Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
JMIR Med Inform ; 11: e46760, 2023 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37656018

ABSTRACT

Background: Computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly adopted in health care to optimize resources and streamline patient flow. However, they often lack scientific validation against standard medical care. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the performance, safety, and usability of a CDSS in a university hospital emergency department setting in Kuopio, Finland. Methods: Patients entering the emergency department were asked to voluntarily participate in this study. Patients aged 17 years or younger, patients with cognitive impairments, and patients who entered the unit in an ambulance or with the need for immediate care were excluded. Patients completed the CDSS web-based form and usability questionnaire when waiting for the triage nurse's evaluation. The CDSS data were anonymized and did not affect the patients' usual evaluation or treatment. Retrospectively, 2 medical doctors evaluated the urgency of each patient's condition by using the triage nurse's information, and urgent and nonurgent groups were created. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnoses were collected from the electronic health records. Usability was assessed by using a positive version of the System Usability Scale questionnaire. Results: In total, our analyses included 248 patients. Regarding urgency, the mean sensitivities were 85% and 19%, respectively, for urgent and nonurgent cases when assessing the performance of CDSS evaluations in comparison to that of physicians. The mean sensitivities were 85% and 35%, respectively, when comparing the evaluations between the two physicians. Our CDSS did not miss any cases that were evaluated to be emergencies by physicians; thus, all emergency cases evaluated by physicians were evaluated as either urgent cases or emergency cases by the CDSS. In differential diagnosis, the CDSS had an exact match accuracy of 45.5% (97/213). The usability was good, with a mean System Usability Scale score of 78.2 (SD 16.8). Conclusions: In a university hospital emergency department setting with a large real-world population, our CDSS was found to be equally as sensitive in urgent patient cases as physicians and was found to have an acceptable differential diagnosis accuracy, with good usability. These results suggest that this CDSS can be safely assessed further in a real-world setting. A CDSS could accelerate triage by providing patient-provided data in advance of patients' initial consultations and categorize patient cases as urgent and nonurgent cases upon patients' arrival to the emergency department.

2.
Cancer Res ; 75(15): 2987-98, 2015 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26122843

ABSTRACT

Disseminated high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGS-OvCa) is an aggressive disease treated with platinum and taxane combination therapy. While initial response can be favorable, the disease typically relapses and becomes resistant to treatment. As genomic alterations in HGS-OvCa are heterogeneous, identification of clinically meaningful molecular markers for outcome prediction is challenging. We developed a novel computational approach (PSFinder) that fuses transcriptomics and clinical data to identify HGS-OvCa prognostic subgroups for targeted treatment. Application of PSFinder to transcriptomics data from 180 HGS-OvCa patients treated with platinum-taxane therapy revealed 61 transcript isoforms that characterize two poor and one good survival-associated groups (P = 0.007). These groups were validated in eight independent data sets, including a prospectively collected ovarian cancer cohort. Two poor prognostic groups have distinct expression profiles and are characteristic by increased hypermethylation and stroma-related genes. Integration of the PSFinder signature and BRCA1/2 mutation status allowed even better stratification of HGS-OvCa patients' prognosis. The herein introduced novel and generally applicable computational approach can identify outcome-related subgroups and facilitate the development of precision medicine to overcome drug resistance. A limited set of biomarkers divides HGS-OvCa into three prognostic groups and predicts patients in need of targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , BRCA1 Protein/genetics , BRCA2 Protein/genetics , Bridged-Ring Compounds , Cohort Studies , CpG Islands , DNA Methylation , Female , Genetic Markers , Humans , Middle Aged , Mutation , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Reproducibility of Results , Software , Taxoids
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...