Graft dilatation and Barrett's esophagus in adults after gastric pull-up and jejunal interposition for long-gap esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal replacement (ER) with gastric pull-up (GPU) or jejunal interposition (JI) used to be the standard treatment for long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). Changes of the ER grafts on a macro- and microscopic level however, are unknown. AIM: To evaluate long-term clinical symptoms and anatomical and mucosal changes in adolescents and adults after ER for LGEA. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted including all LGEA patients ≥ 16 years who had undergone GPU or JI between 1985-2003 at two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. Patients underwent clinical assessment, contrast study and endoscopy with biopsy. Data was collected prospectively. Group differences between JI and GPU patients, and associations between different outcome measures were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for bivariate variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Differences with a P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Nine GPU patients and eleven JI patients were included. Median age at follow-up was 21.5 years and 24.4 years, respectively. Reflux was reported in six GPU patients (67%) vs four JI patients (36%) (P = 0.37). Dysphagia symptoms were reported in 64% of JI patients, compared to 22% of GPU patients (P = 0.09). Contrast studies showed dilatation of the jejunal graft in six patients (55%) and graft lengthening in four of these six patients. Endoscopy revealed columnar-lined esophagus in three GPU patients (33%) and intestinal metaplasia was histologically confirmed in two patients (22%). No association was found between reflux symptoms and macroscopic anomalies or intestinal metaplasia. Three GPU patients (33%) experienced severe feeding problems vs none in the JI group. The median body mass index of JI patients was 20.9 kg/m2 vs 19.5 kg/m2 in GPU patients (P = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The majority of GPU patients had reflux and intestinal metaplasia in 22%. The majority of JI patients had dysphagia and a dilated graft. Follow-up after ER for LGEA is essential.

Validation of low-cost models for minimal invasive surgery training of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and esophageal atresia.

BACKGROUND: Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly used for the correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and esophageal atresia (EA). It is important to master these complex procedures, preferably preclinically, to avoid complications. The aim of this study was to validate recently developed models to train these MIS procedures preclinically. METHODS: Two low cost, reproducible models (one for CDH and one for EA) were validated during several pediatric surgical conferences and training sessions (January 2017-December 2018), used in either the LaparoscopyBoxx or EoSim simulator. Participants used one or both models and completed a questionnaire regarding their opinion on realism (face validity) and didactic value (content validity), rated on a five-point-Likert scale. RESULTS: Of all 60 participants enrolled, 44 evaluated the EA model. All items were evaluated as significantly better than neutral, with means ranging from 3.7 to 4.1 (p < 0.001). The CDH model was evaluated by 48 participants. All items scored significantly better than neutral (means 3.5-3.9, p < 0.001), with exception of the haptics of the simulated diaphragm (mean 3.3, p = 0.054). Both models were considered a potent training tool (means 3.9). CONCLUSION: These readily available and low budget models are considered a valid and potent training tool by both experts and target group participants. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrostomy (LAG) are widely used in the paediatric population. The aim of this study was to determine which one of the two procedures is the most effective and safe method. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. Primary outcomes were success rate, efficacy of feeding, quality of life, gastroesophageal reflux and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Five retrospective studies, comparing 550 PEG to 483 LAG placements in children, were identified after screening 2347 articles. The completion rate was similar for both procedures. PEG was associated with significantly more adjacent bowel injuries (P = 0.047), early tube dislodgements (P = 0.02) and complications that require reintervention under general anaesthesia (P < 0.001). Minor complications were equally frequent after both procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of well-designed studies, we have to be cautious in making definitive conclusions comparing PEG to LAG. To decide which type of gastrostomy placement is best practice in paediatric patients, randomised controlled trials comparing PEG to LAG are highly warranted.