Imaging cognitive fatigability in multiple sclerosis: objective quantification of cerebral blood flow during a task of sustained attention using ASL perfusion fMRI.

Cognitive fatigability (CF) can be defined as an inability to maintain performance throughout a sustained cognitive task. Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are more susceptible to CF than healthy controls (HCs); however, the neural correlates underlying CF are still under investigation. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging provides a non-invasive method of objectively quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) during sustained attention tasks. To date, no study has yet evaluated CF in MS using this methodology. 10 MS and 10 HCs completed a 20-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). CF was evaluated by dividing the PVT into quintiles and examining performance from the 1st to the last. Mean reaction times (RTs) and number of lapses were recorded. Global and regional CBF changes were evaluated throughout the PVT as well as during pre- and post-task rest. Increased susceptibility to CF was noted in the MS group. Distinct patterns of CBF activation were observed in areas comprising fronto-parietal, cortico-striatal, cerebellar, and basal ganglia regions; however, when and how these regions were engaged differed between the MS and HC groups. In particular, dysfunction in CBF to the middle frontal gyrus may underlie the CF effects observed. In addition, individuals with MS appear to struggle with "switching off" regions of the attentional network at rest following sustained cognitive effort. Findings support the use of ASL as an appropriate methodology for evaluating CF in MS with an overall pattern of attentional network dysfunction being observed. Objectively quantifying CF in this manner can help validate patients' subjective complaints.

Cognitive Fatigability Interventions in Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Although fatigue is a well-studied concept in neurological disease, cognitive fatigability (CF) is less understood. While most studies measure fatigue using subjective self-report, fewer have measured CF objectively. Given the negative impact of CF on quality-of-life, there is a need for targeted interventions. The objective of this review was to determine which procedural, behavioural and pharmacological treatments for objectively measured CF are available to people living with neurological conditions. METHODS: In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches for randomized control trials (RCTs), case-controlled studies and case reports/series were conducted across the Ovid Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. English-language articles published between 1980 and February 2019 were considered for eligibility. Included were those that objectively measured CF in individuals with neurological disease/disorder/dysfunction between the ages of 18 and 65 years. Studies were reviewed using a modified Cochrane Data Extraction Template. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The review process was facilitated using Covidence software (www.covidence.org). Two authors reviewed articles independently, with a third resolving conflicts regarding article inclusion. RESULTS: The search identified 450 records. After duplicates were removed and remaining titles/abstracts were screened for eligibility, 28 full-text articles were assessed, and two studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Studies were a priori divided into those with pharmacological, procedural or behavioural interventions. Two studies met eligibility criteria; both of these included participants with multiple sclerosis. One study utilized a procedural intervention (i.e. transcranial direct current stimulation), while the other utilized a pharmacological intervention (i.e. fampridine-SR). Studies were evaluated for risk of bias, and evidence from both eligible studies was discussed. CONCLUSION: Despite the positive results of the procedural intervention, the paucity of eligible studies and the nascent nature of the field suggests that more studies are required before firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the amenability of CF to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019118706).