rate of pressure application (RoA) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) remains poorly understood. We set out to test the hypothesis that a strong, positive, linear relationship exists between the RoA and the PPT within the infraspinatus of young healthy subjects. METHODS: Thirty-three participants were randomly recruited from the local university community. PPT measures were recorded from a clinically identified myofascial trigger point within the right infraspinatus muscle during pressure algometry. A total of 2 PPT measures were recorded using each of 3 different RoAs, including low (15 N/s), medium (35 N/s), and high (55 N/s). Three baseline trials were also conducted at 30 N/s. The Pearson's correlation coefficient between RoA and PPT was calculated for each subject and averaged across participants. RESULTS: The mean(SD) correlation between subjects was 0.77 (0.19), and the mean (SD) slope of the linear regression was 0.13 (0.09). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that there is a strong, linear relationship between the RoA and PPT when using the pressure algometry technique. The low slope between RoA and PPT suggests clinicians can rely on PPT assessments despite small RoA fluctuations. Future research should explore this relationship further in a clinical population and in other muscles affected by chronic myofascial pain. Advancing cost-effective, reliable, and clinically feasible tools such as algometry is important to enhancing the diagnosis and management of chronic myofascial pain.

The Effect of Abdominal Muscle Activation Techniques on Trunk and Lower Limb Mechanics During the Single-Leg Squat Task in Females.

CONTEXT: Females suffer 4 to 6 times more noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries than males due to neuromuscular control deficits of the hip musculature leading to increases in hip adduction angle, knee abduction angle, and knee abduction moment during dynamic tasks such as single-leg squats. Lateral trunk displacement has been further related to ACL injury risk in females, leading to the incorporation of core strength/stability exercises in ACL preventative training programs. However, the direct mechanism relating lateral trunk displacement and lower limb ACL risk factors is not well established. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between lateral trunk displacement and lower limb measures of ACL injury risk by altering trunk control through abdominal activation techniques during single-leg squats in healthy females. DESIGN: Interventional study setting: movement and posture laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 healthy females (21.3 [0.88] y, 1.68 [0.07] m, and 58.27 [5.46] kg). INTERVENTION: Trunk position and lower limb kinematics were recorded using an optoelectric motion capture system during single-leg squats under differing conditions of abdominal muscle activation (abdominal hollowing, abdominal bracing, and control), confirmed using surface electromyography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lateral trunk displacement, peak hip adduction angle, peak knee abduction angle/moment, and average muscle activity from bilateral internal oblique, external oblique, and erector spinae muscles. RESULTS: No differences were observed for peak lateral trunk displacement, peak hip adduction angle, or peak knee abduction angle/moment. Abdominal hollowing and bracing elicited greater muscle activation than the control condition, and bracing was greater than hollowing in 4 of 6 muscles recorded. CONCLUSION: The lack of reduction in trunk, hip, and knee measures of ACL injury risk during abdominal hollowing and bracing suggests that these techniques alone may provide minimal benefit in ACL injury prevention training.