Offline and online parental mentalizing in mothers with symptoms of postpartum depression: Examining the association between self-reported parental reflective functioning and interactional mind-mindedness.

Mentalizing is, to a certain extent, considered context specific. However, research on the association between parents' abilities to reflect upon their infant's mental states outside social interaction (offline) versus during ongoing parent-infant interaction (online) is currently limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported offline and online mentalizing in a sample of primarily ethnically Danish mothers (N = 142), with symptoms of postpartum depression, and their 1-11-month-old infants. Offline mentalizing was assessed with the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire-Infant Version (PRFQ-I) and online mentalizing was assessed with interactional mind-mindedness. Ordinal logistic regressions showed that a higher score on the PRFQ-I prementalizing subscale was negatively related to number of overall mind-related comments and appropriate mind-related comments produced by mothers during interaction with their infant. Our results indicate partial overlaps between self-reported parental reflective functioning and mind-mindedness, that is, that particularly offline maladaptive mentalizing is associated with lower levels of mentalizing during interaction in mothers with symptoms of depression. Post-hoc examination of the interaction effect of postpartum depression showed that this association was only evident in mothers with medium to high levels of depression. Findings and implications are discussed.

Se considera, hasta cierto punto, que la mentalización se corresponde con un contexto específico. Sin embargo, la investigación acerca de la asociación entre las habilidades de los padres de reflexionar sobre los estados mentales de sus infantes fuera de la interacción social (no conectada a la internet / fuera de línea) versus la continua interacción progenitor­infante (en línea) es actualmente limitada. Este estudio investigó la asociación entre la auto­reportada mentalización tanto fuera de línea como en línea en un grupo muestra primariamente de madres étnicamente danesas (N = 142), con síntomas de depresión posterior al parto, y sus infantes de 1 a 11 meses de edad. La mentalización fuera de línea se evaluó por medio del Cuestionario del Funcionamiento con Reflexión del Progenitor ­ Versión del Infante (PRFQ­I) y la mentalización en línea se evaluó con el sistema de codificación de Conciencia Mental. La regresión logística ordinal mostró que un puntaje más alto en la sub­escala de pre­mentalización del PRFQ­I se asoció negativamente con el número en general de comentarios relacionados con la mente y de apropiados comentarios relacionados con la mente producidos por las madres durante la interacción con sus infantes. Nuestros resultados indican que hay superposiciones coincidentes parciales entre el funcionamiento con reflexión auto­reportado por el progenitor y la conciencia mental, v.g. que particularmente la mentalización fuera de línea inadaptada se asocia con una conciencia mental en línea menos óptima en madres con síntomas de depresión. Las posteriores examinaciones que el efecto de la interacción de la Escala de Depresión Postnatal de Edimburgo (EPDS) tiene sobre la asociación mostraron que esta característica sólo fue evidente en madres con niveles medianos a altos de depresión. Se discuten los resultados y las implicaciones.

La mentalisation est, dans une certaine mesure, considérée comme étant spécifique au contexte. Cependant les recherches sur le lien entre les capacités des parents à réfléchir sur les états mentaux de leur bébé en dehors de l'interaction sociale (hors connexion) par rapport à l'interaction continue parent­bébé (en ligne) sont en ce moment limitées. Cette étude s'est penchée sur le lien entre la mentalisation auto­déclarée hors connexion et en ligne chez un échantillon de mères en grande partie danoises (N = 142), avec des symptômes de dépression postpartum et leurs bébés âgés de 1 à 11 mois. La mentalisation hors connexion a été évaluée au moyen du Questionnaire de la Fonction Réflexive Parentale ­ Version Nourrisson (en anglais PRFQ­I) et la mentalisation en ligne a été évaluée au moyen du système de codage esprit­sensibilité. Des régressions logistiques ordinales ont montré qu'un score plus élevé à la sous­échelle PRFQ­I était lié de manière négative au nombre de commentaires généraux liés à l'esprit et à des commentaires liés à l'esprit appropriés produits par les mères durant l'interaction avec leur bébé. Nos résultats indiquent des chevauchement spartiels entre la fonction réflexive parentale auto­rapportée et la sensibilité, c'est­à­dire que la mentalisation inadaptée en particulier hors­connexion est liée à une sensibilité moins qu'optimale chez les mères avec des symptômes de dépression. L'examen a posteriori des effets de l'interaction de l'EPDS sur ce lien a montré que cela n'était que vrai chez les mères avec des niveaux de dépression de moyens à élevés. Les résultats et implications sont discutés.

Use of the least intrusive coercion at Danish psychiatric wards: A register-based cohort study of 131,632 first and subsequent coercive episodes within 35,812 admissions.

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric legislation in Denmark implies a principle of using the least intrusive types of coercion first. The intrusiveness is not universally agreed upon. We examined the order in which coercive measures during admission were used, implying that the first used should be less intrusive than the following types. METHODS: For coercive episodes reported to the national administrative register for the period 2011-16, the order of 12 legal coercive interventions during each admission was examined. Comparing with mechanical restraint, the odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (95%CI) of being first or subsequent used types were estimated using conditioned (96,611 episodes) and unconditioned (131,632 episodes) logistic regression models, stratified on sex. RESULTS: Totally 17,796 patients aged 18+ were subjected to at least one coercive episode. The median time between admission and the first episode was 4 days in men and 6 for women. For females, involuntary detention, forced feeding, coercive treatment of somatic disorder, locking of doors and close observations in females were used before mechanical restraint, and forced follow-up, involuntary electro convulsive therapy (ECT), forced treatment, use of gloves and straps, physical restraint and forced intramuscular medication was used later. In men, only involuntary detention was used before mechanical restraint, while involuntary ECT, close observations, administration of drugs, use of gloves and straps, physical restraint and forced intramuscular medication was used after mechanical restraint. CONCLUSION: The order of used coercive measures is not consistent with the international ranking of the least intrusive types, especially in men and in younger adults.

Why Do Women with Eating Disorders Decline Treatment? A Qualitative Study of Barriers to Specialized Eating Disorder Treatment.

Despite the fact that eating disorders (EDs) are conditions that are potentially life-threatening, many people decline treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate why women decline specialized ED treatment, including their viewpoints on treatment services. Eighteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with women who had declined inpatient or outpatient specialized ED treatment. A thematic analysis revealed five main themes: (1) Disagreement on treatment needs, (2) rigid standard procedures, (3) failure to listen, (4) deprivation of identity, and (5) mistrust and fear. The women had declined ED treatment because they believed that treatment was only focused on nutritional rehabilitation and that it failed to address their self-identified needs. From their perspectives treatment was characterized by rigid standard procedures that could not be adapted to their individual situations and preferences. They felt that the therapists failed to listen to them, and they felt deprived of identity and reduced to an ED instead of a real person. This investigation is one of the first of its kind to provide clues as to how treatment could be moderated to better meet the needs of women who decline specialized ED treatment.

Representativeness of personality and involvement preferences in a web-based survey on healthcare decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Obtaining a sample that is representative of the group of interest is of utmost importance in questionnaire studies. In a survey using a state authorized web-portal for citizen communication with authorities, we wanted to investigate the view of adult men on patient involvement in health care decision-making regarding Prostate-Specific Antigen test for prostatic cancer. In this paper, we report on sample characteristics and representativeness of our sample in terms of personality and baseline involvement preferences. METHODS: We compared personality profiles (BFI-10) and baseline healthcare decision-making preferences (CPS) in our sample (n = 6756) to internationally available datasets. Pooled data from a) US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand (n = 1512), b) Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Belgium (n = 1136), and c) Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark (n = 1313) were used for BFI-10 comparisons. Regarding CPS, we compared our sample with three previous datasets relating to decision-making in cancer (n = 425, 387, and 199). RESULTS: Although statistically significant differences particularly appeared in large dataset comparisons, sample BFI-10 and CPS profiles mostly were within the range of those previously reported. Similarity was greatest in BFI-10 comparisons with group a) where no statistically significant difference could be established in factors 'agreeableness' and 'neuroticism' (p = .095 and .578, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite some variation, our sample displays personality and baseline preference profiles that are generally similar to those described in previous international studies. For example, this was the case with the BFI-10 'agreeableness' measure (incl. trust and fault-finding items), an important factor in healthcare decision-making.