Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(1): e2032207, 2021 01 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33475755

ABSTRACT

Importance: Primary medical and dental clinics may accept fewer people who are deaf as patients than persons who can hear, and clinics may deny requests by patients who are deaf for American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation at appointments when necessary, creating diminished access to primary medical and dental care. Objective: To compare the rate at which patients who are deaf are offered primary care medical or dental appointments with the rate at which appointments are offered to patients who can hear in a real-world context. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a simulated patient (SP) call audit method. Simulated patients (4 who could hear and 4 who were deaf) followed a call script in which an adult sought to establish care, requesting new patient appointments from a statewide stratified random sample of clinicians listed in the Idaho Medical and Dental Associations member databases at 445 clinics (334 primary care and 111 general dentistry) throughout Idaho. Simulated patients who were deaf also requested interpreting services at the appointment. Calls were made between June 7 and December 6, 2018. Data analysis was conducted from December 2019 to April 2020. Exposures: Simulated patients who were deaf or could hear called primary care medical or dental clinics from the sampling frame and requested an appointment, supplying the same basic information. In addition, SPs who were deaf requested that an ASL interpreter be provided by the clinic for the appointment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of new appointments offered and, for SPs who were deaf, whether ASL interpreter services were confirmed for the appointment. Results: Two male and 2 female SPs who could hear were successful on 210 occasions (64.4%) when requesting a new patient appointment compared with 2 male and 2 female SPs who were deaf who were successful on 161 occasions (49.1%) (P < .001). Simulated patients who could hear were nearly 2 times more likely to secure appointments than were SPs who were deaf (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.79). For SPs who were deaf, 80 unsuccessful appointment requests (48.2%) were associated with a request for interpretation. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that in a statewide representative sample, access to primary medical and dental care for patients who are deaf is significantly reduced. Patients who are deaf may not receive an appointment if they request interpreter services, even when such services are required to provide effective communication.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Deafness , Dental Care , Health Services Accessibility , Primary Health Care , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Idaho , Male , Patient Simulation
2.
Glob Pediatr Health ; 6: 2333794X19847911, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106248

ABSTRACT

This study uses a secondary analysis of the 2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN) to describe care coordination (CC) for children with medical complexity (CMC). Chi-square test, t test, and multivariate logistic regression statistical tests are used to determine the relationships and differences between sources of CC and factors associated with receiving clinic-based CC for CMC and their family. Among CMC, 66.47% received no CC support and 25.73% received clinic-based CC. In multivariate models, families reporting dissatisfaction with communication between health care providers or reporting family-centered care were less likely to receive clinic-based CC. Families were more likely to receive clinic-based CC if they had younger children, lower household income, and greater school absenteeism. Clinic-based CC is associated with improved communication between health providers but must become more family-centered and minimize student absenteeism for the CMC population.

3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (6): CD011120, 2016 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27292836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use is highly prevalent amongst people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and has a substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions to motivate and assist tobacco use cessation for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), and to evaluate the risks of any harms associated with those interventions. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO in June 2015. We also searched EThOS, ProQuest, four clinical trial registries, reference lists of articles, and searched for conference abstracts using Web of Science and handsearched speciality conference databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials of behavioural or pharmacological interventions for tobacco cessation for PLWHA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted all data using a standardised electronic data collection form. They extracted data on the nature of the intervention, participants, and proportion achieving abstinence and they contacted study authors to obtain missing information. We collected data on long-term (greater than or equal to six months) and short-term (less than six months) outcomes. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis and estimated the pooled effects using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect method. Two authors independently assessed and reported the risk of bias according to prespecified criteria. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 14 studies relevant to this review, of which we included 12 in a meta-analysis (n = 2087). All studies provided an intervention combining behavioural support and pharmacotherapy, and in most studies this was compared to a less intensive control, typically comprising a brief behavioural intervention plus pharmacotherapy.There was moderate quality evidence from six studies for the long-term abstinence outcome, which showed no evidence of effect for more intense cessation interventions: (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.39) with no evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%). The pooled long-term abstinence was 8% in both intervention and control conditions. There was very low quality evidence from 11 studies that more intense tobacco cessation interventions were effective in achieving short-term abstinence (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.00); there was moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 42%). Abstinence in the control group at short-term follow-up was 8% (n = 67/848) and in the intervention group was 13% (n = 118/937). The effect of tailoring the intervention for PLWHA was unclear. We further investigated the effect of intensity of behavioural intervention via number of sessions and total duration of contact. We failed to detect evidence of a difference in effect according to either measure of intensity, although there were few studies in each subgroup. It was not possible to perform the planned analysis of adverse events or HIV outcomes since these were not reported in more than one study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate quality evidence that combined tobacco cessation interventions provide similar outcomes to controls in PLWHA in the long-term. There is very low quality evidence that combined tobacco cessation interventions were effective in helping PLWHA achieve short-term abstinence. Despite this, tobacco cessation interventions should be offered to PLWHA, since even non-sustained periods of abstinence have proven benefits. Further large, well designed studies of cessation interventions for PLWHA are needed.


Subject(s)
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , HIV Infections , Tobacco Use Cessation/methods , Behavior Therapy/methods , Humans , Nicotinic Agonists/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Smoking Cessation/methods , Time Factors , Varenicline/therapeutic use
4.
Tob Control ; 25(2): 224-31, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Secondhand smoke (SHS) likely provides additional exposure to nicotine and toxins for smokers, but has been understudied. Our objective was to determine whether SHS exposure among smokers yields detectable differences in cotinine levels compared with unexposed smokers at the population level. METHODS: Using the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 1999-2012, we compared serum cotinine levels of 4547 current adult cigarette smokers stratified by self-reported SHS exposure sources (home and/or work) and smoking intensity. A weighted multivariable linear regression model determined the association between SHS exposure and cotinine levels among smokers. RESULTS: Smokers with SHS exposure at home (43.8%) had higher cotinine levels (ß=0.483, p≤0.001) compared with those with no SHS exposure at home after controlling for the number of cigarettes smoked per day and number of days smoked in the previous 5 days, survey year, age, gender and education. Smokers with SHS exposure at work (20.0%) did not have significantly higher cotinine levels after adjustment. The adjusted geometric mean cotinine levels of light smokers (1-9 cigarettes per day) with no SHS exposure, exposure at work only, home only, and both home and work were 52.0, 62.7, 67.2, 74.4 ng/mL, respectively, compared with 219.4, 220.9, 255.2, 250.5 ng/mL among moderate/heavy smokers (≥10 cigarettes per day). CONCLUSIONS: Smokers living in residences where others smoke inside the home had significantly higher cotinine levels than smokers reporting no SHS exposure, regardless of individual smoking intensity. Future research should target the role that SHS exposure may have in nicotine dependence, cessation outcomes and other health impacts among smokers.


Subject(s)
Cotinine/blood , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/blood , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Housing , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Linear Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Nutrition Surveys , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Smoking/ethnology , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Workplace , Young Adult
5.
Int J Alcohol Drug Res ; 4(2): 159-169, 2015 Dec 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34531935

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Risk environment factors may influence unprotected sex between female sex workers who are also injection drug users (FSW-IDUs) and their regular and non-regular clients differently. Our objective is to identify correlates of unprotected vaginal sex in the context of client type. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 583 FSW-IDUs in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, was analyzed using negative binomial regression to determine physical, social, economic, and policy risk-environment factors that affect the frequency of unprotected sex with regular and non-regular clients. RESULTS: Median number of unprotected vaginal sex acts in the past month among FSW-IDUs and their regular and non-regular clients was 11 (IQR 3-30) and 13 (IQR 5-30), respectively. Correlates differed by site and client type and were most closely associated with the risk environment. In Tijuana, social factors (e.g., injecting drugs with clients) were independently associated with more unprotected sex. Factors independently associated with less unprotected sex across client type and site included social and economic risk environment factors (e.g., receiving more money for unprotected sex). In the policy risk environment, always having free access to condoms was independently associated with less unprotected sex among non-regular clients in Tijuana (Risk rate ratio = 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Primarily physical, social, and economic risk-environment factors were associated with unprotected vaginal sex between FSW-IDUs and both client types, suggesting potential avenues for intervention.

6.
PLoS One ; 9(3): e93137, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24664240

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few studies assessing the relationship between active and passive smoking and tuberculosis have used biomarkers to measure smoke exposure. We sought to determine the association between active and passive smoking and LTBI in a representative sample of US adults and children. METHODS: We used the 1999-2000 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset with tuberculin skin test (TST) data to assess the association between cotinine-confirmed smoke exposure and latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) among adults ages ≥20 years (n = 3598) and children 3-19 years (n = 2943) and estimate the prevalence of smoke exposure among those with LTBI. Weighted multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the associations between active and passive smoking and LTBI. RESULTS: LTBI prevalence in 1999-2000 among cotinine-confirmed active, passive, and non-smoking adults and children was 6.0%, 5.2%, 3.3% and 0.3%, 1.0%, 1.5%, respectively. This corresponds to approximately 3,556,000 active and 3,379,000 passive smoking adults with LTBI in the US civilian non-institutionalized population in 1999-2000. Controlling for age, gender, socioeconomic status, race, birthplace (US vs. foreign-born), household size, and having ever lived with someone with TB, adult active smokers were significantly more likely to have LTBI than non-smoking adults (AOR = 2.31 95% CI 1.17-4.55). Adult passive smokers also had a greater odds of LTBI compared with non-smokers, but this association did not achieve statistical significance (AOR = 2.00 95% CI 0.87-4.60). Neither active or passive smoking was associated with LTBI among children. Among only the foreign-born adults, both active (AOR = 2.56 (95% CI 1.20-5.45) and passive smoking (AOR = 2.27 95% CI 1.09-4.72) were significantly associated with LTBI. CONCLUSIONS: Active adult smokers and both foreign-born active and passive smokers in the United States are at elevated risk for LTBI. Targeted smoking prevention and cessation programs should be included in comprehensive national and international TB control efforts.


Subject(s)
Latent Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Tobacco Smoke Pollution , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Smoking Prevention , United States/epidemiology
7.
Tob Control ; 20 Suppl 1: i21-4, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21504920

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To better estimate the burden of toxic cigarette butt waste and create awareness of the hazardous nature of cigarette butts on two large university campuses in San Diego by organizing and conducting student cigarette butt clean-up activities. METHODS: Two separate campus-wide clean-ups were conducted by student volunteers at San Diego State University (SDSU) and at University of California San Diego (UCSD) between April and July 2010. RESULTS: In 1 h, 63 volunteers at SDSU collected 23,885 butts; 6525 cigarette butts were collected in 1 h by 17 volunteers at UCSD. The average number of cigarette butts picked up per individual was 379.1 at SDSU and 383.8 at UCSD (range 25-1030 per volunteer). CONCLUSIONS: The amount of cigarette waste on college campuses nationally may be quite substantial given the many thousands of cigarette butts gathered at each of the San Diego institutions. In just 10 s on average a volunteer could locate, walk to, pick up and put a cigarette butt in the collection bag and then begin looking for another discarded butt, indicating the saturation of cigarette butts on campus. Smoke-free policies on campus could have far-reaching effects not only in reducing smoking behaviour on campus and ground clean-up costs, but also on the environment. Campus cigarette waste clean-ups can be utilized to call attention to the issue of cigarette butt waste in the environment.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Hazardous Substances , Smoking , Universities , Adult , California , Hazardous Waste , Humans , Policy , Smoking Cessation , Students , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...