Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 38(5): 689-97, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23942319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Liraglutide 3.0 mg, with diet and exercise, produced substantial weight loss over 1 year that was sustained over 2 years in obese non-diabetic adults. Nausea was the most frequent side effect. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate routinely collected data on nausea and vomiting among individuals on liraglutide and their influence on tolerability and body weight. DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind 20-week study with an 84-week extension (sponsor unblinded at 20 weeks, open-label after 1 year) in eight European countries (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00422058). SUBJECTS: After commencing a 500-kcal/day deficit diet plus exercise, 564 participants (18-65 years, body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg m(-2)) were randomly assigned (after a 2-week run-in period) to once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide (1.2, 1.8, 2.4 or 3.0 mg), placebo or open-label orlistat (120 mg × 3 per day). After 1 year, participants on liraglutide/placebo switched to liraglutide 2.4 mg, and subsequently, to liraglutide 3.0 mg (based on 20-week and 1-year results, respectively). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 561 participants (n=90-98 per arm, age 45.9±10.3 years, BMI 34.8±2.7 kg m(-2) (mean±s.d.)). In year 1, more participants reported ⩾1 episode of nausea/vomiting on treatment with liraglutide 1.2-3.0 mg (17-38%) than with placebo or orlistat (both 4%, P⩽0.001). Most episodes occurred during dose escalation (weeks 1-6), with 'mild' or 'moderate' symptoms. Among participants on liraglutide 3.0 mg, 48% reported some nausea and 13% some vomiting, with considerable variation between countries, but only 4 out of 93 (4%) reported withdrawals. The mean 1-year weight loss on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg from randomization was 9.2 kg for participants reporting nausea/vomiting episodes, versus 6.3 kg for those with none (a treatment difference of 2.9 kg (95% confidence interval 0.5-5.3); P=0.02). Both weight losses were significantly greater than the respective weight losses for participants on placebo (P<0.001) or orlistat (P<0.05). Quality-of-life scores at 20 weeks improved similarly with or without nausea/vomiting on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg. CONCLUSION: Transient nausea and vomiting on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg was associated with greater weight loss, although symptoms appeared tolerable and did not attenuate quality-of-life improvements. Improved data collection methods on nausea are warranted.


Subject(s)
Anti-Obesity Agents/therapeutic use , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/analogs & derivatives , Nausea/chemically induced , Obesity/drug therapy , Vomiting/chemically induced , Weight Loss/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Obesity Agents/adverse effects , Body Mass Index , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/adverse effects , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/therapeutic use , Humans , Liraglutide , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/epidemiology
2.
Int J Androl ; 33(1): e207-15, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19780863

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate endothelial lipase (EL, LIPG) and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) mRNA and protein expression in normal human testis and testicular germ cell tumours (GCT). Both EL and LPL were expressed in normal seminiferous tubules and in the interstitial compartment. EL mRNA and protein were found in all germ cells as well as in Sertoli and Leydig cells. EL mRNA was abundant in pre-invasive carcinoma in situ (CIS) cells and GCTs, and EL protein was present in the cytoplasm of these cells. LPL mRNA was also relatively abundant in germ cells, Sertoli cells, CIS cells and GCTs. The LPL protein, however, was restricted to the cell membranes of pachytene spermatocytes and spermatids in normal tubules, absent from CIS cells and scarcely represented in tumours. The distribution of LPL protein in non-seminomas resembled the distribution of OCT3/4, a marker of embryonal carcinoma. The results suggest that both EL and LPL participate in the supply of nutrients and steroidogenesis in the testes, and that especially EL may be important for the supply of cholesterol for testosterone production in the Leydig cells. The partial cellular separation of the expression of the two lipases in normal testis suggests the existence of distinct biological roles, perhaps developmentally regulated, as indicated by the LPL expression in GCTs with embryonic features. A high expression of EL and abundance of lipid in tubules with CIS may have a diagnostic value.


Subject(s)
Lipase/genetics , Lipoprotein Lipase/genetics , Testicular Neoplasms/metabolism , Testis/metabolism , Carcinoma, Embryonal/metabolism , Carcinoma, Embryonal/pathology , Endothelium/metabolism , Germ Cells/metabolism , Humans , Leydig Cells/cytology , Leydig Cells/metabolism , Leydig Cells/pathology , Lipase/metabolism , Lipoprotein Lipase/metabolism , Male , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/metabolism , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/pathology , Nitric Oxide Synthase Type III , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Seminiferous Tubules/metabolism , Seminoma/metabolism , Seminoma/pathology , Sertoli Cells/cytology , Sertoli Cells/metabolism , Sertoli Cells/pathology , Spermatocytes/metabolism , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Testis/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...