Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia associated with gemcitabine chemotherapy: experience at an Australian center and recommendations for targeted prophylaxis.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is seen increasingly in non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected immunocompromised populations, but few cases have previously been reported in association with gemcitabine therapy. We identified all patients administered gemcitabine between March 2009 and December 2012 at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre. Cases of PJP were identified using accepted definitions. Overall, 288 gemcitabine-treated patients were identified. Nine cases of PJP were detected, corresponding to an overall rate of 3.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-5.7%). PJP was diagnosed during gemcitabine therapy in seven patients, a median of 67 (range 31-109) days from commencement. Among patients with lymphoma, 4/22 developed PJP, corresponding to a rate of 18.2% (95% CI 6.1-38.2%). Fewer infections were associated with breast, lung and gastrointestinal malignancies (1/24 [4.2%], 3/118 [2.5%] and 1/61 [1.6%], respectively). A risk-based tool incorporating concomitant steroid therapy can be applied to target high-risk populations who would benefit from PJP prophylaxis during gemcitabine therapy.

Molecular diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii in patients with malignancy: clinical significance of quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is increasingly seen in association with the use of new and potent immunosuppressive therapies in populations not infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Today, molecular methods are widely used to improve diagnostic yield; however, the relationship between clinical findings and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results is undefined. Our objective was to describe characteristics of PJP in patients with malignancies and determine if qPCR results were correlated with clinical findings. From 2007 to 2012, all patients at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre with positive Pneumocystis PCR were identified from a microbiology database. Clinical, radiological, and microbiological records were reviewed. PJP was defined as the presence of positive PCR for Pneumocystis on a respiratory specimen, radiological abnormalities consistent with a pneumonic process, and receipt of targeted PJP treatment. qPCR was performed on all diagnostic specimens, and values were reported according to clinical findings. Forty-five patients fulfilled inclusion criteria: 44.4% had underlying solid organ tumors and 55.6% had hematological malignancies. Nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and lymphoma were the most frequent predispositions. Shortness of breath, cough, and fever were reported in 64.4%, 48.9%, and 42.2% of the patients, respectively. Admission to the intensive care unit and mortality rates were lower than in previous reports. Overall, a relationship between other clinical features and qPCR results was not identified. In the era of routine molecular diagnostics, patients with malignancy and PJP have improved outcomes. However, there was no demonstrable relationship between qPCR results and clinical features or PCR data and outcomes.

A survey of reimbursement practices of private health insurance companies for pharmaceuticals not covered under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 2008.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the current practices and policy of Australian private health insurance (PHI) companies with respect to cover for pharmaceuticals not subsidised under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A 2008 review of web-published policy statements for top-level hospital and comprehensive general treatment insurance, and survey of reimbursement practices by way of questionnaire, of 31 Australian-registered, open-membership PHI companies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES(S): Description of the level of pharmaceutical cover and important considerations identified by PHI companies for funding non-PBS pharmaceuticals through benefit entitlements or ex-gratia payments. RESULTS: Nine of thirty-one PHI companies (29%) provided responses accounting for ~60% market share of PHI. The majority of smaller PHI firms either declined participation or did not respond. The maximum limits offered for non-PBS pharmaceuticals, under comprehensive general treatment insurance, varied significantly and typically did not adequately cover high-cost pharmaceuticals. Some companies occasionally offered ex-gratia payments (or discretionary payments in excess of the policyholder's entitlement benefits) for high cost-pharmaceuticals. Factors considered important in their decision to approve or reject ex-gratia requests were provided. All results were de-identified. CONCLUSIONS: There is little consistency across PHI companies in the manner in which they handle requests for high-cost pharmaceuticals in excess of the defined benefit limits. Such information and processes are not transparent to consumers.