ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As single-head data acquisition for thallium-201 myocardial SPECT is a frequently used method mainly in the outpatient medical care as well as in smaller hospitals, comparison to dual-head data collection is a still discussed issue mainly with regard to quality control and -assurance. METHODS: A total of 1334 patients undergoing thallium-201 myocardial SPECT for diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and/or viability have been retrospectively analyzed. In 554 patients, a single-head gamma camera (360 degrees rotation) has been applied, whereas a dual-head gamma camera (180 degrees rotation) has been used in 780 patients. Four hundred twenty-six patients received both myocardial SPECT as well as coronary angiography. The diagnostic value of both applied acquisition techniques has been analyzed. RESULTS: Regarding myocardial viability, positive predictive value for the diagnosis of myocardial scar tissue was significantly higher for dual-head- as compared to single-head acquisition. Among the 426 patients undergoing diagnosis of myocardial ischemia, significant differences have only been found with regard to specificity being higher in the single-head acquisition. Diagnosis of myocardial ischemia related to a distinct myocardial perfusion region showed a significantly higher sensitivity of dual-head acquisition for the left anterior descending perfusion area, whereas specificity was significantly higher for single-head acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a beneficial effect of dual-head data collection with regard to sensitivity of the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia. In contrast, single-head data acquisition was superior with regard to specificity. However, it is justified to preferably apply dual-head data collection in clinical routine due to the shorter acquisition time leading to an evident time benefit of this acquisition technique.
