Derivation of a risk assessment tool for emergency department patients with sickle cell disease.

INTRODUCTION: Sickle cell patients commonly present to the emergency department (ED). Identifying those requiring admission and those who can safely be discharged is difficult. It was hypothesised that ED variables predictive of 96-h adverse sickle cell patient outcomes are identifiable. METHODS: This observational cohort study included all adult sickle cell patient visits (1 June 2004-31 May 2005) to two ED. Patients were identified by ICD-9 codes of vaso-occlusive crisis and lists from treating haematologists. ED charts were abstracted for history, physical examination, laboratory/imaging data and outcomes. Outcomes were hospitalisation within 96 h of ED presentation for transfusion/antibiotic treatment, acute chest syndrome, or aplastic or sequestration crisis. Logistic regression was used to derive a risk score, which was tested in a validation cohort. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to measure score performance. RESULTS: There were 884 ED visits by 125 patients (mean age 36 years/55% female/58% homozygous sickle cell disease). 199 ED visits had one or more outcome (197 transfusion/antibiotic treatment, 71 acute chest syndrome, and one aplastic crisis). The risk score included sickle variant, chest pain, chills, pain dissimilar to past, temperature (<36 degrees C/>38 degrees C), oxygen saturation (<95%), haemoglobin (<10 g/dl), urine nitrites and chest x ray abnormality. The score had an AUC of 0.816 (95% CI 0.778 to 0.854) in the derivation cohort, 0.824 (95% CI 0.760 to 0.889) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: Those ED variables predictive of 96-h adverse sickle cell patient outcomes can be identified and combined into a risk score. Prospective validation is necessary before any clinical decision-making based on this score.

Initial risk stratification and presenting characteristics of patients with evolving myocardial infarctions.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the presenting characteristics and risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who have a normal initial troponin level followed by a raised troponin level within 12 h (evolving myocardial infarction (EMI)). METHODS: Data from the Internet Tracking Registry for Acute Coronary Syndromes (i*trACS), a registry of patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain, were used. This analysis included patients without ST segment elevation with at least two troponin assay results < or = 12 h apart. Patients were stratified into three groups: EMI (initial troponin assay negative, second troponin assay positive), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (initial troponin assay positive) and no MI (all troponin assays negative). RESULTS: Of 4136 eligible patients, 5% had EMI, 8% had NSTEMI and 87% had no MI. Patients with EMI were more similar to those with NSTEMI than those with no MI with respect to demographic characteristics, presentation, admission patterns and revascularisation. The initial ECG in patients with EMI was most commonly non-diagnostic (51%), but physicians' initial impressions commonly reflected MI, unstable angina or high-risk chest pain (76%). This risk assessment was followed by a high rate of critical care admissions (32%) and revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention 17%) among patients with EMI. CONCLUSION: Patients with EMI appear similar at presentation to those with NSTEMI. Patients with EMI are perceived as being at high risk, evidenced by similar diagnostic impressions, admission practices and revascularisation rates to patients with NSTEMI.

Comparison of characteristics of admitted emergency department patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU and non-ICU setting.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalised patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have better outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs) than wards. Survival could potentially be improved for patients at high risk for CPR if they can be identified while in the emergency department (ED) and admitted to an ICU setting. It is currently unknown whether patients requiring CPR who are admitted to the ward show a similar pattern of physiological deterioration to those admitted to the ICU, and thus whether future research should consider these two patients groups as distinct. It is hypothesised that, since both groups of patients decompensate to the point of requiring acute resuscitation shortly after hospital admission, they should also share similar premonitory signs of deterioration in their basic physiological parameters. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of adult patients at an urban ED requiring CPR within 72 h of admission from March 2002 to March 2005. Data were compared between subjects admitted to ICU and non-ICU beds. RESULTS: 45 patients (58% women) of mean age 59 years met the inclusion criteria; 40% required CPR in a non-ICU ward. There were no differences in demographic characteristics, ED chief complaint or admission diagnosis between the two groups. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the non-ICU subjects at ED arrival (129/75 vs 100/50), time of admission (122/74 vs 103/58) and before CPR (117/70 vs 92/50) (p

Interpretation of the finger skin temperature response to cold provocation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare alternative methods of interpreting the response of finger skin temperature (FST) to cold provocation for the detection of the abnormal cold response observed in vibration-induced white finger (VWF). METHOD: The FST response to cold provocation was measured in 36 male subjects: 12 office workers, 12 manual workers and 12 manual workers with symptoms of VWF. The FSTs were monitored continuously on the distal phalanges of all five fingers of a test hand for 2 min before, for 5 min during, and for 10 min following, immersion of the test hand in water at 15 degrees C. Of the fingers investigated, 147 were reported not to exhibit blanching and 33 were reported to exhibit blanching. Twenty-one alternative methods of interpreting the response of FSTs to cold provocation were assessed. These were grouped as: (1) areas above the response profile (i.e. the area above the curve showing the FSTs as a function of time during cooling and recovery), (2) areas below the response profile, (3) absolute temperatures during and following cold provocation, (4) percentage differences in FSTs, (5) the times taken for FSTs to rise by specified amounts and (6) rates of change of FSTs. Differences in the response to cooling between those fingers reported to blanch and the fingers not reported to blanch were tested, and receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the various measures to symptoms of VWF. RESULTS: The areas above the response profile, areas below the response profile, percentage FSTs, absolute FSTs and rates of change of FSTs tended to discriminate between healthy and unhealthy subjects on a group basis. However, some of these methods of interpreting the FST response to cold provocation did not show a high sensitivity or specificity to vascular dysfunction on individual fingers. The area above the response profile, the percentage of initial temperature at the fifth minute of recovery and the maximum temperature during the 10-min recovery period, were found to show the highest sensitivity and specificity to symptoms of vascular dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The method chosen to interpret the FST response to cold provocation affects the ability of the test to detect an abnormal cold response. The area above the response profile, the percentage of initial temperature at the fifth minute of recovery and the maximum temperature achieved during a 10-min recovery period appear to be the most suitable measures for monitoring vascular function in workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration. It is suggested that the FST response to cold provocation should be interpreted with respect to the state of initial blood flow.

Response of finger circulation to energy equivalent combinations of magnitude and duration of vibration.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acute response of finger circulation to vibration with different combinations of magnitude and duration but with the same "energy equivalent" acceleration magnitude according to current standards for hand transmitted vibration. METHODS: Finger skin temperature (FST) and finger blood flow (FBF) were measured in the middle fingers of both hands of 10 healthy men who had not used hand held vibrating tools regularly. With a static load of 10 N, the right hand was exposed to 125 Hz vibration with the following unweighted root mean square (rms) acceleration magnitudes and durations of exposure: 44 m/s(2) for 30 minutes; 62 m/s(2) for 15 minutes; 88 m/s(2) for 7.5 minutes; 125 m/s(2) for 3.75 minutes; and 176 m/s(2) for 1.88 minutes. These vibration exposures produce the same 8 hour energy equivalent frequency weighted acceleration magnitude (approximately 1.4 m/s(2) rms) according to international standard ISO 5349 (1986). Finger circulation was measured in both the right (vibrated) and the left (non-vibrated) middle fingers before application of the vibration, and at fixed intervals during exposure to vibration and during a 45 minute recovery period. RESULTS: The FST did not change during exposure to vibration, whereas vibration with any combination of acceleration magnitude and duration produced significant percentage reductions in the FBF of the vibrated finger compared with the FBF before exposure (from -40.1% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) -24.3% to -57.2%) to -61.4% (95% CI -45.0% to -77.8%). The reduction in FBF during vibration was stronger in the vibrated finger than in the non-vibrated finger. Across the five experimental conditions, the various vibration stimuli caused a similar degree of vasoconstriction in the vibrated finger during exposure to vibration. There was a progressive decrease in the FBF of both fingers after the end of exposure to vibration with acceleration magnitudes of 44 m/s(2) for 30 minutes and 62 m/s(2) for 15 minutes. Significant vasoconstrictor after effects were not found in either finger after exposure to any of the other vibration stimuli with greater acceleration magnitudes for shorter durations. CONCLUSIONS: For the range of vibration magnitudes investigated (44 to 176 m/s(2) rms unweighted; 5.5 to 22 m/s(2) rms when frequency weighted according to ISO 5349), the vasoconstriction during exposure to 125 Hz vibration was independent of vibration magnitude. The after effect of vibration was different for stimuli with the same energy equivalent acceleration, with greater effects after longer durations of exposure. The energy equivalent acceleration therefore failed to predict the acute effects of vibration both during and after exposure to vibration. Both central and local vasoregulatory mechanisms are likely to be involved in the response of finger circulation to acute exposures to 125 Hz vibration.

Acute vascular responses to the frequency of vibration transmitted to the hand.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acute effects of the frequency of hand transmitted vibration on finger circulation. A further aim was to investigate whether the frequency weighting assumed in current standards for hand transmitted vibration reflects the haemodynamic changes which occur in the fingers exposed to vibration with different frequencies but with the same frequency weighted acceleration magnitude. METHODS: Finger skin temperature (FST) and finger blood flow (FBF) were measured in the middle fingers of both hands of 10 healthy men. With a static load of 10 N, the right hand was exposed for 15 minutes to the following root mean square (rms) acceleration magnitudes and frequencies of vertical vibration: 5.5 m/s(2) at 16 Hz; 11 m/s(2) at 31.5 Hz; 22 m/s(2) at 63 Hz; 44 m/s(2) at 125 Hz; and 88 m/s(2) at 250 Hz. These exposures to vibration produce the same frequency weighted acceleration magnitude (5.5 m/s(2) rms) according to the frequency weighting included in the international standard ISO 5349. A control condition consisted of exposure to the static load only. Finger circulation was measured before application of the vibration and static load and at fixed intervals during exposure to vibration and a 45 minute recovery period. RESULTS: No significant changes in finger circulation were found with only the static load. The FST did not change significantly during or after acute exposure to vibration. In the vibrated right finger, exposures to vibration with frequencies of 31. 5-250 Hz provoked a greater reduction in FBF than did vibration of 16 Hz or the static load only. In the non-vibrated left finger, the FBF measured with vibration at each frequency of 63-250 Hz was significantly lower than that measured with static load only. The reduction in FBF during exposure to vibration with any frequency was stronger in the vibrated finger than in the non-vibrated finger. In both fingers, there was a progressive decrease in FBF after the end of exposure to vibration with frequencies of 31.5-250 Hz. The higher the frequency of vibration, the stronger the decrease in FBF in both fingers during recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Acute exposures to vibration with equal frequency weighted magnitude reduce the FBF in both vibrated and non-vibrated fingers for frequencies between 31.5 and 250 Hz. The extent of digital vasoconstriction after exposure to vibration increases with increasing frequency. The frequency weighting given in current standards tends to overestimate the vasoconstriction associated with acute exposures to vibration frequencies around 16 Hz.

Thermal thresholds, vibrotactile thresholds and finger systolic blood pressures in dockyard workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify neurological dysfunction in workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration using alternative neurological tests. To relate the neurological findings to the results of vascular tests and the symptoms reported by subjects with vibration-induced white finger. METHODS: Thermal thresholds (for perception of heat and cold), vibrotactile thresholds (for perception of vibration at 31.5 and 125 Hz) and finger systolic blood pressures were measured in 107 dockyard workers, including 31 controls and 76 workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration (50 reporting finger blanching consistent with vibration-induced white finger). A history of vibration exposure and symptoms associated with hand-transmitted vibration were obtained for each subject. RESULTS: Increased duration of exposure to vibration resulted in a deterioration of both thermal thresholds and vibrotactile thresholds. Finger systolic blood pressures were lower in subjects reporting finger blanching and were related to the extent of blanching on the measured finger. Reported sensations of tingling were not correlated with any of the threshold measures; thermal thresholds and vibrotactile thresholds showed evidence of deterioration with reports of increasing numbness. Both numbness and tingling were correlated with reports of finger blanching. Finger systolic blood pressures were not correlated with either thermal or vibrotactile thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular and neurological signs produced by hand-transmitted vibration can occur independently, but the principal vascular symptom (i.e. attacks of blanching) and some commonly reported neurological symptoms (i.e. sensations of numbness and tingling) may be related.

Magnitude of acute exposures to vibration and finger circulation.

OBJECTIVES: Changes in finger circulation were studied during and after acute exposure to increasing magnitudes of hand-transmitted vibration. METHODS: Finger skin temperature (FST) and finger blood flow (FBF) were measured in the middle fingers of both hands of 10 healthy men. The right hand was exposed for 15 minutes to 125-Hz vibration with acceleration magnitudes of either 5.5, 22, 44, or 62 m/s2 root-mean-square. The measures of finger circulation were taken before the vibration, at fixed intervals during exposure, and during a 45-minute recovery period. RESULTS: The FST did not change during vibration exposure, whereas vibration of any magnitude provoked significant reductions in the FBF of the vibrated finger when compared with the preexposure FBF and the contralateral (nonvibrated finger) FBF. Vasoconstrictor aftereffects (i.e., during recovery) were observed in both fingers after the end of exposure to vibration magnitudes greater than 22 m/s2 root-mean-square. The higher the vibration magnitude, the stronger the reduction of FBF in either finger during both vibration exposure and the recovery period. This effect was stronger in the vibrated finger than in the nonvibrated finger during both periods. CONCLUSIONS: Acute exposure to 125-Hz vibration can reduce FBF in both the vibrated and the nonvibrated finger, and the degree of digital vasoconstriction is related to the magnitude of the vibration. The pattern of the hemodynamic changes during and after vibration exposure suggests that complex vasomotor mechanisms are involved in the response of digital vessels to acute vibration.

Duration of acute exposures to vibration and finger circulation.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated changes in finger circulation after different durations of exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. METHODS: Finger skin temperature (FST), finger blood flow (FBF), and finger systolic blood pressure (FSBP) were measured in the middle fingers of both hands of 10 healthy men. Finger vascular resistance was also estimated. The right hand was exposed for 7.5, 15, and 30 minutes (static load 10 N) to 125-Hz vibration (root-mean-square acceleration 87 m/s2). Static load only was used as a control. Finger circulation was measured before the vibration and static load exposure and at fixed intervals during exposure and a 45-minute recovery period. RESULTS: No significant changes were found with the static load. The FST and FSBP did not change significantly during vibration exposure, whereas vibration produced significant reductions in FBF and increases in vascular resistance at each duration when compared with preexposure and contralateral (non-vibrated) finger values. Temporary vasodilation occurred in the vibrated finger immediately after each vibration exposure. Recovery was complete for FBF and vascular resistance after the 7.5-minute vibration, whereas a progressive FBF reduction occurred in both the vibrated and the nonvibrated fingers after 15- and 30-minute exposure. The longer the duration of vibration exposure, the stronger the vasoconstriction in the vibrated finger during recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoregulatory mechanisms mediated by both intrinsic (local) and extrinsic (neural or endocrine) control systems seem to be related to digital circulatory changes during 125-Hz vibration. It is concluded that, not only the frequency and magnitude of vibration, but also its duration contributes to the reaction of the digital vessels to acute vibration.

Finger systolic blood pressures: effects of cold provocation on the reference finger.

Finger systolic blood pressure measured after cold provocation and ischemia of a digit is used to assist in the diagnosis of vibration-induced white finger, VWF. A reduction in finger systolic blood pressure after cooling is assumed to indicate vascular dysfunction. The percentage pressure change observed in the tested finger is often corrected for whole body effects (systemic systolic pressure changes) according to the pressure change measured in a reference finger. The commonly used method of correction is based on assumptions as to the causes of any changes occurring in the reference finger. It is assumed that the reference finger is not differentially susceptible to the cold provocation of the test finger, arising from either close proximity to the cold provocation or from a vascular disorder in the reference finger. An experiment has been undertaken to investigate the repeatability, over three days, of measurements of the arm systolic pressures of both arms and the finger systolic pressures in air of four fingers of both hands. The systolic pressures of both arms and of four fingers of one hand were also measured whilst the fifth finger of the same hand was subjected to cold provocation at 10 degrees C. Twelve healthy male subjects were rested in a supine position for 15 minutes in a room at 21-24 degrees C before measurements were taken. Finger systolic blood pressures were recorded using strain gauge plethysmography. The results show that the systolic blood pressure measurements were generally repeatable, but differed with measurement location. Cold provocation of the test finger had little consistent effect on the systolic pressures measured at other locations. The results are interpreted with regard to the correction of finger systolic pressure using a reference measurement.