Efficacy of Balloon Tuboplasty for Baro-Challenge-Induced Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and a Retrospective Cohort Study of 39 Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Baro-challenge-induced Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) manifests due to inadequate Eustachian tube (ET) function during rapid ambient pressure changes, although ET function may be normal in normobaric situations. This systematic review and retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for the treatment of baro-challenge-induced ETD. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Helsinki University Hospital cohort. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in November 2020 and resulted in 174 articles. Eight articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Data was available altogether from 74 adult baro-challenge-induced ETD patients. In addition, we retrospectively evaluated 39 BET operations at Helsinki University Hospital from 2011 to 2020. Data from these 39 patients were collected from medical charts, and a questionnaire was sent to the patients. Meta-analysis was used to evaluate subjective symptom improvement, changes in ETD Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) scores, and Valsalva maneuver performance. RESULTS: In the systematic review, the outcome parameters varied between studies. Improvement was reported in subjective symptoms, Valsalva maneuver, ETDQ-7, tubomanometry, and pressure chamber test. Response rate for the Helsinki University Hospital cohort study was 72% (28/39). Mean follow-up time from the BET to the questionnaire was 4 years 8 months (SD 26months). Of those patients 93% (26/28) found the operation beneficial. Meta-analysis including up to 113 patients showed improvement in Valsalva maneuver, ETDQ-7, and improvement in subjective symptoms. Overall improvement in symptoms was noted in 81% of the patients. CONCLUSION: BET seems to be effective in the majority of patients with baro-challenge-induced ETD.

Tubomanometry correlations with patient characteristics and other diagnostic tests of Eustachian tube dysfunction: a cohort study of 432 ears.

OBJECTIVES: Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best protocol for diagnosing Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). We aimed to evaluate how patient characteristics affect tubomanometry (TMM) results. If an association between patient characteristics and TMM results exists, this should be considered in TMM interpretation. We also wanted to study if TMM correlates with other diagnostic tools of ETD. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients with TMM results available from November 2011 to October 2020 at a tertiary referral center, including 432 ears from 219 patients. An association between diagnostic tests and patient characteristics was assessed using regression models. Spearman's rank correlation was used to analyze correlations between diagnostic tests. RESULTS: None of the studied patient characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, smoking, sinonasal disease) was associated with TMM results except for pollen allergy (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.15-2.63, P = 0.009). TMM results correlated with Valsalva maneuver performance (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.31) and otomicroscopic signs of inadequate middle ear ventilation (P < 0.001, ρ = 0.28). The Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score did not correlate with any diagnostic method. CONCLUSIONS: TMM results are unaffected by patient characteristics other than pollen allergy. Thus, TMM may be used in ETD diagnostics in a wide variety of patients with straightforward interpretation. TMM correlates with other diagnostic tests studied but not with ETDQ-7. ETDQ-7 does not seem to correlate with other diagnostic tests and appears nonspecific in ETD diagnostics.

Inner ear barotrauma and inner ear decompression sickness: a systematic review on differential diagnostics.

INTRODUCTION: Inner ear barotrauma (IEBt) and inner ear decompression sickness (IEDCS) are the two dysbaric inner ear injuries associated with diving. Both conditions manifest as cochleovestibular symptoms, causing difficulties in differential diagnosis and possibly delaying (or leading to inappropriate) treatment. METHODS: This was a systematic review of IEBt and IEDCS cases aiming to define diving and clinical variables that help differentiate these conditions. The search strategy consisted of a preliminary search, followed by a systematic search covering three databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus). Studies were included when published in English and adequately reporting one or more IEBt or IEDCS patients in diving. Concerns regarding missing and duplicate data were minimised by contacting original authors when necessary. RESULTS: In total, 25 studies with IEBt patients (n = 183) and 18 studies with IEDCS patients (n = 397) were included. Variables most useful in differentiating between IEBt and IEDCS were dive type (free diving versus scuba diving), dive gas (compressed air versus mixed gas), dive profile (mean depth 13 versus 43 metres of seawater), symptom onset (when descending versus when ascending or surfacing), distribution of cochleovestibular symptoms (vestibular versus cochlear) and absence or presence of other DCS symptoms. Symptoms of difficult middle ear equalisation or findings consistent with middle ear barotrauma could not be reliably assessed in this context, being insufficiently reported in the IEDCS literature. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple useful variables to help distinguish IEBt from IEDCS. Symptoms of difficult middle ear equalisation or findings consistent with middle ear barotrauma require further study as means of distinguishing IEBt and IEDCS.

Inner ear decompression sickness in Finland: a retrospective 20-year multicenter study.

Introduction: Inner ear decompression sickness (IEDCS) is a condition from which only a minority of patients recover completely, the majority ending up with mild to moderate residual symptoms. IEDCS has been reported after deep technical dives using mixed breathing gases, and moderate recreational dives with compressed air as the breathing gas. Considering this and the high proportion of technical diving in Finland, a comparison between IEDCS cases resulting from technical and recreational dives is warranted. Methods: This is a retrospective examination of IEDCS patients treated at Hyperbaric Center Medioxygen or National Hyperbaric Centre of Turku University Hospital from 1999 to 2018. Patients were included if presenting with hearing loss, tinnitus, or vertigo and excluded if presenting only with symptoms of middle ear or cerebellar involvement. Patients were divided into technical and recreational divers, based on incident dive. Results: A total of 89 (15.6%) of all DCS patients presented with IEDCS, two-thirds treated during the latter decade. The most common predisposing factors were consecutive days of diving (47.2%), multiple dives per day (53.9%), and factors related to an increase in intrathoracic pressure (27.0%). The symptoms were cochlear in 19.1% and vestibular in 93.3% of cases, symptoms being more common and severe in technical divers. Complete recovery was achieved in 64.5% of technical and 71.4% of recreational divers. Conclusion: The incidence of IEDCS in Finland is increasing, most likely due to changing diving practices. A comprehensive examination should be carried out after an incident of IEDCS in all cases, irrespective of clinical recovery.

Sinus Barotraumas in Commercial Aircrew.

BACKGROUND: Sinus barotraumas are a common condition in aviation medicine, sometimes compromising flight safety and even permanently grounding aircrew. Considering this and the ever-increasing amount of commercial aviation, a thorough examination is required.METHODS: In this survey study, an anonymous, electronic questionnaire was distributed to commercial aircrew of the three major commercial airlines operating in Finland (N 3799), covering 93% of the target population (i.e., all commercial aircrew operating in Finland, N 4083). Primary outcomes were self-reported prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health and occupational effects of sinus barotraumas in flight. Secondary outcomes were adjusted odds ratios (OR) for frequency of sinus barotraumas with respect to possible risk factors.RESULTS: Response rate was 47% (N 1789/3799), with 61% (N 1088) of the respondents having experienced sinus barotraumas in flight. Of those affected, 59% had used medications, 18% had undergone surgical procedures, and 53% had been on sick leave due to sinus barotraumas (38% during the last year) in flight. Factors associated with sinus barotraumas were female sex [OR, 2.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.354.50] and a high number of upper respiratory tract infections (3 vs. <3 URTIs/yr: OR, 3.61; 95% CI 2.654.93).CONCLUSION: Sinus barotraumas were reported by 61% of commercial aircrew. They caused an increased need for medications, otorhinolaryngology-related surgical procedures, and sickness absence from flight duty. The possible risk factors were female sex and a high number of URTIs/yr.Lindfors OH, Ketola KS, Klockars TK, Leino TK, Sinkkonen ST. Sinus barotraumas in commercial aircrew. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(11):857-863.

Sinus barotrauma in diving.

INTRODUCTION: Sinus barotrauma is a common occurrence in diving and subaquatic medicine, potentially compromising dive safety. To gain a more thorough understanding of the condition, an in-depth investigation is justified. METHODS: This was a survey study. An anonymous, electronic questionnaire was distributed to 7,060 recipients: professional divers of the Finnish Border Guard, the Finnish Rescue Services, and the Finnish Heritage agency, as well as recreational divers registered as members of the Finnish Divers' Association reachable by email (roughly two-thirds of all members and recreational divers in Finland). Primary outcomes were self-reported prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health effects of sinus barotrauma while diving. Secondary outcomes were adjusted odds ratios (OR) for frequency of sinus barotrauma with respect to possible risk factors. RESULTS: In total, 1,881 respondents participated in the study (response rate 27%). A total of 49% of the respondents had experienced sinus barotrauma while diving and of those affected, 32% had used medications to alleviate their symptoms. The factors associated with sinus barotrauma were pollen allergies (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.10-2.29), regular smoking (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.07-3.91) and a high number of upper respiratory tract infections per year (≥ 3 vs. < 3 infections per year: OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.79-4.24). CONCLUSIONS: Sinus barotrauma is the second most common condition encountered in diving medicine, having affected 49% of the respondents. Possible risk factors include allergies to pollen, regular smoking, and a high number of URTIs per year.

Middle Ear Barotraumas in Commercial Aircrew.

BACKGROUND: Middle ear (ME) barotraumas are the most common condition in aviation medicine, sometimes seriously compromising flight safety. Considering this and the ever-increasing amount of commercial aviation, a detailed overview is warranted.METHODS: In this survey study, an anonymous, electronic questionnaire was distributed to commercial aircrew of the three major commercial airlines operating in Finland (N 3799), covering 93% of the target population (i.e., all commercial aircrew operating in Finland, N 4083). Primary outcomes were self-reported prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health and occupational effects of ME barotraumas in flight. Secondary outcomes were adjusted odds ratios (OR) for frequency of ME barotraumas with respect to possible risk factors.RESULTS: Response rate was 47% (N 1789/3799), with 85% (N 1516) having experienced ME barotraumas in flight. Of those affected, 60% had used medications, 5% had undergone surgical procedures, and 48% had been on sick leave due to ME barotraumas (40% during the last year). Factors associated with ME barotraumas included a high number of upper respiratory tract infections [3 URTIs/yr vs. 0 URTIs/yr: OR, 9.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9920.39] and poor subjective performance in Valsalva (occasionally vs. always successful: OR, 7.84; 95% CI 3.9715.51) and Toynbee (occasionally vs. always successful: OR, 9.06; 95% CI 2.6730.78) maneuvers.CONCLUSION: ME barotraumas were reported by 85% of commercial aircrew. They lead to an increased need for medications, otorhinolaryngology-related surgical procedures, and sickness absence from flight duty. Possible risk factors include a high number of URTIs and poor performance in pressure equalization maneuvers.Lindfors OH, Ketola KS, Klockars TK, Leino TK, Sinkkonen ST. Middle ear barotraumas in commercial aircrew. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(3):182189.

Middle ear barotrauma in diving.

INTRODUCTION: Middle ear barotrauma (MEBt) is the most common medical complication in diving, posing a serious risk to dive safety. Given this prevalence and the continuing growth of the diving industry, a comprehensive overview of the condition is warranted. METHODS: This was a survey study. An anonymous, electronic questionnaire was distributed to 7,060 recipients: professional divers of the Finnish Border Guard, the Finnish Rescue Services, and the Finnish Heritage agency; and recreational divers registered as members of the Finnish Divers' Association reachable by e-mail (roughly two-thirds of all members and recreational divers in Finland). Primary outcomes were self-reported prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health effects of MEBt while diving. Secondary outcomes were adjusted odds ratios (OR) for frequency of MEBt with respect to possible risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 1,881 respondents participated in the study (response rate 27%). In total, 81% of the respondents had experienced MEBt while diving. Of those affected, 38% had used medications and 1% had undergone otorhinolaryngology-related surgical procedures due to MEBt. Factors most associated with MEBt were poor subjective success in Valsalva ('occasionally' versus 'always' successful: OR 11.56; 95% CI 7.24-18.47) and Toynbee ('occasionally' versus 'always' successful: OR 3.51; 95% CI 1.95-6.30) manoeuvres. CONCLUSIONS: MEBt is common in both recreational and professional divers, having affected 81% of the respondents. The main possible risk factors include poor success in pressure equalisation manoeuvres.

Tubomanometry Measurement Success Rate in Clinical Practice.

OBJECTIVES: Tubomanometry (TMM) is an objective method for investigating Eustachian tube (ET) function, but difficulties in technique and interpretation may reduce its usability. The objective of our study was to investigate common difficulties with TMM in different ET dysfunction (ETD) patient groups and at different pressures (30, 40, and 50 mbars) when first introducing TMM to otologic practice. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate whether it would be possible to perform TMM at only one pressure and obtain a representative result. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a 2-year cohort of 114 patients with a history of ETD treated at a tertiary referral center. Primary outcome was the success rate of TMM, secondary the reasons for unsuccessful measurements. Tertiary outcome was the correlation of TMM results at adjacent pressures. RESULTS: TMM success rate was 91%, varying 81 to 94% in different ETD patient groups and 87 to 94% at different pressures. Unsuccessful measurements resulted from air-leaks from the external ear canal, abnormal ear canal pressure curves (R < 0) and at 50 mbar, difficulties in reaching sufficient nasopharyngeal pressure. TMM results were similar in 88% of cases at 30 and 40 mbars and in 86% of cases at 40 and 50 mbars. CONCLUSIONS: TMM success rate seems sufficiently high for clinical diagnostics, and most difficulties may be overcome with proper interpretation during the TMM measurement session, and thus repeating the measurements when necessary. Considering the diagnostic information that would be lost if using only a single, predefined pressure, we suggest using all three pressures.