Curing pancreatic cancer.

The distinct biology of pancreatic cancer with aggressive and early invasive tumor cells, a tumor promoting microenvironment, late diagnosis, and high therapy resistance poses major challenges on clinicians, researchers, and patients. In current clinical practice, a curative approach for pancreatic cancer can only be offered to a minority of patients and even for those patients, the long-term outcome is grim. This bitter combination will eventually let pancreatic cancer rise to the second leading cause of cancer-related mortalities. With surgery being the only curative option, complete tumor resection still remains the center of pancreatic cancer treatment. In recent years, new developments in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment have emerged. Together with improved perioperative care including complication management, an increasing number of patients have become eligible for tumor resection. Basic research aims to further increase these numbers by new methods of early detection, better tumor modelling and personalized treatment options. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on clinical and biologic features, surgical and non-surgical treatment options, and the improved collaboration of clinicians and basic researchers in pancreatic cancer that will hopefully result in more successful ways of curing pancreatic cancer.

Increase of survival benefit in advanced resectable colon cancer by extent of adjuvant treatment: results of a randomized trial comparing modulation of 5-FU + levamisole with folinic acid or with interferon-alpha.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant therapy in curatively resected lymph node-positive colon cancer was established using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and levamisole (LEV) for 12 months. 5-FU cytotoxicity can be modulated by folinic acid (FA) or interferon-alpha (INF-alpha). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of modulating 5-FU+ LEV by either FA or IFN-alpha in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk colon cancer. METHODS: Patients with curatively resected colon cancer (stages UICC IIb and III) were stratified according to T, N, and participating center and randomized to receive a 12-month treatment using 5-FU + LEV alone or in combination with FA or IFN-alpha. RESULTS: A total of 855 of 904 entered patients (94.6%) were eligible. The median follow-up of all eligible patients was 4.6 years. Addition of FA to 5-FU + LEV improved recurrence-free and overall survival in comparison with 5-FU + LEV alone (P = 0.007 and P = 0.004, respectively, 1-sided). The 5-year overall survival rates were 60.5% (95% confidence interval, 54.3-66.7) and 72.0% (95% confidence interval, 66.5-77.5) for 5-FU + LEV and 5-FU + LEV + FA, respectively. Addition of INF-alpha showed a tendency to improve recurrence-free survival, however, without altering overall survival. Toxicities (WHO III + IV) were generally tolerable except one toxic death in the control arm and were observed in 9.9% of the patients receiving 5-FU + LEV alone and in 13.3% and in 30.7% of patients receiving additional FA and IFN-alpha, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of IFN-alpha was associated with increased toxicity without markedly influencing the outcome and should therefore not be recommended for adjuvant treatment. Addition of FA increased the 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rate by 9.3 and 11.5 percentage points, respectively. 5-FU + LEV + FA for 12 months may be an effective adjuvant treatment option for locally advanced high-risk colon cancer.

Treatment of pancreatic cancer: challenge of the facts.

Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is associated with the worst survival of any form of gastrointestinal malignancy. In spite of the progress in surgical treatment, resulting in increasing resection rates and a decrease in treatment-related morbidity and mortality, the true figures of cure are even today below 3%. The dissemination of pancreatic cancer behind the local tissue compartments restricts the short-term (< 3 years) and long-term outcome for patients who have undergone resection. By histological evaluation, less than 15% of the patients undergoing R(0) resection have a pN(0) status, more than 60% suffer from lymph angiosis carcinomatosa, and more than 50% suffer extrapancreatic nerve plexus infiltration. Hematoxylin and eosin-negative lymph nodes were found to be cancer positive when reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCR) or immunostaining was applied to the HE-negative lymph nodes. Cancer of the uncinate process has a very poor prognosis because there are no early symptoms; vessel wall involvement occurs early and frequently; a high association of liver metastasis exists as well. Surgery offers a low success rate, but it provides the only chance of cure. Ductal pancreatic cancer is diagnosed in more than 95% of the cases in an advanced stage; potentially curative resection can be performed only in about 10%-15% of these patients. Major contributions of surgery to improved treatment results are the reduction of surgical morbidity--e.g., early postoperative local and systemic complications--and a decrease of hospital mortality below 3%-5%. In most recently published prospective trials, R(0) resection has been reported to result in an increase in short-term survival beyond that recorded for patients with residual tumor. However, R(0) resection fails to improve long-term survival. In many published R(0) series, standard tissue resection of pancreatic head cancer with the Kausch-Whipple procedure failed to include remote cancer cell-positive tissues in the operative specimen; e.g., N(2)-lymph nodes, nerve plexus, and perivascular extrapancreatic and retropancreatic tissues were not excised. Cancer recurrence after so-called R(0) resection with curative intent is frequently the consequence of cancer left behind. Thus, long-term survival (> 5 years) is observed in a very small group of patients, contradicting the published 5-year actuarial survival rates of 20%-45% for resected patients. The assessment of clinical benefit from surgical or medical cancer treatment should therefore be based on several end points, not only on actuarial survival. Publication of actuarial survival figures must include the number of observed (actual) survivals, the definition of the subset of patients followed after resection, and the total number of patients in the study group; anything less is misleading. In reporting pancreatic cancer treatment trial results after oncological resections, more convincing primary end points to evaluate treatment efficacy are median survival (in months), actual survival at 1-5 years, and progression-free survival (in months). In series with multimodality treatment, clinical benefit response as well as quality of life measurements using the EORTC Quality of Life index C30 (QLQ-C30) are of importance in evaluating survival data. Adjuvant treatment improves survival after oncological resection; however, the short-term and long-term benefit after adjuvant chemotherapy in R(0) as well as in R(1)-(2) resected patients has not yet been underscored by data from controlled clinical trials. The survival benefit (median survival time) of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy has been demonstrated to be 6-10 months. Therefore, after oncological resection of pancreatic cancer each patient should be offered adjuvant treatment. A neoadjuvant treatment protocol for pancreatic cancer, however, has not been established.

Surgery of colorectal cancer: surgical morbidity and five- and ten-year results in 2400 patients--monoinstitutional experience.

The objective of this study was to determine surgical morbidity and long-term outcome of colorectal cancer surgery for quality control reasons and as the basis for new treatment modalities. Surgically treated colorectal cancer patients (mean age 65 years) were followed prospectively in a university center (110 months mean follow-up, 1978-1999). Overall survival (OAS), radicality, extent of resection, recurrence, and morbidity were analyzed (log-rank test of survival, multivariate analysis). Altogether, 2452 colorectal cancers localized in the colon (CC, 44.6%), rectum (RC, 44.8%) or multicentric (CRC, 10.6%) were of UICC stages I (19%), II (30%), III (21%), IV (20%), or undetermined (10%). Radicality and stage but not tumor localization influenced the OAS (p <0.0001). The 5-year/10-year OASs were 50%/42% (all), 78%/66% (R0), 46%/36% (R1), 4%/0% (R2), 0% (unresected) and 86%/79% (I), 70%/58% (II), 42%/33% (III), 3%/0% (IV) or 21%/12% (undetermined), respectively (p <0.0001). Multivisceral resections (17%) resulted in morbidity and survival rates equal to those for standard resection. The overall tumor recurrence rate was 27%, mainly with both local and distant relapse (15%). Surgery-related complications occurred in 18% (all), 14% (CC), 21% (RC), or 20% (CRC). The perineal infection rate (RC) was 4%, overall anastomotic leakage 1%, and mortality rate 0.8%. A prospective, uniform follow-up used over two decades warrants quality control in colorectal cancer surgery, which was curative for half of the patients. The morbidity and mortality were low and were not increased by multivisceral resections.