Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Anim Sci ; 93(8): 3941-9, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26440174

ABSTRACT

Seven ruminally cannulated crossbred steers (BW = 720 ± 62 kg) were used in a randomized crossover design (4 periods, each 18 d) to evaluate in vivo rumen characteristics and apparent digestibility of steers consuming low-quality prairie hay and 1 of 4 isonitrogenous protein supplements. Treatments included 1) 40% CP (DM basis) cottonseed meal and wheat middlings-based supplement (Control), 2) a cottonseed meal and wheat middlings-based supplement with slow-release urea and a fibrolytic feed enzyme (Optimase; Alltech, Inc., Nicholasville, KY) designed to replace 30% of plant-based CP provided in the Control (OPT), 3) the Control plus 0.40 mg∙kg BW∙d monensin (Rumensin 90; Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN; MON), and 4) the OPT plus 0.40 mg∙kg BW∙d monensin (COMBO). Steers were allowed ad libitum access to prairie hay (5.0% CP and 76% NDF) and were provided each respective supplement at 0800 h daily at a rate of 1.0 g/kg of BW. Steers were adapted to diets for 10 d before sample collection. Beginning on d 11, DMI was measured and samples were collected to determine apparent digestibility. On d 15 of the 18-d period, rumen fluid was collected 10 times over a 24-h period. Forage DMI was greater ( ≤ 0.02) for steers consuming the OPT compared with steers consuming the MON or COMBO, although forage DMI was not different ( = 0.10) among steers consuming the Control compared with steers consuming the OPT, MON, or COMBO. Steers fed the MON and COMBO had lower ( ≤ 0.05) passage rate compared with steers fed the Control and the OPT. The MON-fed steers had lower ( = 0.01) ruminal pH and increased ( = 0.03) propionate as a percentage of total VFA production. A time × treatment ( = 0.01) interaction was observed for ruminal NH-N due to a rapid (0 to 1 h after feeding) increase followed by a quick (1 to 4 h after feeding) decline in NH-N by steers consuming the OPT and COMBO that was not observed for steers consuming all other treatments. Apparent digestibility of DM ( = 0.01) and NDF ( = 0.03) were improved for steers fed the COMBO supplement compared with steers consuming all other experimental supplements. This work suggests that the OPT may be an effective replacement for a portion of supplemental degradable intake protein in low-quality forage. Further research is necessary to determine if the combination of monensin and the Optimase consistently improves low-quality forage utilization.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Cattle/physiology , Digestion/physiology , Enzymes/pharmacology , Monensin/pharmacology , Rumen/physiology , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Cross-Over Studies , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements , Male , Poaceae , Proton Ionophores/pharmacology , Rumen/drug effects
2.
J Anim Sci ; 93(6): 3076-83, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115293

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were designed to investigate the effects of feeding monensin and/or slow release urea with a fibrolytic feed enzyme (Optimase; Alltech, Inc., Nicholasville, KY) on performance, milk production, calf growth performance, and blood metabolites in beef cows. Spring-calving cows and heifers were used in a completely randomized design in Exp. 1 (N = 84; 534 ± 68 kg initial BW) and Exp. 2 (N = 107; 508 ± 72 kg initial BW). Exp. 1 supplements were formulated to meet cow protein requirements and fed daily and included 1) cottonseed meal with no monensin (control); or 2) monensin added to control to supply 200 mg per head per d (MON). In Exp. 2, experimental supplements included 1) cottonseed meal/wheat middlings (CS) fed at a rate to provide adequate DIP and CP according to , 2) the CS plus soybean hulls and 61 g per cow per d Optimase (OPT), 3) the CS plus monensin to supply 200 mg per cow per d (MON2), and 4) OPT plus MON2 (Combo). Cows were fed in last trimester through early lactation in Exp. 1 and during 2nd trimester in Exp. 2. Data were analyzed using the Mixed procedure in SAS with animal as the experimental unit. In Exp. 1, treatment did not affect cow BW or BCS change (P > 0.19). Calf birth BW was not affected by dam treatment (P = 0.24); however, calves from dams consuming MON weighed more (P < 0.04) at d 45 and at trial end. Calves also had greater (P = 0.04) ADG from birth to trial end. Milk production did not significantly differ among treatments (P > 0.41). In Exp. 2, mean cow BW and BCS were similar (P > 0.35) among treatments on d 90. However, from d 0 to 54, cows assigned to the OPT supplement gained less BCS (P = 0.02) compared with cows assigned to the CS supplement. Cumulative BCS gain was greater (P < 0.01) for CS-fed cows than for cows fed the OPT and MON2 supplements, although it was not significantly different for cows fed the Combo supplement. These studies indicate that the influence of monensin on cow BW and BCS change is inconsistent. The potential for monensin supplementation to positively impact calf performance during early lactation seems to be clearer. Replacing a portion of oilseed N in the supplement with Optimase may marginally reduce cow performance. Further research is needed to determine both the effects of monensin and the implications of combining monensin with Optimase on forage intake and cow performance at various stages of production.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Enzymes/pharmacology , Lactation/drug effects , Monensin/pharmacology , Pregnancy, Animal/drug effects , Urea/pharmacology , Animal Feed , Animals , Animals, Newborn/growth & development , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Urea Nitrogen , Body Weight/drug effects , Body Weight/physiology , Dietary Supplements , Edible Grain , Enzymes/administration & dosage , Female , Lactation/physiology , Milk/metabolism , Monensin/administration & dosage , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Animal/physiology , Urea/administration & dosage
3.
J Anim Sci ; 88(11): 3666-82, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20656980

ABSTRACT

A total of 1,112 pigs (initial BW of 49.8 kg) were used in a 78-d study to evaluate the effects of 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20% dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS) and sex on carcass fat quality of finishing pigs. All diets contained 6% choice white grease and were fed in 4 finishing phases (50 to 59, 59 to 82, 82 to 105, and 105 to 123 kg, respectively). The experiment was conducted in a commercial research finishing barn in southwestern Minnesota. There were 9 replicates of each dietary treatment, with 25 to 28 pigs per pen, and barrows and gilts were distributed equally in each pen. On d 57, the 3 heaviest barrows from each pen were visually selected, removed, and marketed, and a total of 6 pigs per treatment were selected randomly for fatty acid analysis. On d 78, the remaining pigs from each pen were individually tattooed and shipped to a pork processing plant. Jowl fat, backfat, and belly fat samples were collected from 1 barrow and 1 gilt chosen randomly from each pen and analyzed for fatty acid composition. Iodine value (IV) was calculated for diets and fat samples. Fat quality data were analyzed as a split plot with DDGS treatment as the whole plot and sex as the subplot. Concentrations of C18:2n-6, PUFA, and IV increased (linear, P = 0.02) with increasing DDGS in backfat, jowl fat, and belly fat in pigs marketed on d 57 and 78. In contrast, C18:1 cis-9 and MUFA concentrations decreased linearly (P = 0.05) in all 3 fat depots with increasing DDGS. For every 10% DDGS included in the diet, IV of backfat, jowl fat, and belly fat increased by 2.3, 1.6, and 2.2 g/100 g, respectively. In pigs slaughtered on d 78, there were no (P ≥ 0.10) sex × dietary DDGS interactions observed. Compared with barrows, gilts had greater (P < 0.05) C18:2n-6, PUFA, and PUFA:SFA ratio and lesser (P < 0.03) C14:0 concentrations in backfat and belly fat but not jowl fat. Gilts had greater (P = 0.03) belly fat IV than barrows, but there were no (P > 0.25) differences between gilts and barrows in backfat and jowl fat IV. In summary, feeding increasing amounts of DDGS linearly increased the IV of backfat, jowl fat, and belly fat in pigs. Although jowl fat was less responsive to increased DDGS than backfat and belly fat, pigs fed diets with 20% DDGS and 6% choice white grease exceeded the maximum jowl IV of 73 g/100 g set by some packing plants.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , Animal Feed , Body Composition , Diet/veterinary , Meat/standards , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Female , Male , Sex Characteristics , Swine
4.
J Anim Sci ; 86(7): 1579-87, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18344296

ABSTRACT

Three experiments were conducted to determine the optimal level of dried distiller grains with solubles (DDGS) from a common ethanol manufacturing facility and to determine the potential interactions between dietary DDGS and added fat on performance and carcass characteristics of growing and finishing pigs. All experiments were conducted at the same commercial facility and used DDGS from the same ethanol manufacturing facility. In Exp. 1, a total of 1,050 pigs (average initial BW 47.6 kg), with 24 to 26 pigs per pen and 7 pens per treatment, were fed diets containing 0 or 15% DDGS and 0, 3, or 6% added choice white grease in a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement in a 28-d growth study. Overall, there were no DDGS x added fat interactions (P >/= 0.14). There was an improvement (linear, P < 0.01) in ADG and G:F as the percentage of added fat increased. There was no difference (P = 0.74) in growth performance between pigs fed 0 or 15% DDGS. In Exp. 2, a total of 1,038 pigs (average initial BW 46.3 kg), with 24 to 26 pigs per pen and 10 pens per treatment, were fed diets containing 0, 10, 20, or 30% DDGS in a 56-d growth study. Pigs fed diets containing DDGS had a tendency for decreased ADG and ADFI (both linear, P = 0.09 and 0.05, respectively), but the greatest reduction seemed to occur between pigs fed 10 and 20% DDGS. In Exp. 3, a total of 1,112 pigs (average initial BW 49.7 kg), with 25 to 28 pigs per pen and 9 pens per treatment, were used in a 78-d growth study to evaluate the effects of increasing DDGS (0, 5, 10, 15, or 20%) in the diet on pig growth performance and carcass characteristics. From d 0 to 78, ADG and ADFI decreased linearly (P

Subject(s)
Dietary Carbohydrates/administration & dosage , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Edible Grain , Swine/growth & development , Adipose Tissue/physiology , Animal Feed , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Body Weight/physiology , Dietary Carbohydrates/metabolism , Dietary Fats/metabolism , Swine/metabolism
5.
J Anim Sci ; 86(7): 1556-61, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18344298

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of NutriDense low-phytate corn in conjunction with increasing added dietary fat on growing and finishing pig performance. Diets in both experiments were corn-soybean meal-based, with yellow dent or NutriDense low-phytate corn and 0, 3, or 6% added choice white grease arranged in a 2 x 3 factorial design. There were 25 to 28 pigs per pen and 7 pens (replications) per treatment in both experiments. In Exp. 1, a total of 1,162 gilts with an initial BW of 44.6 kg were used in a 28-d growth study. A constant true ileal digestible (TID) Lys:ME ratio of 2.80 g/Mcal and available P:ME ratio of 0.90 g/Mcal were maintained in all treatment diets. Overall (d 0 to 28), there were no corn source x added fat interactions (P >/= 0.79). Regardless of corn source, ADG and G:F increased (linear, P = 0.03) with increasing added fat. There were no differences (P >/= 0.34) in pig growth performance between those fed NutriDense low-phytate or yellow dent corn. In Exp. 2, a total of 1,128 gilts with an initial BW of 81.6 kg were used in a 28-d growth study. A constant TID Lys:ME ratio of 2.15 g/Mcal of ME and available P:ME ratio of 0.75 g/Mcal were maintained in all treatment diets. Overall (d 0 to 28), there was a tendency (P = 0.07) for a corn source x added fat interaction for G:F, which can be explained by the improved G:F in pigs fed yellow dent corn only when 6% fat was added to the diet, whereas G:F was improved at both 3 and 6% added fat in pigs fed NutriDense low-phytate corn. There were no differences (P >/= 0.18) in growth performance between pigs fed NutriDense low-phytate or yellow dent corn. These results indicate that increasing added fat improved growth performance regardless of the corn source. In addition, growth performance was similar for pigs fed NutriDense low-phytate or yellow dent corn.


Subject(s)
Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Phytic Acid/administration & dosage , Swine/growth & development , Zea mays/metabolism , Animal Feed , Animals , Body Weight/physiology , Dietary Fats/metabolism , Female , Phytic Acid/metabolism , Random Allocation , Swine/metabolism
6.
J Anim Sci ; 85(8): 2043-7, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17504958

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate effects of out-of-feed events on nursery and grow-finish pig performance. An out-of-feed event is a period of time that pigs do not have access to feed as a result of late feed delivery or bridging in bulk bins, feed lines, or feeders. In these studies, we created an out-of-feed event by removing the feeders from pens or preventing access to the feeder. In Exp. 1, 190 pigs (initially 6.4 +/- 1.6 kg and 21 +/- 3 d of age) were used in a 35-d growth study. Treatments involved a 20-h feed withdrawal for 1, 2, or 3 randomly selected times or a control treatment where feeders were never withdrawn. Feeders were withdrawn on d 11 for pigs with 1 out-of-feed event, d 8 and 23 for pigs with 2 out-of-feed events, and d 9, 14, and 20 for pigs with 3 out-of-feed events. There was a treatment (P < 0.06) effect only during weeks in which an out-of-feed event occurred. Growth rate was lower (P < 0.05) for pigs with 1 out-of-feed event (d 11) compared with control in the d 8 to 14 period. During the same period, those pigs with the first of 2 (d 8) or 3 (d 9) out-of-feed events had intermediate ADG. In the d 15 to 21 period, only pigs with the second and third of 3 out-of-feed events (d 15 and 20) had lower growth performance compared with control pigs, whereas growth performance was similar to the control for those with 1 or 2 out-of-feed events. Pigs with 3 out-of-feed events had greater ADG and G:F (P < 0.05) compared with the other 3 treatments for the d 22 to 28 period. For the overall study (d 0 to 35), there were no differences (P > 0.86) in growth performance among pigs with 0, 1, 2, or 3 out-of-feed events. In Exp. 2, 479 pigs (initially 41.6 +/- 4 kg) were used in an 85-d growth study. Treatments involved feed withdrawal (20 h) weekly for the duration of the study; feed withdrawn weekly from d 45 to 85; or a control treatment where pigs had access to feed for the duration of the experiment. Feed withdrawal occurred on a randomly selected day with the exception of Saturday, Sunday, or a day before a weigh day (usually a Thursday every other week). From d 0 to 45, 46 to 85, and the overall d 0 to 85 period, there were no differences (P > 0.12) in ADG, ADFI, G:F, or average final BW among treatments. Results suggest that out-of-feed events of 20 h or less have no long-term detrimental effects on growth performance in nursery or grow-finish pigs.


Subject(s)
Food Deprivation/physiology , Swine/growth & development , Weight Gain/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Female , Male , Random Allocation , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...