Delivery of low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis using a novel, needle-less injection device (J-Tip).

Given daily, low molecular weight (LMW) heparins are established for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We describe delivery by a novel, needle-less device that is virtually painless in action. Its use could provide benefits for patients in terms of comfort both psychologically and physically, and for healthcare workers in terms of safety from needle-stick injury. Patients undergoing elective surgery received LMW heparin delivered subcutaneously by either a standard needle and syringe or by the needle-less injection device, J-Tip. Pain was scored at the time of injection and plasma anti-factor Xa levels compared between the two methods of drug delivery 4 h later: 29 patients received LMW heparin delivered by the J-Tip and 31 patients by standard needle and syringe. The J-Tip was significantly more comfortable for the patient as the method of drug delivery (P < 0.001). When delivered by the J-Tip, LMW heparin was equally as efficacious, as plasma anti-factor Xa levels were similar for both methods of delivery (P < 0.42). In summary, delivery of LMW heparin by the J-Tip device was both comfortable and effective. These findings, taken in conjunction with its ease of use and complete freedom from risk of needle-stick injury might encourage further examination and use of this type of product.

Integrated care pathways for vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVES: a trial of the use of integrated care pathways (ICPs) for elective vascular surgical procedures. DESIGN: a 12-month prospective study, following a multi-disciplinary group construction of current "best practice" ICPs, with changes in practice only occurring following careful audit of results. MATERIALS: patients admitted to a single vascular unit for "open" repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy or femoropopliteal bypass grafting. METHODS: patients followed ICPs on a daily basis with signatures required to confirm that action had been taken and careful recording of variances from the ICPs. Audit of variance data allowed changes in the ICPs and, hence, provision of the best possible nursing and clinical practice. RESULTS: ICPs were well received by patients and staff. They improved communication, promoted an appreciation of each health group's role in patient care, increased nursing autonomy, reduced calls to junior medical staff, improved patient education and confidence and caused a marked reduction in hospital "length of stay". CONCLUSIONS: ICPs have clear benefits. This study realises that benefits might be maximal for high throughput, high-cost procedures. Successful use of ICPs depends upon "clinical champions" and effective project management. Sufficient resource and training are essential.

Vascular surgical society of great britain and ireland: integrated care pathways for vascular surgery

BACKGROUND: Integrated care pathways (ICPs) represent a multidisciplinary approach to clinical patient care. METHODS: A 1-year prospective trial of the use of ICPs for elective vascular surgical procedures was undertaken. A multidisciplinary group constructed ICPs for patients admitted for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy or femoropopliteal bypass grafting. Patient management followed ICPs on a daily basis with signatures required to confirm that each action had been taken. Variances from the ICPs were carefully recorded. Audit of variance data allowed subsequent revision of the ICPs and hence provision of the best possible nursing and clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 33 patients were entered into the study; 16 had a femoropopliteal bypass graft, eight carotid endarterectomy and nine open repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. ICPs were well received by patients and staff. They improved communication, promoted an appreciation of each health group's role in patient care, increased nursing autonomy, reduced calls to junior medical staff, improved patient education and confidence, and caused a marked reduction in length of hospital stay. Overall, patients were discharged 13 per cent earlier after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, 22 per cent earlier after carotid endarterectomy and 38 per cent earlier after femoropopliteal bypass grafting. CONCLUSION: ICPs have clear benefits. They improve overall clinical efficiency and enhance clinical governance. Successful use of ICPs depends upon 'clinical champions' and effective project management. Sufficient resources and training are essential.