Paediatric bladder dysfunction: A single centre experience of public hospital wait times.

AIM: Paediatric bladder dysfunction, including daytime urinary incontinence and enuresis, is a common and distressing condition. Unfortunately, children with these symptoms are often on waitlists for several months. This treatment delay may significantly impact upon the child and family unit. This study aimed to quantify waiting times for children who had attended hospital outpatient clinics for symptoms of wetting. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken for patients who had been referred to The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne outpatient clinics for symptoms of wetting (with/without bowel symptoms). Data regarding the referral and triage pathway, up to the time of the first clinic appointment, were collected. These data were compared to a previous audit conducted in the same setting. RESULTS: A total of 101 clinic attendances were included in this study. The overall waiting time, from receipt of referral to the patient's first clinic attendance, was a median of 181 days (n = 94 valid responses; range 7-695). Wait times for patients with isolated symptoms of wetting were similar to patients with mixed bowel and bladder dysfunction (187 and 171.5 days, respectively). Most patients were triaged to the continence clinic (n = 68), whilst smaller proportions of patients were seen in the encopresis (n = 14), urology (n = 13), general medicine (n = 2), gastroenterology (n = 1) and nurse-led enuresis clinic (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The waiting times for patients with wetting generally exceeded 5 months. Alternative pathways for triage need to be explored to manage demand and improve wait times.

Virtual Reality for Pediatric Needle Procedural Pain: Two Randomized Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a virtual reality distraction for needle pain in 2 common hospital settings: the emergency department (ED) and outpatient pathology (ie, outpatient laboratory). The control was standard of care (SOC) practice. STUDY DESIGN: In 2 clinical trials, we randomized children aged 4-11 years undergoing venous needle procedures to virtual reality or SOC at 2 tertiary Australian hospitals. In the first study, we enrolled children in the ED requiring intravenous cannulation or venipuncture. In the second, we enrolled children in outpatient pathology requiring venipuncture. In the ED, 64 children were assigned to virtual reality and 59 to SOC. In pathology, 63 children were assigned to virtual reality and 68 to SOC; 2 children withdrew assent in the SOC arm, leaving 66. The primary endpoint was change from baseline pain between virtual reality and SOC on child-rated Faces Pain Scale-Revised. RESULTS: In the ED, there was no change in pain from baseline with SOC, whereas virtual reality produced a significant reduction in pain (between-group difference, -1.78; 95% CI, -3.24 to -0.317; P = .018). In pathology, both groups experienced an increase in pain from baseline, but this was significantly less in the virtual reality group (between-group difference, -1.39; 95% CI, -2.68 to -0.11; P = .034). Across both studies, 10 participants experienced minor adverse events, equally distributed between virtual reality/SOC; none required pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In children aged 4-11 years of age undergoing intravenous cannulation or venipuncture, virtual reality was efficacious in decreasing pain and was safe. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12617000285358p.