Group B or not group B? An association between ABO, early mortality, and organ dysfunction in major trauma patients with shock.

BACKGROUND: ABO blood group alters coagulation profiles in the general population and may influence outcomes after trauma. The relationship between trauma-induced coagulopathy, severe injury with hemorrhagic shock, and survival with respect to ABO group is unknown. OBJECTIVES: In severe hemorrhagic trauma, we aimed to characterize the association of ABO group with admission coagulation profiles, mortality, and immune-mediated complications. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory variables were examined from severely injured adult patients enrolled in a perpetual observational cohort study at a UK Major Trauma Center. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine differences in clinical outcomes (mortality, organ dysfunction, and critical care support). In a shock subgroup, we performed an exploratory analysis of rotational thromboelastometry parameters and coagulation biomarkers. RESULTS: In 1119 trauma patients, we found no difference in mortality between ABO groups. In patients with shock, 24-hour mortality was significantly lower in group B vs non-B groups (7% vs 16%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.19; P = .030), but there were increased rates of invasive ventilation (aOR, 3.34; P = .033), renal replacement therapy (aOR, 2.55; P = .037), and a trend for infection (aOR, 1.85; P = .067). Comparing patients with shock, group B vs non-B patients had 40% higher fibrinogen, 65% higher factor (F) VIII, 36% higher FIX, 20% higher FXIII, and 19% higher von Willebrand factor. CONCLUSION: In this observational study limited by single time-point sampling and subgroup analysis of trauma hemorrhage with shock, group B patients have enhanced hemostatic capability associated with early survival but with increased risk of immune-mediated complications.

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) for treatment of trauma-induced coagulopathy: systematic review and meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is common in trauma patients with major hemorrhage. Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is used as a potential treatment for the correction of TIC, but the efficacy, timing, and evidence to support its use in injured patients with hemorrhage are unclear. METHODS: A systematic search of published studies was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases using standardized search equations. Ongoing studies were identified using clinicaltrials.gov. Studies investigating the use of PCC to treat TIC (on its own or in combination with other treatments) in adult major trauma patients were included. Studies involving pediatric patients, studies of only traumatic brain injury (TBI), and studies involving only anticoagulated patients were excluded. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Pooled effects of PCC use were reported using random-effects model meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed for each study, and we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: After removing duplicates, 1745 reports were screened and nine observational studies and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) were included, with a total of 1150 patients receiving PCC. Most studies used 4-factor-PCC with a dose of 20-30U/Kg. Among observational studies, co-interventions included whole blood (n = 1), fibrinogen concentrate (n = 2), or fresh frozen plasma (n = 4). Outcomes were inconsistently reported across studies with wide variation in both measurements and time points. The eight observational studies included reported mortality with a pooled odds ratio of 0.97 [95% CI 0.56-1.69], and five reported deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with a pooled OR of 0.83 [95% CI 0.44-1.57]. When pooling the observational studies and the RCT, the OR for mortality and DVT was 0.94 [95% CI 0.60-1.45] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.64-1.55] respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among published studies of TIC, PCCs did not significantly reduce mortality, nor did they increase the risk of VTE. However, the potential thrombotic risk remains a concern that should be addressed in future studies. Several RCTs are currently ongoing to further explore the efficacy and safety of PCC.