Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Buprenorphine Depot Formulations vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine With Naloxone for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder may be improved by sustained-release formulations. Objective: To determine whether treatment involving novel weekly and monthly subcutaneous (SC) buprenorphine depot formulations is noninferior to a daily sublingual (SL) combination of buprenorphine hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This outpatient, double-blind, double-dummy randomized clinical trial was conducted at 35 sites in the United States from December 29, 2015, through October 19, 2016. Participants were treatment-seeking adults with moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder. Interventions: Randomization to daily SL placebo and weekly (first 12 weeks; phase 1) and monthly (last 12 weeks; phase 2) SC buprenorphine (SC-BPN group) or to daily SL buprenorphine with naloxone (24 weeks) with matched weekly and monthly SC placebo injections (SL-BPN/NX group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points tested for noninferiority were response rate (10% margin) and the mean proportion of opioid-negative urine samples for 24 weeks (11% margin). Responder status was defined as having no evidence of illicit opioid use for at least 8 of 10 prespecified points during weeks 9 to 24, with 2 of these at week 12 and during month 6 (weeks 21-24). The mean proportion of samples with no evidence of illicit opioid use (weeks 4-24) evaluated by a cumulative distribution function (CDF) was an a priori secondary outcome with planned superiority testing if the response rate demonstrated noninferiority. Results: A total of 428 participants (263 men [61.4%] and 165 women [38.6%]; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.0] years) were randomized to the SL-BPN/NX group (n = 215) or the SC-BPN group (n = 213). The response rates were 31 of 215 (14.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 37 of 213 (17.4%) for the SC-BPN group, a 3.0% difference (95% CI, -4.0% to 9.9%; P < .001). The proportion of opioid-negative urine samples was 1099 of 3870 (28.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 1347 of 3834 (35.1%) for the SC-BPN group, a 6.7% difference (95% CI, -0.1% to 13.6%; P < .001). The CDF for the SC-BPN group (26.7%) was statistically superior to the CDF for the SL-BPN/NX group (0; P = .004). Injection site adverse events (none severe) occurred in 48 participants (22.3%) in the SL-BPN/NX group and 40 (18.8%) in the SC-BPN group. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with SL buprenorphine, depot buprenorphine did not result in an inferior likelihood of being a responder or having urine test results negative for opioids and produced superior results on the CDF of no illicit opioid use. These data suggest that depot buprenorphine is efficacious and may have advantages. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02651584.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a buprenorphine subcutaneous depot formulation (CAM2038) for once-weekly dosing in patients with opioid use disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Sublingual buprenorphine is effective for opioid dependence treatment but associated with misuse, abuse, and diversion. The present Phase I/II study evaluated a novel buprenorphine subcutaneous depot formulation for once-weekly dosing (CAM2038 q1w) in patients receiving maintenance treatment for opioid use disorder with daily sublingual buprenorphine. METHODS: After discontinuation of buprenorphine for 48h, patients received a single CAM2038 q1w dose based on their pre-study daily sublingual maintenance dose. CAM2038 q1w doses of 7.5, 15, 22.5, and 30mg were administered in a sequential dose-escalating design. The following assessments were performed: pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, pharmacodynamics (evaluated using the Subjective and Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scales), and time to intake of rescue sublingual buprenorphine medication. RESULTS: Single doses of CAM2038 q1w indicated dose-proportional buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (Cmax and AUC0-7d), with time to Cmax ~20h and an apparent terminal half-life of 3-5days, supporting once-weekly dosing. On average, patients showed a rapid and extended decrease in opiate-withdrawal symptoms from baseline, with zero or very low SOWS and COWS values measured at least up to 7days after dosing of CAM2038 q1w. The median time to first use of rescue buprenorphine was 10days. No dose dependence was seen in the pharmacodynamics, attributable to the selection of CAM2038 q1w doses based on patients' pre-study maintenance doses. CAM2038 q1w was safe and generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a novel buprenorphine subcutaneous depot formulation for once-weekly dosing was evaluated, suggesting utility in maintenance treatment of patients with opioid use disorder.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Once-Weekly and Once-Monthly Buprenorphine Subcutaneous Injection Depots (CAM2038) Versus Intravenous and Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Volunteers Under Naltrexone Blockade: An Open-Label Phase 1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: CAM2038 q1w (once weekly) and q4w (once monthly) are investigational buprenorphine subcutaneous (SC) formulations based on FluidCrystal® injection depot technology. These two drug products are being developed for opioid dependence treatment, with a target for once-weekly and once-monthly SC dosing. The rationale for developing two products with different dosing frequencies is that treatment strategies/routines, and hence different treatment preferences, can vary between patients, different stages of opioid maintenance treatment, and countries. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine following administration of CAM2038 q1w or q4w versus active controls. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized to five treatment groups. All received a single intravenous dose of buprenorphine 600 µg, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 96 mg, a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 192 mg, or sublingual buprenorphine 8, 16, or 24 mg daily for 7 days, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 64 or 128 mg or four repeated weekly doses of CAM2038 q1w 16 mg. All subjects received daily naltrexone. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects were randomized. Median buprenorphine t max after CAM2038 q4w was 4-10 h (24 h for CAM2038 q1w); mean terminal half-life was 19-25 days (5 days for CAM2038 q1w). CAM2038 q4w showed dose-proportional buprenorphine release, with similar exposure to repeat-dose CAM2038 q1w at comparable monthly dose level. Both CAM2038 formulations showed complete absolute bioavailability of buprenorphine and 5.7- to 7.7-fold greater buprenorphine bioavailability versus sublingual buprenorphine. CAM2038 q1w and q4w were well tolerated; subjects' acceptance was higher for CAM2038 than for sublingual buprenorphine 1 h post-dose. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of CAM2038 q1w and q4w versus sublingual buprenorphine support expected treatment efficacy with once-weekly and once-monthly dosing, respectively. CAM2038 formulations were safe and showed good local tolerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24987553. FUNDING: Camurus AB.

Octreotide s.c. depot provides sustained octreotide bioavailability and similar IGF-1 suppression to octreotide LAR in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: The aim was to assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of octreotide subcutaneous (s.c.) depot, a novel octreotide formulation. METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, open label study. After a single dose of octreotide immediate release (IR) 200 µg, subjects were randomized to one of eight groups to receive three monthly injections of octreotide s.c. depot A 10, 20 or 30 mg, B 30 mg, C 10, 20 or 30 mg or long acting octreotide (octreotide LAR) 30 mg. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two subjects were randomized. For all depot variants, onset of octreotide release was rapid and sustained for up to 4 weeks. The relative octreotide bioavailability of depot variants vs. octreotide IR ranged from 0.68 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 0.76) to 0.91 (90% CI 0.81, 1.02) and, vs. octreotide LAR, was approximately four- to five-fold greater: 3.97 (90% CI 3.35, 4.71) to 5.27 ng ml(-1) h (90% CI 4.43, 6.27). All depot variants showed relatively rapid initial reductions of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) compared with octreotide LAR. A trend of octreotide dose dependence was also indicated from the plasma concentrations and suppression of IGF-1. Maximum inhibition of IGF-1 at steady-state was highest for depot B and C. All depot treatments were well tolerated. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal related. CONCLUSIONS: Octreotide s.c. depot provides greater octreotide bioavailability with a more rapid onset and stronger suppression of IGF-1 than octreotide LAR in healthy volunteers.

Treatment of oral mucositis pain following radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer using a bioadhesive barrier-forming lipid solution.

PURPOSE: CAM2028, a vehicle that forms a bioadhesive lipid barrier when applied to the oral mucosa, was developed as a carrier system for local delivery of benzydamine, an NSAID used for pain relief in oral mucositis. This trial compared the analgesic effect of CAM2028 plus benzydamine (CAM2028-benzydamine) with unmedicated CAM2028 (CAM2028-control) for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head-and-neck cancer. METHODS: Thirty-eight study participants were enrolled during their 3rd to 4th week of radiation therapy. Participants were required to have symptomatic oral mucositis (WHO Grade 2 or above) at screening and pain scores of at least 6 on an 11-point Likert scale at screening and on each day before treatment with study medication. After undergoing radiation, patients were administered a single dose of CAM2028-control or CAM2028-benzydamine 2 days apart, in a randomized crossover fashion. Pain was assessed over the following 8 h. RESULTS: With both treatments, patients experienced a mean 40 % decrease in pain intensity at 6 h (the primary study endpoint). Both treatments resulted in significant pain relief within 5 min of application that was evident during the entire 8-h assessment period. There was no difference in pain relief between the two interventions at any time point. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: CAM2028-benzydamine and CAM2028-control were both efficacious in reducing pain in patients with oral mucositis related to radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer. Analgesic effects of both medications were immediate, clinically significant, and persistent for up to 8 h.

Inhalation of LPS induces inflammatory airway responses mimicking characteristics of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

AIM: Inhalation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produces both systemic and pulmonary inflammatory responses. The aim of this study was to further characterize the response to LPS in order to develop a human model suitable for early testing of drug candidates developed for the treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIALS: Blood and induced sputum were obtained 4, 24 and 48 h following inhalation of saline and LPS (5 and 50 µg). Blood was analysed for C-reactive protein (CRP), α(1)-antitrypsin and neutrophils/leucocytes, and sputum was analysed for biomarkers of neutrophil inflammation and remodelling activities, i.e. neutrophil elastase (NE) protein/activity and α(1)-antitrypsin. Levels of tumour necrosis factor-α (TNFα) were measured in both blood and sputum. Urine was collected 0-24 and 24-48 h postchallenge, and desmosine, a biomarker of elastin degradation, was measured. RESULTS: Lipopolysaccharide inhalation induced dose-dependent flu-like symptoms and increases in plasma CRP and α(1)-antitrypsin as well as increases in blood neutrophil/leucocyte numbers. Furthermore, LPS produced increases in sputum TNFα and sputum NE activity. Urine levels of desmosine were unaffected by the LPS challenge. All subjects recovered 48 h postchallenge, and indices of inflammatory activity were significantly lower at this observation point cf 24 h postchallenge. CONCLUSION: Inhalation of LPS in healthy volunteers can be used as a safe and stable model of neutrophil inflammation. Blood/plasma and sputum indices can be employed to monitor the response to LPS. We suggest that this model may be used for initial human studies of novel COPD-active drugs.

Natural allergen exposure does not diminish the sensitivity of cytokine production to glucocorticosteroids in blood cells of seasonal allergic asthma and rhinitis patients.

Glucocorticosteroid (GCS) inhibition of cytokine production is a major anti-inflammatory mechanism. However, increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines during allergic airway inflammation has been proposed to reduce GCS effects. This study aimed to investigate whether allergic airway inflammation due to natural allergen exposure might decrease the sensitivity of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production to GCS in blood cells. Blood samples were collected from patients with seasonal allergic asthma (n = 10) and rhinitis (n = 8) and healthy subjects (n = 9), before, during, and after the birch pollen season. Whole blood cultures were stimulated with LPS (10 ng/ml) and treated with budesonide (10(-11)-10(-7) M) for 20 h. GM-CSF levels were analysed using immunoassay. Birch pollen exposure did not alter LPS-stimulated GM-CSF production, although disease symptoms and blood eosinophils increased in the patients. There were no significant differences in budesonide inhibition of GM-CSF production by blood cells of asthma and rhinitis patients compared with cells of healthy subjects before, during or after the birch pollen season and no change in response to allergen exposure. A concentration of 1 nM budesonide inhibited GM-CSF production by more than 50% at all time points. In conclusion, natural allergen exposure did not reduce the sensitivity of GM-CSF production to GCS inhibition in blood cells of seasonal allergic asthma and rhinitis patients.